gEDA-user: How to submit symbols to be included in the official distribution of gEDA Suite?

2011-07-11 Thread Ananda Murthy R S
   Hello,
   I have noticed that XSPICE code models do not have corresponding
   symbols. I have prepared symbols for these code models. How to submit
   them to be included in the official distribution of gEDA Suite?
   Anand
   --
   Close Windows ! Open source !!
   Free software from proprietary mafia !!!


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: question about how to get pads on my circuit board for power and gnd...

2011-07-11 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 05:19:01 -0600
Ed Hartnett edwardjameshartn...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:46 AM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
 
 
   I am trying to make my first PCB and I have selected a
   super-simple
  circuit
   to start with, a 555 astable circuit. It's a single-sided board,
   and I'm going to etch it myself - something I've always wanted to
   try.
  
   But what footprints do I use for the GND and VCC connections? I
   guess I would just like these to be two pads on the PCB. Is there
   a way to tell gschem this? Or do I just manually make that change
   in the pcb program?
 
  Usually, you would add one two-pin connector, or two one-pin
  connectors, for the power connection.  There are a range of
  footprints available for this - if you just want to solder wires to
  it, HEADER2_1 is sufficient - it's just two pins on 0.1 centers.
 
 
 Would this be done in gschem? Or in pcb?
 
 In gschem I have a symbol for gnd, and there is no footprint
 associated with it. There is another symbol for +5 V. Do I add a
 connector on gschem and use it instead of then GND/5V symbols? Or do
 I associate a footprint of HEADER2_1 with each of them? Or with one
 of them?

I think Kai-Martin probably answered this pretty thoroughly, but I'll
comment that, like you, I once wanted to add two plain old surface mount
pads to which I could solder my power/ground supply wires.

You correctly noted that GND/+5V symbols don't have a footprint
associated.  These “power rail” symbols, like the input/output pin
symbols (input-2.sym, etc.), are schematic conveniences only.  You
could remove them and instead connect all nodes with actual net lines
instead, but that is often very messy.  The power rail and I/O pin
make schematics cleaner.

What you want is to use is either

(1) use connector2-1.sym, and then assign it a 2-pin footprint like
“JUMPER2” (2-pin SIP, 100 mil pitch through-hole header).  Then connect
pin 1 of the connector to your ground net and pin 2 to your power net
(or vice-versa).  If you want surface-mount pads, you can assign the
connector component a 2-pin SMD footprint like “RESC4532M”.

or if you want to be able to separately place the power and ground
connections on the PCB layout:

(2) insert two one-pin symbols (e.g., terminal-1.sym connector1-2.sym,
but note that these are “heavy” symbols and you need to change the
footprint unless you want the default though-hole pin footprint).
Connect one symbol to your ground net and one to your power rail net.
Assign the appropriate footprint--for a through-hole footprint, use
“JUMPER1”, “CONNECTOR 1 1”, or “SIP1N”; for a surface-mount footprint,
use a test-pad symbol or other single-pad SMD footprint (look on
gedasymbols.org; AFAIK the default pcb footprint library doesn't have
any single-pad SMD footprints).

Tip: If you use a 2-pin through-hole JUMPER2 footprint, you can solder
a 2-pin header from a ubiquitous single-row breakaway header (100 mil)
and then have a detachable power supply connection.  I have found the
low-cost Molex KK-100 series kit (see [1] below) invaluable for all
sorts of connections like this.  With a bit of practice, you will be
able to quickly made a wide variety of cables from 1 to 10+ pins.  I
use bits of ribbon cable to make most signal connectors because it's
very convenient and looks tidy when you're done.

Regards,
Colin

References

[1] Molex KK-100 Connector Kit

With premium crimp tool (I highly recommend this option):
Molex Part #: 76650-0009
Mouser link: 
http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Molex/76650-0009/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMtsLRyDR9nM1%2ffCLkgKsWdRr36mItq8jVo%3d

With basic crimp tool:
Molex Part #: 76650-0007
Mouser link: 
http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Molex/76650-0007/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMtsLRyDR9nM1%2ffCLkgKsWdRSyrCqTUdKBE%3d


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: Gtk grid changes on mm/mil toggle

2011-07-11 Thread Andrew Poelstra

Hey all,


Right now in the Gtk HID when you change grid units between
mm/mil, it will try to translate your grid setting into the
new units by finding something sufficiently close in the
menu.

For example, select 5mil and toggle the mm/mil button. You
will see the grid toggle between 5mil and 0.1mm.


What is the opinion on this feature? To me it seems to violate
the principle of least surprise, especially since it only
works for certain grid sizes.

It also forces gtk to make some dangerous assumptions about
what grid sizes are in the menu. If the user changes the menu
with gpcb-menu.res, the gtk HID will still assume the old
values, and do its closest-match based on that.

To the user, this would appear to be a randomly-selected,
unannounced, unintended, subtle setting change.


Can I remove this behavior?


-- 
Andrew Poelstra
Email: asp11 at sfu.ca OR apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web:   http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew/



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user