Re: gEDA-user: going multi core

2011-01-27 Thread Peter Clifton
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 07:36 +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> - Original message -
> > just one such core. Can I expect a spectacular speed-up of gschem 
> > and pcb? Or are they throttled by the graphic card anyway?
> 
> gschem is a single-threaded application. It runs on one core, no matter how 
> many you have.  So no, don't expect a big speed up.

Your X11 server will have a whole other core to run in if things get
taxing.

In any case, we are doing something wrong if gschem is consuming 100%
CPU on one core, and X11 is doing similar!


-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: going multi core

2011-01-26 Thread Peter TB Brett
- Original message -
> just one such core. Can I expect a spectacular speed-up of gschem 
> and pcb? Or are they throttled by the graphic card anyway?

gschem is a single-threaded application. It runs on one core, no matter how 
many you have.  So no, don't expect a big speed up.

 Peter

-- 
Peter Brett 
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre


___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


Re: gEDA-user: going multi core

2011-01-26 Thread George M. Gallant, Jr.

If the new system is anything like this list, you should expect
a significant slowdown as the CPUs argue amongst themselves
as to who gets to do what, when and how not to do something.

I have not seen a significant advantage to single process geda tools
execution. I suspect that some of the backend graphics might benefit.
It is while doing long CPU intensive operations (FPGA synthesis) having
the other cores free is really appreciated.

George

On 01/26/2011 09:26 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

There is going to be a new desktop on my desktop at work!
It is going to be the the usual upgrade in computational power:
More memory, more storage, more speed. Speed is supposed to be
delivered by four cores (AMD athlon). My current desktop contains
just one such core. Can I expect a spectacular speed-up of gschem
and pcb? Or are they throttled by the graphic card anyway?

---<)kaimartin(>---




___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


gEDA-user: going multi core

2011-01-26 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
There is going to be a new desktop on my desktop at work!
It is going to be the the usual upgrade in computational power:
More memory, more storage, more speed. Speed is supposed to be 
delivered by four cores (AMD athlon). My current desktop contains 
just one such core. Can I expect a spectacular speed-up of gschem 
and pcb? Or are they throttled by the graphic card anyway?

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53



___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user