gEDA-user: GL branch of pcb

2010-08-02 Thread andrew whyte
Does anyone know where the amazing 3D branch of pcb went?  I installed
it a while back from repo.or.cz, but it doesn't seem to be there any
more and I can't find it simply by googling around.

Sorry for the question,  at least this thread should be resolved quickly.

Are people working with this version in general?  For more than 2
layres, I find that the translucency is *really* is helpful, so it
would be a shame not to migrate across to this.

-- 
╒═╕
     Andrew Whyte MEng CEng
╘═╛


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: GL branch of pcb

2010-08-02 Thread andrew whyte
  Apologies to all.  I have found it here:

http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb.git

  I think that repo.or.cz have changed thier URI.





On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:35 AM, andrew whyte ajwh...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does anyone know where the amazing 3D branch of pcb went?  I installed
 it a while back from repo.or.cz, but it doesn't seem to be there any
 more and I can't find it simply by googling around.

 Sorry for the question,  at least this thread should be resolved quickly.

 Are people working with this version in general?  For more than 2
 layres, I find that the translucency is *really* is helpful, so it
 would be a shame not to migrate across to this.

 --
 ╒═╕
      Andrew Whyte MEng CEng
 ╘═╛


 ___
 geda-user mailing list
 geda-user@moria.seul.org
 http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user




-- 
╒═╕
     Andrew Whyte MEng CEng
╞═╡
     @ - a...@paramita-electronics.com
     ⌨ - www.paramita-electronics.com
     ☎ - +44 (0) 79 81 01 61 85
╘═╛


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: gcshem to magic

2010-08-02 Thread Oliver King-Smith
   OK
   So I am trying to generate a netlist for magic (I know this is not
   quite gEDA), but I can't find any documentation on magic's netlist
   format.  Does anyone know what the format is.
   It looks like it a net follows this format
   [instance]/[port]
   [instance]/[port]
   [instance]/[port]
   But how do I create a new net.  Initially I thought it was a blank
   line, but the router appears to think these are all the same net.
   Oliver
 __

   From: John Doty j...@noqsi.com
   To: gEDA user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org
   Sent: Sun, August 1, 2010 7:20:28 PM
   Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gcshem to magic
   On Aug 1, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Oliver King-Smith wrote:
 I have some analog circuits in gschem that I want to layout in the
 magic vlsi tool.  Is there a good way to go from gschem to magic?
 For example it would be nice to generate transistors automatically
 (give w, l, and m) and then add port names for S,D,G,B.  Likewise it
 would be nice to produce a magic compatible netlist, so the
   interactive
 router can then be used once the cells are placed.
 Please let me know if there is a recommended way of doing this?
 If you think there is a better way to tackle this problem please let
   me
 know.
   gnetlist is the tool for exporting netlists to other tools, using
   back ends for the specific export problem. It appears nobody has
   written a back end for magic. Back ends are not terribly difficult to
   write.
   John Doty  Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
   [1]http://www.noqsi.com/
   [2]...@noqsi.com
   ___
   geda-user mailing list
   [3]geda-u...@moria.seul.org
   [4]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References

   1. http://www.noqsi.com/
   2. mailto:j...@noqsi.com
   3. mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org
   4. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: New icon set and UI changes

2010-08-02 Thread Andrew Poelstra

Hey all,

I have drawn a new icon set for PCB. Screenshot here:
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9031/pcbicons.png

I am happy to provide a patch to use these icons by default - however, I have a 
few concerns:
  1. They will likely take up too much space on low resolutions. Does anyone do 
CAD on low-res monitors?
  2. Even with decent resolution, they take up a lot of horizontal space with 
the default view.

Thoughts? Comments?


A couple other ideas I have:
  * replacing the layer switcher with one similar to GIMP's (select box with 
icons for visibility/locked)
  * doing something similar with the route-style switcher, showing the line and 
via sizes in the select list

I'm happy to do the work for these changes, but would there be popular support 
for such intrusive UI changes?


Just throwing this out there.
Andrew



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: New icon set and UI changes

2010-08-02 Thread Andrew Poelstra
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 I have drawn a new icon set for PCB. Screenshot here:
 http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9031/pcbicons.png
 
 ...

One more thing - I spent more time on the Lock icon than all the
others combined, and it still looks awful. If anyone wants to take
a crack at it, please do.

Andrew



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: New icon set and UI changes

2010-08-02 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 12:39 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 I have drawn a new icon set for PCB. Screenshot here:
 http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9031/pcbicons.png
 
 I am happy to provide a patch to use these icons by default - however,
 I have a few concerns:
   1. They will likely take up too much space on low resolutions. Does
 anyone do CAD on low-res monitors?
   2. Even with decent resolution, they take up a lot of horizontal
 space with the default view.
 
 Thoughts? Comments?

For large boards (http://www.ssalewski.de/b1.png) I like to have much
room for the PCB available -- so your icons may indeed  consume too much
space. Is there an option to turn of text? For pcb 2009 snapshot icons
are at the left side, I think this may be better, because many monitors
now are 16/9 form factor, width screen. It would be fine to leave no
room unoccupied, i.e below layers icons, maybe you should try to propose
a complete now screen layout?

 
 A couple other ideas I have:
   * replacing the layer switcher with one similar to GIMP's (select
 box with icons for visibility/locked)

Again, we should not waste space. The current layout may not look
great but it is compact, we have color indicator, text and toggle
button on the same area. I know layouts which waste much room.

   * doing something similar with the route-style switcher, showing the
 line and via sizes in the select list
 

Please note, our long term goal is to have not 4 route styles, but
styles associated with layers, so we select layer17 and have 4 mil
traces, with 6 mil clearance, and 75 Ohm impedance for layer2... 

 I'm happy to do the work for these changes, but would there be popular
 support for such intrusive UI changes?
 
 

Please note that we have GTK and Lesstif/Motif GUI for PCB program.

And: If we consider changes, we may consider giving PCB, gschem and
related tools a more uniform look and feel.

Best regards

Stefan Salewski




___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: New icon set and UI changes

2010-08-02 Thread Andrew Poelstra
Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
 On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 12:39 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
  Hey all,
  
  I have drawn a new icon set for PCB. Screenshot here:
  http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9031/pcbicons.png
  
  I am happy to provide a patch to use these icons by default -
 however,
  I have a few concerns:
1. They will likely take up too much space on low resolutions.
 Does
  anyone do CAD on low-res monitors?
2. Even with decent resolution, they take up a lot of horizontal
  space with the default view.
  
  Thoughts? Comments?
 
 For large boards (http://www.ssalewski.de/b1.png) I like to have much
 room for the PCB available -- so your icons may indeed  consume too
 much space. Is there an option to turn of text? For pcb 2009 snapshot
 icons are at the left side, I think this may be better, because many
 monitors now are 16/9 form factor, width screen. It would be fine to
 leave no room unoccupied, i.e below layers icons, maybe you should try
 to propose a complete now screen layout?
 

No, the text is part of the images, like the current icons. What I will
probably do is remove the text entirely, shrink the icons to 32x32 (since
with the text, they are mostly blank space anyway), and rely on tooltips
to display what each tool is.

Like so:
http://img199.imageshack.us/f/pcbicons1.png/

If we had those icons up top, and a combination layer/route style switcher
below, we could improve the look of the sidebar without taking up any more
space than we do now.

  
  A couple other ideas I have:
* replacing the layer switcher with one similar to GIMP's (select
  box with icons for visibility/locked)
 
 Again, we should not waste space. The current layout may not look
 great but it is compact, we have color indicator, text and toggle
 button on the same area. I know layouts which waste much room.
 

I think we can fit a GIMP-style switcher into the same amount of space
as the current switcher. I'll play around and see what I can get. I
agree that space should be the primary concern when doing any UI
changes.

* doing something similar with the route-style switcher, showing
  the line and via sizes in the select list
  
 
 Please note, our long term goal is to have not 4 route styles, but
 styles associated with layers, so we select layer17 and have 4 mil
 traces, with 6 mil clearance, and 75 Ohm impedance for layer2... 
 

I haven't heard this before. How would it work when exporting layers
as Gerber files?


Andrew


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: New icon set and UI changes

2010-08-02 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 14:58 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:

   
  
  Please note, our long term goal is to have not 4 route styles, but
  styles associated with layers, so we select layer17 and have 4 mil
  traces, with 6 mil clearance, and 75 Ohm impedance for layer2... 
  
 
 I haven't heard this before. How would it work when exporting layers
 as Gerber files?
 
 

Sorry, my explanation may be not clear.
Not related to gerber export. Currently, we may change the layer, and
have to change route style at the same time, i.e. signal layer at layer
1, power supply with width traces at layer 2. If route style is bound to
layers, we only select other layer, and route styles change at the same
time. This was discussed on this list, but of course there is some
coding effort needed to change all this...

Best regards

Stefan Salewski




___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: New icon set and UI changes

2010-08-02 Thread Ali Moreno
Hi, them look good!

2010/8/3 Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca:

 Hey all,

 I have drawn a new icon set for PCB. Screenshot here:
 http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9031/pcbicons.png

 I am happy to provide a patch to use these icons by default - however, I have 
 a few concerns:

Where is the patch? it come with instructions how to use it?

  1. They will likely take up too much space on low resolutions. Does anyone 
 do CAD on low-res monitors?
  2. Even with decent resolution, they take up a lot of horizontal space with 
 the default view.

 Thoughts? Comments?


 A couple other ideas I have:
  * replacing the layer switcher with one similar to GIMP's (select box with 
 icons for visibility/locked)

It is a great idea

  * doing something similar with the route-style switcher, showing the line 
 and via sizes in the select list

 I'm happy to do the work for these changes, but would there be popular 
 support for such intrusive UI changes?


 Just throwing this out there.
 Andrew



 ___
 geda-user mailing list
 geda-user@moria.seul.org
 http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: gcshem to magic

2010-08-02 Thread David W. Schultz

On 08/02/2010 11:47 AM, Oliver King-Smith wrote:

OK
So I am trying to generate a netlist for magic (I know this is not
quite gEDA), but I can't find any documentation on magic's netlist
format.  Does anyone know what the format is.
It looks like it a net follows this format
[instance]/[port]
[instance]/[port]
[instance]/[port]
But how do I create a new net.  Initially I thought it was a blank
line, but the router appears to think these are all the same net.
Oliver


It has been a long time since I used Magic but I dug up my hardcopy of 
the 1990 documentation. For details on the netlist format it refers to 
the manual page for net(5). (aka man 5 net)



Which says that blank lines separate nets.


--
David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz
Life without stock is barely worth living... Anthony Bourdain


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: gcshem to magic

2010-08-02 Thread Oliver King-Smith
   Thanks David,
   I have come to the conclusion that was how it worked.  The netlist tool
   shows the correct netlist when I set up the file this way, but the
   router is merging some nets together for some reason.  I sent an
   example to Tim so may be he can give me some guidance.
   Is there a tool that is preferred with gEDA?
   Oliver
 __

   From: David W. Schultz david.schu...@earthlink.net
   To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
   Sent: Mon, August 2, 2010 4:13:58 PM
   Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gcshem to magic
   On 08/02/2010 11:47 AM, Oliver King-Smith wrote:
   OK
   So I am trying to generate a netlist for magic (I know this is not
   quite gEDA), but I can't find any documentation on magic's netlist
   format.  Does anyone know what the format is.
   It looks like it a net follows this format
   [instance]/[port]
   [instance]/[port]
   [instance]/[port]
   But how do I create a new net.  Initially I thought it was a blank
   line, but the router appears to think these are all the same net.
   Oliver
   It has been a long time since I used Magic but I dug up my hardcopy of
   the 1990 documentation. For details on the netlist format it refers to
   the manual page for net(5). (aka man 5 net)
   Which says that blank lines separate nets.
   -- David W. Schultz
   [1]http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz
   Life without stock is barely worth living... Anthony Bourdain
   ___
   geda-user mailing list
   [2]geda-u...@moria.seul.org
   [3]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References

   1. http://home.earthlink.net/%7Edavid.schultz
   2. mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org
   3. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user