gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
PCB version 20100929 Compiled on Nov 8 2010 at 05:46:11 Debian sid. gtk. - Settings-Only Names - draw a line - hit 'u' for undo. - segfault. -- Stephan ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
Can't confirm that. Tried with git HEAD and 20091103 from ubuntu 10.10 repository (both just with GTK-gui). Kind regards, Felix Am 30.01.2011 14:48, schrieb Stephan Boettcher: PCB version 20100929 Compiled on Nov 8 2010 at 05:46:11 Debian sid. gtk. - Settings-Only Names - draw a line - hit 'u' for undo. - segfault. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 14:48 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: PCB version 20100929 Compiled on Nov 8 2010 at 05:46:11 Debian sid. gtk. - Settings-Only Names - draw a line - hit 'u' for undo. - segfault. Works fine for Gentoo AMD64, tested empty board and tut1.pcb. PCB version 20100929 (GTK) ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 15:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote: On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 14:48 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: PCB version 20100929 Compiled on Nov 8 2010 at 05:46:11 Debian sid. gtk. - Settings-Only Names - draw a line - hit 'u' for undo. valgrind tells me: ==3992== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 ==3992==at 0x42B5A8: ActionUndo (action.c:6356) ==3992==by 0x4A3B50: hid_actionv (actions.c:246) ==3992==by 0x4A3F47: hid_parse_actionstring (actions.c:330) ==3992==by 0x4D5EF9: ghid_menu_cb (gui-top-window.c:633) ==3992==by 0x7F1198B: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:767) ==3992==by 0x7F24088: signal_emit_unlocked_R (gsignal.c:3252) ==3992==by 0x7F2D4A5: g_signal_emit_valist (gsignal.c:2983) ==3992==by 0x7F2D65E: g_signal_emit (gsignal.c:3040) ==3992==by 0x5E8E3F2: _gtk_action_emit_activate (gtkaction.c:794) ==3992==by 0x5E8EDA3: closure_accel_activate (gtkaction.c:1764) ==3992==by 0x7F1198B: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:767) ==3992==by 0x7F24088: signal_emit_unlocked_R (gsignal.c:3252) ==3992== Ignore the line-numbers, I'm running my PCB+GL branch. I didn't get a segfault, but that might just be down to luck. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de writes: On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 14:48 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: PCB version 20100929 Compiled on Nov 8 2010 at 05:46:11 Debian sid. gtk. - Settings-Only Names - draw a line - hit 'u' for undo. - segfault. Works fine for Gentoo AMD64, tested empty board and tut1.pcb. PCB version 20100929 (GTK) Ok, I tried again, empty board, and yes, the segfault does not happen when a line draw is completed (with the middle mouse button). It only happens when I hit u (undo) after drawing a track segment, but did not terminate the draw (with middle mouse button). -- Stephan ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 15:22 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: It only happens when I hit u (undo) after drawing a track segment, but did not terminate the draw (with middle mouse button). That matches the same set of steps where I can trigger the valgrind warning. As an added data-point, I was able to reproduce with Only names switched off when I started line-drawing, but switched it on mid-way, before I hit undo. A cursory glance didn't suggest what might be wrong yet.. please file a bug at: http://launchpad.net/pcb/+filebug -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
Stephan Boettcher wrote: PCB version 20100929 Compiled on Nov 8 2010 at 05:46:11 Debian sid. gtk. - Settings-Only Names - draw a line - hit 'u' for undo. - segfault. I can confirm for pcb recently compiled from git. This is the specific sequence I did to achieve segfault: 1) Settings - Only_Names 2) choose the line tool 3) left mouse click on canvas 4) left mouse click on canvas 5) [u] to undo -- immediate segfault. No other errors reported If I ended the track with [esc] no segfault would occur. I noticed, that the same procedure with pcb from squeeze does not segfault. But it still behaves a bit strange on undo: The next segment seems to start somewhere off canvas. ---)kaimartin(--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk writes: On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 15:22 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: It only happens when I hit u (undo) after drawing a track segment, but did not terminate the draw (with middle mouse button). That matches the same set of steps where I can trigger the valgrind warning. As an added data-point, I was able to reproduce with Only names switched off when I started line-drawing, but switched it on mid-way, before I hit undo. A cursory glance didn't suggest what might be wrong yet.. please file a bug at: http://launchpad.net/pcb/+filebug That site shows a white page with a [continue] button, and then I click on it, it says 'Invalid OpenID transaction'. And when I turn on Javascript, it does nothing more helpfu either. And anyway, I do not have an account with launchpad, and I don't think I'd want one. Sorry. -- Stephan ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Re: gEDA-user: PCB bug: only names, draw a line, undo: segfault
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 15:49 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: A cursory glance didn't suggest what might be wrong yet.. please file a bug at: http://launchpad.net/pcb/+filebug That site shows a white page with a [continue] button, and then I click on it, it says 'Invalid OpenID transaction'. And when I turn on Javascript, it does nothing more helpfu either. And anyway, I do not have an account with launchpad, and I don't think I'd want one. Sorry. That is unfortunate, as you won't be able to participate in our normal bug tracking system. Email on the list is fine.. but it does tend to get lost or forgotten. (At least the bug trackers is a nice structured place for us to forget bugs ;)). If you decided you did want to sign up to help, try visiting here before that other URL: https://login.launchpad.net/ -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
