Re: gEDA-user: PCB multiple footprint selection

2007-01-29 Thread Ed & Angie S.
Perfect.  Thank you John and Phil.  In spite of being pretty far along with 
component placement, I hadn't noticed and tried that button yet.


Ed

- Original Message - 
From: "John Luciani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "gEDA user mailing list" 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB multiple footprint selection



On 1/29/07, Ed & Angie S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

At first,I was expecting the selection to only take components on the 
active

layer.  Then I thought turning off the opposite layer would disable the
component selection on the opposite side of the board but that didn't 
work
either.  I checked the release notes for newer versions of the software 
and
didn't see that this issue had been covered but, I was still wondering if 
a

newer version might have improved this behavior or if someone had a
suggestion for working around it more effectively.


In my PCB version there is a button labeled "far side". Clicking "far
side" makes
the components on the opposite side of the board invisible and 
unselectable.


(* jcl *)


--
http://www.luciani.org


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user






___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: PCB multiple footprint selection

2007-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]



John Luciani wrote:

In my PCB version there is a button labeled "far side". Clicking "far
side" makes
the components on the opposite side of the board invisible and 
unselectable.


Version 20060822 has this feature.  Also this version incorporates a lot 
of user interface refinements over 20050127.


best, phil


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: PCB multiple footprint selection

2007-01-29 Thread John Luciani

On 1/29/07, Ed & Angie S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


At first,I was expecting the selection to only take components on the active
layer.  Then I thought turning off the opposite layer would disable the
component selection on the opposite side of the board but that didn't work
either.  I checked the release notes for newer versions of the software and
didn't see that this issue had been covered but, I was still wondering if a
newer version might have improved this behavior or if someone had a
suggestion for working around it more effectively.


In my PCB version there is a button labeled "far side". Clicking "far
side" makes
the components on the opposite side of the board invisible and unselectable.

(* jcl *)


--
http://www.luciani.org


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: PCB multiple footprint selection

2007-01-29 Thread Ed & Angie S.
I'm using PCB version 20050127 which is comes packaged with the stable version 
of Debian (Sarge).  When I select a group of components on one side of the 
board using the mouse to draw a square with the select tool, components on the 
other side of the board also get selected.  Thus, when I move the footprints to 
a different location, footprints on both solder side and component side move.  
This makes it more difficult to move footprints on one side that have strict 
placement requirements relative to each other.  I can see where it would be 
useful to move components on both sides simultaneously, however, I really need 
to be able to move groups of footprints on only one side at a time as well.  I 
can select multiple components by shift-middle button click which does work 
pretty well if there are not many components that need to be selected.

At first,I was expecting the selection to only take components on the active 
layer.  Then I thought turning off the opposite layer would disable the 
component selection on the opposite side of the board but that didn't work 
either.  I checked the release notes for newer versions of the software and 
didn't see that this issue had been covered but, I was still wondering if a 
newer version might have improved this behavior or if someone had a suggestion 
for working around it more effectively.

Thanks for listening.

Ed

___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user