Re: gEDA-user: OT - non-contact digital current loop sniffer

2011-07-14 Thread Andy Fierman
As long as you have access to a single wire and not the return path!

:)

         Andy.

signality.co.uk




On 13 July 2011 22:48, Stephen Ecob silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM, David C. Kerber
 dker...@warrenrogersassociates.com wrote:
 Hi, electronics gurus -

 We have an application where we need to passively monitor a digital current 
 loop (no data sending by us), with a data rate of 9600 baud.  We already 
 have solutions for tapping into the circuit, but in some of our customers' 
 cases the circuits don't have enough drive capability to add another load to 
 it.  So we're looking for a non-loading, and preferably non-contact 
 solution, such as a inductive pickup or hall-effect pickup, that hopefully 
 wouldn't require us to break into the circuit.

 Does anybody know of such an animal?  If not, it's also possible that we 
 might contract to have one designed, but that's not decided for sure yet.  
 It's a fairly electrically noise environment, but not extreme, and the 
 sensor itself would likely be installed inside an already-existing box on 
 the wall.  The circuit runs at 45mA for the high signal, and the low is 2mA.

 Is the current flowing through a length of accessible wire at some
 point, or is it only accessible in a PCB trace ?
 If it flows through a length of wire then running it through a current
 transformer could work well.


 ___
 geda-user mailing list
 geda-user@moria.seul.org
 http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: OT - non-contact digital current loop sniffer

2011-07-14 Thread David C. Kerber
Yes, we have access to a single wire carrying the signal current (I remember 
enough of my 27-year old EE degree to catch that).  

But I had my doubts about a current transformer, because of the chance of 
having several bits at the same level, either high or low current, not giving 
any signal; ie a dc current for a short period, causing the signal from the CT 
to go to 0.  ISTM that this case would require some rather extensive signal 
processing, but I could easily be wrong about that; that's why I was thinking 
of a hall-effect transducer, which would detect dc signals.

Am I worrying about non-issues here?

Dave



 -Original Message-
 From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org 
 [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Andy Fierman
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:49 AM
 To: gEDA user mailing list
 Subject: Re: gEDA-user: OT - non-contact digital current loop sniffer
 
 As long as you have access to a single wire and not the return path!
 
 :)
 
          Andy.
 
 signality.co.uk
 
 
 
 
 On 13 July 2011 22:48, Stephen Ecob 
 silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM, David C. Kerber 
  dker...@warrenrogersassociates.com wrote:
  Hi, electronics gurus -
 
  We have an application where we need to passively monitor 
 a digital current loop (no data sending by us), with a data 
 rate of 9600 baud.  We already have solutions for tapping 
 into the circuit, but in some of our customers' cases the 
 circuits don't have enough drive capability to add another 
 load to it.  So we're looking for a non-loading, and 
 preferably non-contact solution, such as a inductive pickup 
 or hall-effect pickup, that hopefully wouldn't require us to 
 break into the circuit.
 
  Does anybody know of such an animal?  If not, it's also 
 possible that we might contract to have one designed, but 
 that's not decided for sure yet.  It's a fairly electrically 
 noise environment, but not extreme, and the sensor itself 
 would likely be installed inside an already-existing box on 
 the wall.  The circuit runs at 45mA for the high signal, and 
 the low is 2mA.
 
  Is the current flowing through a length of accessible wire at some 
  point, or is it only accessible in a PCB trace ?
  If it flows through a length of wire then running it 
 through a current 
  transformer could work well.
 
 
  ___
  geda-user mailing list
  geda-user@moria.seul.org
  http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
 
 
 
 ___
 geda-user mailing list
 geda-user@moria.seul.org
 http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
 


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: OT - non-contact digital current loop sniffer

2011-07-13 Thread Stephen Ecob
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM, David C. Kerber
dker...@warrenrogersassociates.com wrote:
 Hi, electronics gurus -

 We have an application where we need to passively monitor a digital current 
 loop (no data sending by us), with a data rate of 9600 baud.  We already have 
 solutions for tapping into the circuit, but in some of our customers' cases 
 the circuits don't have enough drive capability to add another load to it.  
 So we're looking for a non-loading, and preferably non-contact solution, such 
 as a inductive pickup or hall-effect pickup, that hopefully wouldn't require 
 us to break into the circuit.

 Does anybody know of such an animal?  If not, it's also possible that we 
 might contract to have one designed, but that's not decided for sure yet.  
 It's a fairly electrically noise environment, but not extreme, and the sensor 
 itself would likely be installed inside an already-existing box on the wall.  
 The circuit runs at 45mA for the high signal, and the low is 2mA.

Is the current flowing through a length of accessible wire at some
point, or is it only accessible in a PCB trace ?
If it flows through a length of wire then running it through a current
transformer could work well.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user