Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-11 Thread Bert Timmerman
Hi all, 

 -Original Message-
 From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org 
 [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Steven 
 Michalske
 Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:56 AM
 To: gEDA user mailing list
 Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage
 
 
  Maybe we are targetting the wrong OS ;-(
 
 
 Nope, I like my mac os install,  and engineering colleges are 
 seeing a large uptick in mac usage in colleges.
 It is a perk to have a computer that can OS X, Linux, and Windows.
 
  Maybe the unofficial windows ports are more important than we think 
  ;-)
 
 It is important to have easy to install packages.  I find 
 installing source packages trivial,  but I am not the average user.
 My colleges that want an install for OSX dislike need to 
 install xcode, mac ports and compiling the whole deal.
 
 One of these days I will study how Inkscape makes their OS X 
 package and make one for gschem and pcb.
 
 
  I will look into these statistics this evening, to have an 
 informed opinion.
 
 We can't have that ;-P  only uninformed conjecture!
 
 
 Steve
 
 

Yesterday evening I found the following DownLoads (D/L) statistics, until I
got bored:

File   WIN  LIN  MAC  BSD  ***   SF My
 Total  Total

geda-suite-0.0.2.tar.bz210   424-1   820 57

geda-gaf-1.6.1.tar.gz  279  106   2618   420420
verilog-20090923.tar.gz 1032-325 18
verilog-0.9.2.tar.gz 822-119 13
pcb-20091103.tar.gz  841-119 14
ng-spice-rework-20.tar.gz  1722   14-2   276190
gwave2-20090213.tar.gz   821-117 12
gtkwave-3.3.0.tar.gz 751-119 14
gspiceui-v0.9.98.tar.gz  721-115 11
gnucap-2009-12-07-tools.tar.gz  1021-118 14

(incomplete)

IMHO:

1) the 147 k D/Ls looks like a (realistic ?) number of total D/L for all
gEDA related packages and files ever.

2) SF math s*cks !

I hope Launchpad does it's math better.

Just my somewhat more informed opinion ;-)

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-10 Thread Gareth Edwards
On 10 January 2011 00:48, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
 Gareth Edwards wrote:

 But I don't see this as a reason to hide the existence
 of the triage policy from simple bug reporters.


 It's not hidden. It's linked right on the bug reporting page.

 Your argument against a comprehensive bug management page in
 the wiki was the wish to separate bug reporting people from
 those, who do the triage.

No, it was a desire to decouple the processes, not the people.

  This implies to me, that ordinary
 users should be discouraged from doing the triage. And the
 triage policy should be out of their eyes.


The processes are distinct enough to deserve their own pages. Some
people will report bugs. Some people will triage bugs. Some will do
both. The link on the reporting page facilitates that.

Gareth


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-10 Thread Markus Hitter


Am 10.01.2011 um 02:33 schrieb Peter Clifton:


On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 02:18 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:


By the way, the download statistics is interesting:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/stats/timeline? 
dates=2002-01-03+to+2011-01-10


Over the years, the download count integrated to an astonishing  
150.000


To me, the interesting statistic is more:

TOP OS *
Windows
79% of downloaders

https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files//stats/os? 
dates=2003-02-11%20to%202011-01-10


... and a minute later ...


Look at the source downloads for the latest release though:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/pcb/pcb-20100929/ 
pcb-20100929.tar.gz/stats/os


Only 50% Linux downloads, 25% Windows again.


These numbers are very biased, as about all Linux and *BSD  
distributions have some sort of package management system, so there's  
no need to download sources from SourceForge or build binaries by  
hand. Just doing some apt-get or emerge or whatever is much more  
convenient and reliable.


For example, sites like the Ubuntu Popularity Contest show 11'000  
installations with about 1'000 users:


http://popcon2.net/package/geda.html#graph-0


Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/







___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-10 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Peter Clifton wrote:

 The short answer is html + make

This should be easy to convert to 
dokuwiki + make
After all, dokuwiki content is just a set of ascii files. The make file would 
only be needed to distribute the files to the correct target directories. 
The benefit would be a complete separation of content and style.

---)kaiamrtin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak  tel: +49-511-762-2895
Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik  fax: +49-511-762-2211 
Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover   http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
GPG key:http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmkop=get



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-10 Thread Rick

On 1/9/2011 8:33 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 02:18 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:


By the way, the download statistics is interesting:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/stats/timeline?dates=2002-01-03+to+2011-01-10

Over the years, the download count integrated to an astonishing 150.000

To me, the interesting statistic is more:

TOP OS *
Windows
79% of downloaders

https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files//stats/os?dates=2003-02-11%20to%202011-01-10

I wonder how many of those downloaders actually use it.
I used it just yesterday.  I often use gerbv for viewing Gerbers.  I run 
it under Vista and there are some issues.


Rick


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Gareth Edwards
I wouldn't strongly object to a merge but...

On 8 January 2011 23:31, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
 Peter TB Brett wrote:

 Nice.
 Would you object against a merge with Howto report bugs?

 I don't think that one is really needed -- reporting bugs and triaging bugs
 are different jobs.

 Sure, but I'd like to:

 1) not spread bug reporting advice all over the site like we currently do.

I think reporting and triage are two separate processes that are
carried out by two intersecting sets of people. I think there's a good
argument for two separate pages.

If not, it must be /extremely clear/ that they are two separate
processes carried out by different people, otherwise the naive bug
reporter may attempt to triage their own bug.

I do agree there should only be 1 bug *reporting* page though.


 2) suggest, that someone, who reports a bug may also confirm others.
 I imagine, this works better, if the triage

See above. I don't think that necessarily follows. Bug reporting could
be and should be from anyone. Bug triage will be a smaller set of
people.

Cheers
Gareth


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 04:16 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Here is another find: 
   http://geda.seul.org/wiki/gschem-projects
 On the bottom of the page is a link to sourceforge that is supposed to 
 offer some work done for an interactive sub sheet generator. However, 
 the link is dead. I couldn't locate a corresponding report on 
 launchpad, either. Just typed in the bug number (1800913) in launchpads 
 search facility.

Fixed. The SF bugs get imported with an alias, so sf-1800913 might
have found it.

The bug is:

https://launchpad.net/geda/+bug/698670

Aka:
https://launchpad.net/geda/+bug/sf-1800913

Or shorter.. since you don't have to explicitly specify the project:

https://launchpad.net/bugs/698670
https://launchpad.net/bugs/sf-1800913


 ---)kaimartin(---

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Gareth Edwards wrote:

 Bug reporting could
 be and should be from anyone. Bug triage will be a smaller set of
 people.

For full triage you have to be a member of the bug team (geda-bugs, or 
pcb-bugs). Else, you get no edit buttons next to the importance button.
I'd expect, that this is configurable and the status can also be made 
inaccessible to simple users (Peter C., is this so?)

However, geda/pcb as a project is not exactly overrun by potential 
contributers and bug reporters. There is no need to add more barriers.
To the contrary, users need to be encouraged to participate. Triage is
itself is not very release critical. Worst case that might happen is a
severe bug that gets rated below par. But if it is really severe, it
will surface again.

If a user has successfully followed the bug report page of geda
and has not seen triage mentioned, he or she may still be tempted to 
change the status flags of this and other bugs -- Simply because there
are edit buttons on the status.  

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Peter Clifton wrote:

 Fixed. 

Thanks.


 The SF bugs get imported with an alias, so sf-1800913 might
 have found it.

Ok, next time I'll try to search with sf-prefix.

Here is another find:
The link page of pcb at gpleda.org still contains now obsolete links to
sourceforge: second point at http://pcb.gpleda.org/links.html

In addition, the menu of the main page of pcb at gpleda contains an
entry Sourceforge with the sub entry Project Page, both of which 
link to the same source page. IMHO these are obsolete.

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 19:18 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Gareth Edwards wrote:
 
  Bug reporting could
  be and should be from anyone. Bug triage will be a smaller set of
  people.
 
 For full triage you have to be a member of the bug team (geda-bugs, or 
 pcb-bugs). Else, you get no edit buttons next to the importance button.
 I'd expect, that this is configurable and the status can also be made 
 inaccessible to simple users (Peter C., is this so?)

No, you need to be a bug contact or owner of the project, and that is
not configurable. 

If we wanted access more open, we _could_ make the bug team open without
any confirmation by an administrator, but I'm not inclined to do that.

 However, geda/pcb as a project is not exactly overrun by potential 
 contributers and bug reporters. There is no need to add more barriers.
 To the contrary, users need to be encouraged to participate. Triage is
 itself is not very release critical. Worst case that might happen is a
 severe bug that gets rated below par. But if it is really severe, it
 will surface again.

Actually, and perhaps perversely, I think adding the barrier to team
membership may be a psychological encouragement to participate actively.

In order to join the team, the person joining has been acknowledged and
given an implicit degree of approval from the administrators of the
project. When I have been in this position for other projects. (E.g
membership of the Ubuntu-X swat team), it gave me both a positive
feeling, and also reassured me that it was ok to make those changes
membership unlocked.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 19:46 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

 Here is another find:
 The link page of pcb at gpleda.org still contains now obsolete links to
 sourceforge: second point at http://pcb.gpleda.org/links.html

I removed the text about going there for bugs, but left the link for
now.

 In addition, the menu of the main page of pcb at gpleda contains an
 entry Sourceforge with the sub entry Project Page, both of which 
 link to the same source page. IMHO these are obsolete.

The second link is really just manual line-wrapping of the first. I
added a link to the Launchpad project page for PCB, and removed the
forced line-wrap on both.

Better?

At some point I'd love to see the PCB pages revamped wholesale to
improve their impact and visual appeal. Whatever ends up being done, I'd
like the whole gpleda.org site to look consistent.

 ---)kaimartin(---

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Peter Clifton wrote:

 For full triage you have to be a member of the bug team (geda-bugs, or 
 pcb-bugs). Else, you get no edit buttons next to the importance button.
 I'd expect, that this is configurable and the status can also be made 
 inaccessible to simple users (Peter C., is this so?)
 
 No, you need to be a bug contact or owner of the project, and that is
 not configurable. 

Hmm, I also meant the opposite: Is is it possible to make the status 
inaccessible to users not in a special group? Just in case some status
edit war is creeping up...
 

 Actually, and perhaps perversely, I think adding the barrier to team
 membership may be a psychological encouragement to participate actively.
 
 In order to join the team, the person joining has been acknowledged and
 given an implicit degree of approval from the administrators of the
 project. When I have been in this position for other projects. (E.g
 membership of the Ubuntu-X swat team), it gave me both a positive
 feeling, and also reassured me that it was ok to make those changes
 membership unlocked.

fair enough. But I don't see this as a reason to hide the existence 
of the triage policy from simple bug reporters.

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Sunday 09 January 2011 19:07:37 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Peter Clifton wrote:
  For full triage you have to be a member of the bug team (geda-bugs, or
  pcb-bugs). Else, you get no edit buttons next to the importance button.
  I'd expect, that this is configurable and the status can also be made
  inaccessible to simple users (Peter C., is this so?)
  
  No, you need to be a bug contact or owner of the project, and that is
  not configurable.
 
 Hmm, I also meant the opposite: Is is it possible to make the status
 inaccessible to users not in a special group? Just in case some status
 edit war is creeping up...

If a status edit war occurs, bug status to be set to Opinion? ;-)

 Peter


-- 
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:07 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Peter Clifton wrote:
 
  For full triage you have to be a member of the bug team (geda-bugs, or 
  pcb-bugs). Else, you get no edit buttons next to the importance button.
  I'd expect, that this is configurable and the status can also be made 
  inaccessible to simple users (Peter C., is this so?)
  
  No, you need to be a bug contact or owner of the project, and that is
  not configurable. 
 
 Hmm, I also meant the opposite: Is is it possible to make the status 
 inaccessible to users not in a special group? Just in case some status
 edit war is creeping up...

I don't think it is possible to restrict access to statuses. A couple
are reserved for geda-bugs team only, such as Triaged and WontFix.

If anyone starts an edit fight, we need to tell them to stop. If that
doesn't suffice - we'll have to refer it to the Launchpad admins to
investigate and possibly warn the user.

Here is the rationale from:
http://blog.launchpad.net/general/of-bugs-and-statuses

Access Restrictions
For the most part, Launchpad is liberal as to who can set bugs to a
status; we would rather allow people to help garden the bug statuses
than force them to ask permission to do so. There are two statuses,
however, which are restricted to the project’s bug contacts and
registrant: Won’t Fix, and Triaged.

  * Won’t Fix is restricted for a very specific reason: it is
intended to represent an official denial, and therefore should
really only be pronounced by a member of the project.
  * Triaged is restricted because it intends to capture confirmation
by an accredited QA person who has verified that enough
information has now been gathered about the issue that it can go
straight into a developer’s work queue.


[snip]

 fair enough. But I don't see this as a reason to hide the existence 
 of the triage policy from simple bug reporters.

No - it will help them to understand what status their bug has been
given, and is thus useful, even if they don't participate in triage
themselves.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Gareth Edwards
On 9 January 2011 19:07, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:

 But I don't see this as a reason to hide the existence
 of the triage policy from simple bug reporters.


It's not hidden. It's linked right on the bug reporting page.

/GDE


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Gareth Edwards wrote:

 But I don't see this as a reason to hide the existence
 of the triage policy from simple bug reporters.

 
 It's not hidden. It's linked right on the bug reporting page.

Your argument against a comprehensive bug management page in 
the wiki was the wish to separate bug reporting people from 
those, who do the triage. This implies to me, that ordinary
users should be discouraged from doing the triage. And the
triage policy should be out of their eyes. 

Note, triage by users not part of the bug team can only affect
the status. They will not be able to increase, or decrease
the importance. I see no much harm they can do, but a potential
for good input. Their confirmation flags and affects-me will
make it easier for developers to spot the most burning issues.

The average user who reports a bug must also triage a bug. The
less users do the triage thing, the more of this job will stay 
with the developers.

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Peter Clifton wrote:

 Here is another find:
 The link page of pcb at gpleda.org still contains now obsolete links to
 sourceforge: second point at http://pcb.gpleda.org/links.html
 
 I removed the text about going there for bugs, but left the link for
 now.
 

The project description in sourceforge should be supplemented with a note
that the project has moved to gpleda.org. The last news item on 
sourceforge is from 2006. To the uninformed layman this might smell 
like a dead project.

By the way, the download statistics is interesting:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/stats/timeline?dates=2002-01-03+to+2011-01-10

Over the years, the download count integrated to an astonishing 150.000 

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 02:18 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

 By the way, the download statistics is interesting:
 https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/stats/timeline?dates=2002-01-03+to+2011-01-10
 
 Over the years, the download count integrated to an astonishing 150.000 

To me, the interesting statistic is more:

TOP OS *
Windows
79% of downloaders

https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files//stats/os?dates=2003-02-11%20to%202011-01-10

I wonder how many of those downloaders actually use it.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 02:18 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Peter Clifton wrote:

 Over the years, the download count integrated to an astonishing 150.000 

Look at the source downloads for the latest release though:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/pcb/pcb-20100929/pcb-20100929.tar.gz/stats/os

Only 50% Linux downloads, 25% Windows again.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Peter Clifton wrote:

 At some point I'd love to see the PCB pages revamped wholesale to
 improve their impact and visual appeal. Whatever ends up being done,
 I'd like the whole gpleda.org site to look consistent.

Me too!
Like I mentioned before, dokuwiki can easily do a lot better than what
the geda wiki currently looks like. With dokuwiki rendered style is 
almost completely orthogonal to content and managed by cascaded style 
sheets. Given admin privileges you can have many of the navigation and 
eye candy goodies modern web design likes to present.

What web engine that drives the pcb pages? Is it some kind of CMS or 
simply hand written HTML?
 
---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 02:47 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

 What web engine that drives the pcb pages? Is it some kind of CMS or 
 simply hand written HTML?

Web-sources are here:
http://git.gpleda.org/?p=pcbhtdocs.git;a=tree

The short answer is html + make

See:
http://git.gpleda.org/?p=pcbhtdocs.git;a=blob;f=Makefile

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Bert Timmerman
Hi Peter, 

 -Original Message-
 From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org 
 [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Peter Clifton
 Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 2:35 AM
 To: k...@lilalaser.de; gEDA user mailing list
 Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage
 
 On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 02:18 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
  Peter Clifton wrote:
 
  Over the years, the download count integrated to an astonishing 
  150.000
 
 Look at the source downloads for the latest release though:
 
 https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/pcb/pcb-20100929/pc
 b-20100929.tar.gz/stats/os
 
 Only 50% Linux downloads, 25% Windows again.
 
 --
 Peter Clifton
 
 Electrical Engineering Division,
 Engineering Department,
 University of Cambridge,
 9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
 Cambridge
 CB3 0FA
 
 Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
 Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
 
 

Maybe we are targetting the wrong OS ;-(

Maybe the unofficial windows ports are more important than we think ;-)

I will look into these statistics this evening, to have an informed opinion.

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-09 Thread Steven Michalske

 Maybe we are targetting the wrong OS ;-(


Nope, I like my mac os install,  and engineering colleges are seeing a
large uptick in mac usage in colleges.
It is a perk to have a computer that can OS X, Linux, and Windows.

 Maybe the unofficial windows ports are more important than we think ;-)

It is important to have easy to install packages.  I find installing
source packages trivial,  but I am not the average user.
My colleges that want an install for OSX dislike need to install
xcode, mac ports and compiling the whole deal.

One of these days I will study how Inkscape makes their OS X package
and make one for gschem and pcb.


 I will look into these statistics this evening, to have an informed opinion.

We can't have that ;-P  only uninformed conjecture!


Steve


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Gareth Edwards
On 7 January 2011 10:14, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
 Pick a bug from here:
 https://launchpad.net/geda/+bugs?search=Searchfield.status=New  (gEDA)
 or:
 https://launchpad.net/pcb/+bugs?search=Searchfield.status=New   (pcb)


 Grab git HEAD of whichever package the bug is in (if you don't have it
 already), and try to confirm whether the bug is still present or not.

 Bug present: New - Confirmed
 Bug absent: Make a comment - set bug to Invalid,
                                        Fix released, or
                                        Incomplete...
            depending on how confident you are that the bug was bogus,
            fixed by some commit since the bug reported, or Incomplete
            if you ask the reporter a question which requires answering.

Does it make sense to move (other peoples) Wishlist items to
Confirmed, or just leave them as New?  Just thinking these might be a
lot more subjective than bug reports.

Cheers
Gareth


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 19:16 +, Gareth Edwards wrote:

 Does it make sense to move (other peoples) Wishlist items to
 Confirmed, or just leave them as New?  Just thinking these might be a
 lot more subjective than bug reports.

I'd suggest that anyone who also wishes the same should tick the bug
affects me option, so we get an idea of the demand. That feature was
designed to avoid lots of ME TOO, +1 comments on bugs.

Perhaps leave the status update for developers who are sufficiently
familiar with the design issues to decide if the wishlist item is a
Confirmed, WontFix or Opinion.

It seems there is no need to confirm that someone wishes something ;)

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Saturday 08 January 2011 19:33:40 Gareth Edwards wrote:
 On 8 January 2011 19:28, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
  On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 19:16 +, Gareth Edwards wrote:
  Does it make sense to move (other peoples) Wishlist items to
  Confirmed, or just leave them as New?  Just thinking these might be a
  lot more subjective than bug reports.
  
  I'd suggest that anyone who also wishes the same should tick the bug
  affects me option, so we get an idea of the demand. That feature was
  designed to avoid lots of ME TOO, +1 comments on bugs.
  
  Perhaps leave the status update for developers who are sufficiently
  familiar with the design issues to decide if the wishlist item is a
  Confirmed, WontFix or Opinion.
 
 Yes, this sound like a good process.
 
 Think it's worthwhile me trying to capture the process on the wiki
 somewhere or is it transient until we complete the first pass of the
 migration? It's spread over 3 or 4 email threads now and my email
 filing sucks. :)
 

Yes, it is definitely worthwhile to try and capture the process on the wiki 
somewhere!  Very much so!  Please do!

  Peter :-)

-- 
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 19:33 +, Gareth Edwards wrote:

 Think it's worthwhile me trying to capture the process on the wiki
 somewhere or is it transient until we complete the first pass of the
 migration? It's spread over 3 or 4 email threads now and my email
 filing sucks. :)

Writing a bug triage guide would be handy I think.. thanks! We can
update it if and when we find problems with how things are working.

Realistically, the migration is done already.. we are just catching up
with bug triage work which has been very neglected in the past. I'm
currently working on writing a robot to update status of bugs as we
commit related code. See:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/700413

and our mindless helper:
https://launchpad.net/~gpleda-launchpad-robot

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:40:49 +
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:

 On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 19:33 +, Gareth Edwards wrote:
 Writing a bug triage guide would be handy I think.. thanks! We can
 update it if and when we find problems with how things are working.

Yes, it would be useful to have a bug triage guide.

 Realistically, the migration is done already.. we are just catching up
 with bug triage work which has been very neglected in the past.

I'll just take this moment to say thanks for making the switch to
Launchpad!  I've used Launchpad a little bit in the past, but after
using it for only a little while with the pcb project, I find using
Launchpad EXTREMELY PLEASANT! ... especially compared with SourceForge.

Regards,
Colin


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Gareth Edwards wrote:

 Think it's worthwhile me trying to capture the process on the wiki
 somewhere

IMHO, bug reporting is worth a dedicated page in the wiki.
I just started one at: 
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:howto_report_bugs?#bug_trackers

Feel free to add a section on bug triage and etiquette.

BTW, there about 100 links to source forge in the wiki
 http://geda.seul.org/wiki/?do=searchid=sourceforge
Many of them are obsolete since pcb and now also the bug trackers
have moved somewhere else. I'll try to catch them...

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Gareth Edwards
Hi

On 8 January 2011 21:26, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
 Gareth Edwards wrote:

 Think it's worthwhile me trying to capture the process on the wiki
 somewhere

 IMHO, bug reporting is worth a dedicated page in the wiki.
 I just started one at:
 http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:howto_report_bugs?#bug_trackers

 Feel free to add a section on bug triage and etiquette.

I'm already half way through writing one elsewhere. I'll add a link.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Saturday 08 January 2011 21:26:59 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Gareth Edwards wrote:
  Think it's worthwhile me trying to capture the process on the wiki
  somewhere
 
 IMHO, bug reporting is worth a dedicated page in the wiki.
 I just started one at:
 http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:howto_report_bugs?#bug_trackers
 
 Feel free to add a section on bug triage and etiquette.
 
 BTW, there about 100 links to source forge in the wiki
  http://geda.seul.org/wiki/?do=searchid=sourceforge
 Many of them are obsolete since pcb and now also the bug trackers
 have moved somewhere else. I'll try to catch them...

Note that http://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/sf-bugnum links to the bug 
which had ID bugnum on Sourceforge.  This is useful. ;-)

  Peter

-- 
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

 BTW, there about 100 links to source forge in the wiki
  http://geda.seul.org/wiki/?do=searchid=sourceforge
 Many of them are obsolete since pcb and now also the bug trackers
 have moved somewhere else. I'll try to catch them...

The hunt led me to http://pcb.gpleda.org/bugs.html
This page needs to be updated, too. It is not part of the wiki. 
So DJ, Ales, or somebody else with privileged write permissions has
to do the changes.

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Gareth Edwards
On 8 January 2011 21:29, Gareth Edwards gar...@edwardsfamily.org.uk wrote:
 Think it's worthwhile me trying to capture the process on the wiki
 somewhere


http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:bug_triage_guide


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Saturday 08 January 2011 22:44:48 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Gareth Edwards wrote:
  http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:bug_triage_guide
 
 Nice.
 Would you object against a merge with Howto report bugs?

I don't think that one is really needed -- reporting bugs and triaging bugs 
are different jobs.  For instance, a large part of the triage guide is about 
what to set importances and statuses to in different situations, whereas for a 
reporter, their bug should always start out as New and Undecided.

Peter

-- 
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Peter TB Brett wrote:

 Nice.
 Would you object against a merge with Howto report bugs?
 
 I don't think that one is really needed -- reporting bugs and triaging bugs 
 are different jobs.

Sure, but I'd like to:

1) not spread bug reporting advice all over the site like we currently do.

2) suggest, that someone, who reports a bug may also confirm others.
I imagine, this works better, if the triage

3) have a single page for all bug related issues. This page can be 
linked to from many other pages. (And potentially from the manuals).

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Saturday 08 January 2011 23:31:43 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Peter TB Brett wrote:
  Nice.
  Would you object against a merge with Howto report bugs?
  
  I don't think that one is really needed -- reporting bugs and triaging
  bugs are different jobs.
 
 Sure, but I'd like to:
 
 1) not spread bug reporting advice all over the site like we currently do.
 
 2) suggest, that someone, who reports a bug may also confirm others.
 I imagine, this works better, if the triage
 
 3) have a single page for all bug related issues. This page can be
 linked to from many other pages. (And potentially from the manuals).

Well, it's up to you.

  Peter

-- 
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 22:38 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

 The hunt led me to http://pcb.gpleda.org/bugs.html
 This page needs to be updated, too. It is not part of the wiki. 
 So DJ, Ales, or somebody else with privileged write permissions has
 to do the changes.

I fixed it.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-08 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Peter Clifton wrote:

 On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 22:38 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
 
 The hunt led me to http://pcb.gpleda.org/bugs.html
 This page needs to be updated, too. It is not part of the wiki. 
 So DJ, Ales, or somebody else with privileged write permissions has
 to do the changes.
 
 I fixed it.

Thanks.

Here is another find: 
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/gschem-projects
On the bottom of the page is a link to sourceforge that is supposed to 
offer some work done for an interactive sub sheet generator. However, 
the link is dead. I couldn't locate a corresponding report on 
launchpad, either. Just typed in the bug number (1800913) in launchpads 
search facility.

---)kaimartin(---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Peter Clifton
Hello everyone,

Peter Brett seems to have gone mad... he's triaging bugs and coding
fixes at an astonishing rate. Rather than our newly imported bugs in
Launchpad sitting abandoned and ignored, they are being FIXED!

There are a lot of bugs which are still New, ie.. haven't been
confirmed or triaged yet, and I'd like to encourage EVERYONE to come and
help with that task.

If everyone did ONE bug, we'd be a _lot_ further on with this job.


Pick a bug from here:
https://launchpad.net/geda/+bugs?search=Searchfield.status=New  (gEDA)
or:
https://launchpad.net/pcb/+bugs?search=Searchfield.status=New   (pcb)


Grab git HEAD of whichever package the bug is in (if you don't have it
already), and try to confirm whether the bug is still present or not.

Bug present: New - Confirmed
Bug absent: Make a comment - set bug to Invalid,
Fix released, or
Incomplete...
depending on how confident you are that the bug was bogus,
fixed by some commit since the bug reported, or Incomplete
if you ask the reporter a question which requires answering.

Does the bug affect you personally?
If so, hit the link about 2-3 inches down the page, under the title,
which lets you state that?

Interested in getting email about progress on this bug?
Hit Subscribe on the right hand toolbar.

Is your name on any bug?
Be sure to link the Sourceforge import with your SF email address to
your proper Launchpad account. Click your name if it isn't already
linked..

For example, Ineiev:
https://launchpad.net/~ineiev-users

Follow the Are you ineiev? link to:
https://launchpad.net/people/+requestmerge?field.dupe_person=ineiev-users


Lets all help with this task.. a lot of hands will make light work.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Friday 07 January 2011 10:14:19 Peter Clifton wrote:
 Grab git HEAD of whichever package the bug is in (if you don't have it
 already), and try to confirm whether the bug is still present or not.
 
 Bug present: New - Confirmed
 Bug absent: Make a comment - set bug to Invalid,
 Fix released, or
 Incomplete...
 depending on how confident you are that the bug was bogus,
 fixed by some commit since the bug reported, or Incomplete
 if you ask the reporter a question which requires answering.
 

Please use Fix released only if the fix has been in a released version (the 
latest release was 1.6.1).  Otherwise, use Fix committed.

Thanks for any help you can give me in ploughing through the backlog!

  Peter

P.S. It is not good form to set your own bug reports to Confirmed. :-P


-- 
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:22:53 +
Peter TB Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk wrote:

 Please use Fix released only if the fix has been in a released
 version (the latest release was 1.6.1).  Otherwise, use Fix
 committed.

Is there any special tag or status indicator I can use for a bug which
has a working bugfix patch attached?  It seems like bugs with a
confirmed fix should be given high priority to get the fix committed to
HEAD.

I am speaking presently about
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699498
which has a working patch that I have been using myself for some time.

Regards,
Colin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Friday 07 January 2011 20:55:31 Colin D Bennett wrote:
 On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:22:53 +
 
 Peter TB Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk wrote:
  Please use Fix released only if the fix has been in a released
  version (the latest release was 1.6.1).  Otherwise, use Fix
  committed.
 
 Is there any special tag or status indicator I can use for a bug which
 has a working bugfix patch attached?  It seems like bugs with a
 confirmed fix should be given high priority to get the fix committed to
 HEAD.
 
 I am speaking presently about
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699498
 which has a working patch that I have been using myself for some time.
 

Well, the usual thing to do in that case is to complain on the mailing list, 
in which case a bug administrator (such as myself) may well go and find 
someone to nag about it.

Cheers,

Peter

-- 
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:14:19 +
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:

 There are a lot of bugs which are still New, ie.. haven't been
 confirmed or triaged yet, and I'd like to encourage EVERYONE to come
 and help with that task.

I have a question regarding the validity of the following bug:

“Make minimum size 1000x1000 mil”
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/699548.

This bug report states that pcb won't let you create a layout less than
1200 mil x 1200 mil.  However I have a layout that is much smaller than
that and have not encountered any restriction or problem yet.

This report is from 2004 and last commented on in 2005, so I am fairly
sure it is _Invalid_.  Can anyone confirm?

Regards,
Colin


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: Bug triage

2011-01-07 Thread DJ Delorie

The minimimum size is still set to 1000, but was never updated when we
switched to centimils, so the smallest board is now limited to 10 mils!

Yes, the GTK sizes dialog still enforces it!


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user