Re: gEDA-user: BC547 vs. 2N3904

2006-10-31 Thread Wojciech Kazubski
 Does driving the transistor into cutoff but not saturation also count
 as saturation switching?

 CL

No, saturation is when collector voltage drops below base level and the 
collector junction becomes forward biased. Charge stored in this junction is 
the cause of swithing delays. Swiching transistors have special doping that 
reduces carrier lifetime and speeds up the transistor.
Transistors can be operated into cutoff on high frequency, this happens for 
example in B or C class RF amplifiers. Their parameters (hfe, fT) degrade a 
bit when the transistor approaches cutoff, so C class amplifiers cannot be 
operated on the frequences as high as in linear mode (class A) with higher DC 
current.
But I think that this may be a problem above VHF band.

Wojciech Kazubski


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: pcb refdes name restrictions?

2006-10-31 Thread Peter Baxendale
Thanks for the comment on refdes values. I'll add a few things to next
year's notes for the students.

It had never occurred to me to use anything but an upper case alpha
character followed by a numeric value for a refdes, but students have a
habit of trying the unexpected. It threw me for quite a while trying to
understand what pcb was complaining about, since it referred to a CONN
part which wasn't in either the schematic or the pcb netlist or the pcb
file. Now I know about the lower case feature I'll know what to look for
next time.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but only lower case at the end of a refdes is
ignored by pcb (but not by gsch2pcb), so something like Rp4 is ok.



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Pointer to 3d CAD?

2006-10-31 Thread Karel Kulhavy
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:27:59AM -0800, Dave N6NZ wrote:
 Off topic I know, but I need a pointer.  Is there a decent FOSS 3D CAD 
 program that will create STL files for simple parts?

I don't know what a STL file is. FOSS 3D CAD is BRL-CAD which I use on
Ronja:
http://ronja.twibright.com/3d

CL


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: pcb refdes name restrictions?

2006-10-31 Thread Dan McMahill

Stuart Brorson wrote:


Note that you can't do this with things like CONNpower and
CONNsignal.  How do you renumber alpha refdeses?  Admittedly,
CONNpower and the like are easier to deal with than J1, J2, etc, but
if you've got a board with thousands of components on it, then you
can't give each a unique alpha refdes, and the above renumbering
scheme is extremely convenient.

Since we can't do backanno in gschem/PCB, this point is moot, however.


We're pretty close to being able to do that.  You can renumber 
automatically in PCB and it produces a file that with probably only a 
few minutes of perl hacking could be used to back annotate to gschem.


Actually, I'll see if I have any energy left after halloween activities 
tonight to code up something.  Since there is already a perl program for 
backannotating from pads all that has to change is the parser and that 
should be easy.


-Dan


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: pcb refdes name restrictions?

2006-10-31 Thread Peter Baxendale
 I am curious to know if your notes are available online, or are released
 under such a license that we can make them available to students here?
 

I've put them on my web page
( http://www.durham.ac.uk/peter.baxendale ). They are pdfs but I can
send you openoffice files if they are any use to you. They are just
brief notes to support a simple assignment (4x2 hour sessions) so you
may find them a bit basic. I'd be interested in hearing your own
experiences using geda with students.



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: pcb refdes name restrictions?

2006-10-31 Thread Peter Clifton
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:00 +, Peter Baxendale wrote:
  I am curious to know if your notes are available online, or are released
  under such a license that we can make them available to students here?
  
 
 I've put them on my web page
 ( http://www.durham.ac.uk/peter.baxendale ). They are pdfs but I can
 send you openoffice files if they are any use to you. They are just
 brief notes to support a simple assignment (4x2 hour sessions) so you
 may find them a bit basic. I'd be interested in hearing your own
 experiences using geda with students.

Aha... I am a student myself actually (just starting a PhD), so have no
direct experience with teaching gEDA. My own experience was that the
learning curve is initially steep, but having got to grips with it, I
find it far nicer than other EDA packages I've used. To keep things
simpler, we try and provide symbols and footprints for all parts which
students might be expected to use.

We run a robot design project, subdivided into mechanical, electrical
and software components. The electronics is done basically on strip
board, but that is a sub-section on our PCB(s) with micro-controller
interfaces ready to populate.

I am one of the demonstrators for the electronics part of the lab, and
the desire is (from the project's leader) that the students use gschem
or similar to draw their schematics. We aren't yet at the stage where
these students build custom PCBs, however various ideas for rapid
prototyping (miniature milling setups) have been discussed as a future
possibility.

I'll show the notes to Dr. Long, who is in charge of the robot design
project. The draw, simulate, layout exercise looks a lot like the sort
of thing he was suggesting for more general ECAD teaching.

Regards

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: Forwarding some gEDA teaching materials I've discovered:

2006-10-31 Thread Peter Clifton
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:00 +, Peter Baxendale wrote:
  I am curious to know if your notes are available online, or are released
  under such a license that we can make them available to students here?
  
 
 I've put them on my web page
 ( http://www.durham.ac.uk/peter.baxendale ). They are pdfs but I can
 send you openoffice files if they are any use to you. They are just
 brief notes to support a simple assignment (4x2 hour sessions) so you
 may find them a bit basic. I'd be interested in hearing your own
 experiences using geda with students.

Look under: http://www.dur.ac.uk/peter.baxendale/stuff/gEDA/

There is quite a nice simple little exercise there.

Regards,


-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: pcb refdes name restrictions?

2006-10-31 Thread John Luciani

On 10/31/06, Peter Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


We run a robot design project, subdivided into mechanical, electrical
and software components. The electronics is done basically on strip
board, but that is a sub-section on our PCB(s) with micro-controller
interfaces ready to populate.

I am one of the demonstrators for the electronics part of the lab, and
the desire is (from the project's leader) that the students use gschem
or similar to draw their schematics. We aren't yet at the stage where
these students build custom PCBs, however various ideas for rapid
prototyping (miniature milling setups) have been discussed as a future
possibility.


Peter,

 When Dr. Long was at the Freedog meeting in August he gave out copies
of an MDP DVD (Version 0.5.8 Beta). Is that DVD (or a more recent version)
available for download?

(* jcl *)



--
http://www.luciani.org


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Forwarding some gEDA teaching materials I've discovered:

2006-10-31 Thread Peter Clifton
[whoops... managed to send to the list by accident!]

 Look under: http://www.dur.ac.uk/peter.baxendale/stuff/gEDA/
 
 There is quite a nice simple little exercise there.
 
 Regards,




___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: pcb refdes name restrictions?

2006-10-31 Thread Dan McMahill

Dan McMahill wrote:

Stuart Brorson wrote:


Note that you can't do this with things like CONNpower and
CONNsignal.  How do you renumber alpha refdeses?  Admittedly,
CONNpower and the like are easier to deal with than J1, J2, etc, but
if you've got a board with thousands of components on it, then you
can't give each a unique alpha refdes, and the above renumbering
scheme is extremely convenient.

Since we can't do backanno in gschem/PCB, this point is moot, however.



We're pretty close to being able to do that.  You can renumber 
automatically in PCB and it produces a file that with probably only a 
few minutes of perl hacking could be used to back annotate to gschem.


Actually, I'll see if I have any energy left after halloween activities 
tonight to code up something.  Since there is already a perl program for 
backannotating from pads all that has to change is the parser and that 
should be easy.


ok, actually spent 10 minutes and cranked it out.

gaf/utils/scripts/pcb_backannotate is in CVS.  Any feedback would be 
appreciated.


To use, *make a scratch copy of your design first*.  Please don't mess 
up your active copy and blame me!  If you use cvs or subversion or 
whatever, its a good time to check in your work first so you can undo 
all of these changes globally.


open up your layout, run the pcb action

  :Renumber()

and give a log file name.  PCB will renumber your footprints and record 
its actions in the log file.


Now run

  pcb_backannotate [--verbose] renumber_log_file pg1.sch [pg2.sch ...]

and hopefully all of your changes will be back annotated.

-Dan


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: experiences using geda with students

2006-10-31 Thread John Griessen



Peter Clifton wrote:

We run a robot design project, 

.
.
.
the desire is (from the project's leader) that the students use gschem

or similar to draw their schematics. We aren't yet at the stage where
these students build custom PCBs, however various ideas for rapid
prototyping (miniature milling setups) have been discussed as a future
possibility.



I saw at one Univ. site, (maybe MIT) a lab procedure about using their owned 
spray etching station.  I have tested a very environmentally friendly etchant 
using HCl and H2O2 and pure copper metal to start off a solution and it works 
well enough without spray, and precipitates copper hydroxide when pH neutralized 
leaving slightly salty water that can go down the drain.   The copper hydroxide 
can be sent to the landfill or sold scrap even.  This etchant recipe, originally 
published by Leo Van Loon, is easy to see through, easy to replenish by color 
change, and low risk of eating holes in clothes, and makes no stains on hands or 
clothes.  Baking soda in water is all you need to neutralize/rinse just etched 
boards, and lye, (NaOH), and pH paper or meter is all you need to neutralize 
excess etchant.  Replenishing is by adding HCl 35% and H202 35% -- it increases 
the volume of etchant, so you drain out some before replenishing the etchant. 
The chemicals are available and cheap -- $6/gal for acid, $13/liter for H2O2 
35%, and those sizes are the right proportions to buy in to make the recipe.


Here's a board etched with it:
http://shop.cottagematic.com/elab/etched-board-epson-photo-paper.jpg
This photo was out of focus, but it's easy to see in a bubble tank when laminate 
substrate is showing   --  copper can still be seen on the bottom edge. 
http://shop.cottagematic.com/elab/etch-done.jpg


With spray, it would be a more even etch over panels of boards, and easier to 
see the progress of the etch for first time success.  When you make some 
standardizing assumptions like your board sizes are 90% 2x4 cm, 5% 3x6 cm, and 
none are longer than 6 inches; 95% of boards are single sided copper plus wire 
jumpers, surface mount only;  the etch station is small and easy.


The main thing to buy is an acid proof pump for the etch spray.  If you have a 
fume hood to put it in, any old clear plastic or glass can be used for the low 
requirements of the tank size and strength, and assembled with silicone RTV like 
a fish tank. If you didn't have a fume hood, some kind of box with a slight 
vacuum fan to pull air through some baking soda would neutralize any HCl mist or 
vapor as it is done and purify the air inside the etch tank after the spray pump 
stops.  the final thing required is a fish tank heater.  That attaches to the 
lid so you can make a glass tube to lid wall seal with silicone RTV (again).


I have all the parts and will be trying it out soon and report more on this list 
about it, and would negotiate to make you a system if there is no one who can 
budget time on it at your place -- It would be about $400 for a new pump, $100 
for a used one and about 6 hours or less work to hire to get one assembled.


John Griessen


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

2006-10-31 Thread Mark Rages

I sent out a big bunch yesterday; people in the northeast US may get
them tomorrow, else you'll start getting them next week.

And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
success stories :-)


Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope?  It just sits on my
workbench, mocking me.

I'm waiting for a day when I'm less caffeinated.

Regards,
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one.
 - fortune cookie


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Pointer to 3d CAD?

2006-10-31 Thread evan foss

I have not tried it but if you look at
http://ftp.brlcad.org/VolumeIV-Converting_Geometry.pdf
it talks about STL file. STL Import and Export according to page 18.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: gwave installation failure on OpenBSD

2006-10-31 Thread Karel Kulhavy
guile-gtk-2.1-0.31 from http://geda.seul.org/sources.html fails on
OpenBSD 3.9 with

rm -f /usr/local/bin/build-guile-gtk
rm -f /usr/local/bin/guile-gtk
ln /usr/local/bin/build-guile-gtk-1.2 /usr/local/bin/build-guile-gtk
/bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /usr/local/lib
 /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c  libguilegtk-1.2.la 
/usr/local/lib/libguilegtk-1.2.la
 /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libguilegtk-1.2.so.0.0 
/usr/local/lib/libguilegtk-1.2.so.0.0
 install: .libs/libguilegtk-1.2.so.0.0: No such file or directory
 *** Error code 71

 Stop in /home/clock/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31 (line 243 of Makefile).
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /home/clock/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31 (line 596 of Makefile).
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /home/clock/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31 (line 408 of Makefile).

Does the gwave has to be based on something that is so nonportable that on
OpenBSD 3.9 it cannot figure out path to it's own compilation result?

CL


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Meier
Be very very afriad of those 01005 capacitors... They seem to be virtual
quantum devices... either you know where they are or you don't. Seeing
as they have very small mass the heisenberg uncertainty principle is
working against you in that they are likely to soon be some where else.

Steve M.

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:25 -0600, Mark Rages wrote:
  I sent out a big bunch yesterday; people in the northeast US may get
  them tomorrow, else you'll start getting them next week.
 
  And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
  success stories :-)
 
 Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope?  It just sits on my
 workbench, mocking me.
 
 I'm waiting for a day when I'm less caffeinated.
 
 Regards,
 Mark
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

2006-10-31 Thread Bob Paddock
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 13:25, Mark Rages wrote:
  And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
  success stories :-)
 
 Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope?  It just sits on my
 workbench, mocking me.

I just opened my ten pack.  Ten individual kits of parts
and board, with ten instruction sheets,
very nicely done.  Perfect to inflict on several people at work.
 
 I'm waiting for a day when I'm less caffeinated.

I'm going to give the first one to my Tech.  He could do Brain Surgery
if he wanted to do it.  I'm going to get out my Stopwatch and see
how fast he gets it done. :-)


-- 
 http://www.softwaresafety.net/ http://www.designer-iii.com/
 http://www.unusualresearch.com/


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Time or order your SMD Challenge Board!

2006-10-31 Thread Samuel A. Falvo II

On 10/22/06, DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

http://www.delorie.com/pcb/smd-challenge/


I just ordered 2.

--
Samuel A. Falvo II


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

2006-10-31 Thread John Griessen

I suppose so...  I ripped mine right open.

The lands for the 01 05 's are verry teeny
I'll maybe sharpen my soldering iron
I need some fine solder wick.
Shopping to do...

John G

Mark Rages wrote:

And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
success stories :-)


Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope?  It just sits on my
workbench, mocking me.



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Meier
My tech got his together other then those 01005's which were apperently
used to fill a couple of pico black holes.

Steve M.

Bob Paddock wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 13:25, Mark Rages wrote:
  
And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
success stories :-)
  
Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope?  It just sits on my
workbench, mocking me.


I just opened my ten pack.  Ten individual kits of parts
and board, with ten instruction sheets,
very nicely done.  Perfect to inflict on several people at work.
 
  
I'm waiting for a day when I'm less caffeinated.


I'm going to give the first one to my Tech.  He could do Brain Surgery
if he wanted to do it.  I'm going to get out my Stopwatch and see
how fast he gets it done. :-)


  



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Meier
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
Quantum Theory translated into English in 1930.

Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron and is
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It fulfills all
requirements of the quantum theory, and is able to give a good account
of the phenomena of the spinning electron, which could previously only
be treated by, ad hoc assumptions. The essential difficulty which arises
with all relativistic quantum theories is not eliminated however. This
arises from the relation

1/c^2 = u^2C^2  + p^2 in x + p^2 in y + p^2 in z

between the energy and the momentum of a free electron. According to
this equation there are two values of E which differ in sign associated
with each set of P in z, P in  y and P in Z. The classical theory could
eliminate this by arbitrarily excluding the one sign, but this is not
possible according to the  principles og quantum theory. Here
spontaneuos transitions may occure to the states of negative energy; as
these have never been observed, the theory is certainly wrong. Under
these conditions it is very remarkable that the positive energy-levels
(at least in the case of one electron) coincide with those actually
observed.

So what was wrong? What occured that proved both theories were correct?

Steve M.



Steve Meier wrote:
Be very very afriad of those 01005 capacitors... They seem to be virtual
quantum devices... either you know where they are or you don't. Seeing
as they have very small mass the heisenberg uncertainty principle is
working against you in that they are likely to soon be some where else.

Steve M.

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:25 -0600, Mark Rages wrote:
  
I sent out a big bunch yesterday; people in the northeast US may get
them tomorrow, else you'll start getting them next week.

And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
success stories :-)
  
Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope?  It just sits on my
workbench, mocking me.

I'm waiting for a day when I'm less caffeinated.

Regards,
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

  



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: smd challenge board status

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Meier
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's Quantum 
Theory translated into English in 1930.

Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron and is 
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It fulfills all
requirements of the quantum theory, and is able to give a good account of the 
phenomena of the spinning electron, which could previously only
be treated by, ad hoc assumptions. The essential difficulty which arises with 
all relativistic quantum theories is not eliminated however. This
arises from the relation

E^2/c2 = u^2*C2  + p2 in x + p2 in y + p2 in z

between the energy and the momentum of a free electron. According to this 
equation there are two values of E which differ in sign associated
with each set of P in z, P in  y and P in Z. The classical theory could 
eliminate this by arbitrarily excluding the one sign, but this is not
possible according to the  principles og quantum theory. Here spontaneuos 
transitions may occure to the states of negative energy; as
these have never been observed, the theory is certainly wrong. Under these 
conditions it is very remarkable that the positive energy-levels
(at least in the case of one electron) coincide with those actually observed.

So what was wrong? What occured that proved both theories were correct?

Steve M.



Steve Meier wrote:
Be very very afriad of those 01005 capacitors... They seem to be virtual
quantum devices... either you know where they are or you don't. Seeing
as they have very small mass the heisenberg uncertainty principle is
working against you in that they are likely to soon be some where else.

Steve M.

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:25 -0600, Mark Rages wrote:
  
I sent out a big bunch yesterday; people in the northeast US may get
them tomorrow, else you'll start getting them next week.

And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
success stories :-)
  
Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope?  It just sits on my
workbench, mocking me.

I'm waiting for a day when I'm less caffeinated.

Regards,
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

  



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user