Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Eugene Arshinov
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:34:03 +0100
Thomas Martitz  wrote:

> Am 07.01.2012 17:34, schrieb Eugene Arshinov:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine)
> >
> 
> I suggest you to use git format-patch, as to preserve author and
> commit message information. Probably not a big deal for this one
> though.
> 
> Best regards.
> 

Thanks for the suggestion!  The updated patch is attached.

--
Best regards,
Eugene.

>From 7c54379db352340ff202930347d8aef2c62d510f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugene Arshinov 
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:50:54 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add XMLSnippets plugin maintainer info

---
 MAINTAINERS |8 
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f5f0d26..684dd74 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ W: http://plugins.geany.org/webhelper.html
 S: Supported
 
 xmlsnippets
-P:
-M:
-W:
-S:
+P: Eugene Arshinov 
+M: Eugene Arshinov 
+W: http://plugins.geany.org/xmlsnippets.html
+S: Maintained
-- 
1.7.8.1

___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Thomas Martitz

Am 07.01.2012 17:34, schrieb Eugene Arshinov:

Hi.

Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine)



I suggest you to use git format-patch, as to preserve author and commit 
message information. Probably not a big deal for this one though.


Best regards.

___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Eugene Arshinov
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:29:30 +0100
Frank Lanitz  wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to
> find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in
> patches or updating the file on your own for your plugins to show who
> is maintaining etc. File contains a little header with very brief
> instructions to do so.

Hi.

Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine)

--
Best regards,
Eugene.diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f5f0d26..684dd74 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ W: http://plugins.geany.org/webhelper.html
 S: Supported
 
 xmlsnippets
-P:
-M:
-W:
-S:
+P: Eugene Arshinov 
+M: Eugene Arshinov 
+W: http://plugins.geany.org/xmlsnippets.html
+S: Maintained
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Maintainerrequest: Geany-Mini-Script

2012-01-07 Thread Eugene Arshinov
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:03:30 +0400
Eugene Arshinov  wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:41:06 +0100
> Frank Lanitz  wrote:
> 
> > Am 08.10.2011 21:50, schrieb Eugene Arshinov:
> > >> > Unfortunately I didn't heard back of developer of
> > >> > geany-mini-script-plugin so today I like to ask you whether
> > >> > somebody likes to take over maintenance for geany-mini-script
> > >> > plugin inside geany-plugins-svn. It's untouched since maybe
> > >> > 2009 and to be honest I have no idea, what's the current
> > >> > status. Also I'm not 100% whether its still a useful plugin or
> > >> > maybe some other plugin is taking over the task in a better
> > >> > way. Personally I remember it as a possible useful plugin but
> > >> > don't have the resources to look after and used it >>1 year
> > >> > for the last time. If nobody is feeling responsible I suggest,
> > >> > similar to previous plugins, we remove it from official
> > >> > repository. 
> > >
> > > In case someone wants to try the plugin, here is a patch to make
> > > it compile.
> > 
> > Did anyone try it? Does anyone likes to take it over and maybe
> > integrate it into geany-plugins?
> > 
> 
> If no one wants, I could take a minimal care of this plugin.  Though,
> I can't promise I'll have time for it when it's needed.  I still have
> SM-branch related stuff which I can't do for weeks...
> 

Hi Frank.

I wonder what's the state of the geany-mini-scripts plugin now?  It
seems that only SVN's /geany-plugins/geany-plugins/ part was converted
to Git, and AFAIR geany-mini-script was living next to geany-plugins
(at /geany-plugins/geany-mini-script/) and wasn't converted.

I can use the copy from my local geany-plugins Git repository (bound to
the old SVN repository) and push it somewhere on Github.  Then perhaps
I can integrate the plugin into geany-plugins, push the result to a
fork of geany-plugins and send a pull request.  Is it the way to go?

--
Best regards,
Eugene.
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Colomban Wendling

Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit :

On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100
Frank Lanitz  wrote:


* What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained?  The
only difference I see is that "supported" has the word "paid" in the
description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in
particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the
support (hobby vs. job).


My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to
s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who
is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) )


I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of
supported to maintained.


I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, but 
otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me.


Cheers,
Colomban
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Frank Lanitz
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100
Frank Lanitz  wrote:

> > * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained?  The
> > only difference I see is that "supported" has the word "paid" in the
> > description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in
> > particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the
> > support (hobby vs. job).
> 
> My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to
> s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who
> is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) )

I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of
supported to maintained. 

Cheers, 
Frank 
-- 
http://frank.uvena.de/en/


pgpYT2is6fZNZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel