Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-27 Thread Steve Reinhardt

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#review5980
---


Looks much nicer. Thanks for the changes!  Sorry for the long wait for the 
review.

Nothing big, just could use a couple more comments I think.


configs/common/CacheConfig.py
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#comment5218

a comment explaining the need/purpose for this class would be nice



configs/common/CacheConfig.py
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#comment5219

please add a comment here explaining that there is an assumption being made 
on how the external memory system names its ports



ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#comment5217

so does this require you to edit the file to replace /XXX/abs-path-to?  
couldn't this path be read from an environment variable, or perhaps you could 
leave it as a relative path so it would work if you ran from the gem5 
directory?


- Steve Reinhardt


On March 3, 2015, 5:07 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
 ---
 
 (Updated March 3, 2015, 5:07 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Default.
 
 
 Repository: gem5
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
 ---
 config: Support full-system with SST's memory system
 
 This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
 an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
 memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/common/Options.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/example/fs.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
   src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
 
 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Curtis Dunham
 


___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-27 Thread Curtis Dunham

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---

(Updated March 27, 2015, 10:27 p.m.)


Review request for Default.


Repository: gem5


Description
---

Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
---
config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.


Diffs (updated)
-

  src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
  configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
  configs/common/Options.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
  configs/example/fs.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
  ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
  configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
  configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Curtis Dunham

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-27 Thread Curtis Dunham


 On March 27, 2015, 6:28 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
  ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py, line 93
  http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/5/?file=43877#file43877line93
 
  so does this require you to edit the file to replace 
  /XXX/abs-path-to?  couldn't this path be read from an environment 
  variable, or perhaps you could leave it as a relative path so it would work 
  if you ran from the gem5 directory?

Yes, it does.  It can work as relative; I will change it to that.


- Curtis


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#review5980
---


On March 27, 2015, 10:27 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
 ---
 
 (Updated March 27, 2015, 10:27 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Default.
 
 
 Repository: gem5
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
 ---
 config: Support full-system with SST's memory system
 
 This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
 an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
 memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
   configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
   configs/common/Options.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
   configs/example/fs.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
   ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
   configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
   configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a7285d6197eb0d8f1642e6cdb7a21aa1ff6310e 
 
 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Curtis Dunham
 


___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-03 Thread Curtis Dunham via gem5-dev

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---

(Updated March 4, 2015, 12:56 a.m.)


Review request for Default.


Repository: gem5


Description
---

Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
---
config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.


Diffs (updated)
-

  configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/Options.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/example/fs.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
  src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  src/mem/ExternalSlave.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Curtis Dunham

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-03 Thread Curtis Dunham via gem5-dev

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---

(Updated March 4, 2015, 1:04 a.m.)


Review request for Default.


Repository: gem5


Description
---

Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
---
config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.


Diffs (updated)
-

  configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/Options.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/example/fs.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
  src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Curtis Dunham

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-03 Thread Curtis Dunham via gem5-dev

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---

(Updated March 4, 2015, 12:47 a.m.)


Review request for Default.


Repository: gem5


Description
---

Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
---
config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.


Diffs (updated)
-

  configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/Options.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/example/fs.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
  src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  src/mem/ExternalSlave.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Curtis Dunham

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-03 Thread Curtis Dunham via gem5-dev

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---

(Updated March 4, 2015, 1:07 a.m.)


Review request for Default.


Repository: gem5


Description
---

Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
---
config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.


Diffs (updated)
-

  configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/common/Options.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  configs/example/fs.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
  ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
  src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Curtis Dunham

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-03 Thread Curtis Dunham via gem5-dev


 On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:32 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
  Took me longer to review this just because I'm not sure what to think of 
  it.  It's not pretty, but I don't have better ideas, so it's hard to object.
  
  One thing that bothers me is that, while it's noble to try and generalize 
  things, despite the generic-sounding --external-memory-system switch, 
  many of the low-level details seem very sst-specific (like 
  'port_type=sst' as an obvious one).  Would it be more appropriate just to 
  call the option --sst-memory?
  
  Also, the ExternalCache thing looks like it should be a subclass, even 
  though it's just a function.  I can see how the function is more 
  convenient, but making it a subclass would allow some better encapsulation 
  of the cpu_side __getattr__/__setattr__ hack.
  
  These are just general thoughts though... I'm very interested in others' 
  input.
 
 Curtis Dunham wrote:
 There is some truth to this complaint.  I think there is a little room 
 for improvement, though.

It's ready for another look at diff r5.


- Curtis


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#review5914
---


On March 4, 2015, 1:07 a.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
 ---
 
 (Updated March 4, 2015, 1:07 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Default.
 
 
 Repository: gem5
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
 ---
 config: Support full-system with SST's memory system
 
 This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
 an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
 memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   configs/common/CacheConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/common/FSConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/common/MemConfig.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/common/Options.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   configs/example/fs.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
   ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
   src/dev/arm/RealView.py 8a20e2a1562debfc20b92be4581457c4147b3733 
 
 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Curtis Dunham
 


___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-03-03 Thread Curtis Dunham via gem5-dev


 On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:32 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
  Took me longer to review this just because I'm not sure what to think of 
  it.  It's not pretty, but I don't have better ideas, so it's hard to object.
  
  One thing that bothers me is that, while it's noble to try and generalize 
  things, despite the generic-sounding --external-memory-system switch, 
  many of the low-level details seem very sst-specific (like 
  'port_type=sst' as an obvious one).  Would it be more appropriate just to 
  call the option --sst-memory?
  
  Also, the ExternalCache thing looks like it should be a subclass, even 
  though it's just a function.  I can see how the function is more 
  convenient, but making it a subclass would allow some better encapsulation 
  of the cpu_side __getattr__/__setattr__ hack.
  
  These are just general thoughts though... I'm very interested in others' 
  input.

There is some truth to this complaint.  I think there is a little room for 
improvement, though.


 On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:32 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
  configs/common/CacheConfig.py, line 130
  http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/1/?file=43775#file43775line130
 
  I assume this naming is also specific to sst

Not here.

The naming just has to agree with the configuration on the other side, which 
in this case is the ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py in this patchset.  However as 
long as any other simulator we hook up with is cool with the same naming, it 
doesn't need to be changed.


 On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:32 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
  configs/common/CacheConfig.py, line 50
  http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/1/?file=43775#file43775line50
 
  This seems obviously specific to sst here

Correct that port_type=sst is SST specific because the 
ext/sst/Ext{Master,Slave} code registers a handler for handler_name sst.  
Perhaps --external-memory-system could take a string argument that could be 
stuck here?  We'd use --external-memory-system=sst on the command line.


 On Feb. 25, 2015, 4:32 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
  src/mem/ExternalSlave.py, line 57
  http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/1/?file=43782#file43782line57
 
  To me, this clearly straddles the line between clever and 
  horrifying :).  If nothing else, it would be nice to put these in an 
  ExternalCache subclass.

Clever/Horrifying... Yes. :)

My concern here is that creating a new class doesn't seem to solve the problem. 
 As best I can tell, you just end up moving this unsightly hack to the new 
class instead.  But the value of not having to create new conditional 
statements to set either port (for external memory) or cpu_side (for gem5's 
internal caches) seems worth this bit of nastiness.


- Curtis


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#review5914
---


On Feb. 20, 2015, 6:47 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 20, 2015, 6:47 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Default.
 
 
 Repository: gem5
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
 ---
 config: Support full-system with SST's memory system
 
 This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
 an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
 memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   configs/common/CacheConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/common/FSConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/common/MemConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/common/Options.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/example/fs.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
   src/dev/arm/RealView.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   src/mem/ExternalSlave.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
 
 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Curtis Dunham
 


___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-02-25 Thread Steve Reinhardt via gem5-dev

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#review5914
---


Took me longer to review this just because I'm not sure what to think of it.  
It's not pretty, but I don't have better ideas, so it's hard to object.

One thing that bothers me is that, while it's noble to try and generalize 
things, despite the generic-sounding --external-memory-system switch, many of 
the low-level details seem very sst-specific (like 'port_type=sst' as an 
obvious one).  Would it be more appropriate just to call the option 
--sst-memory?

Also, the ExternalCache thing looks like it should be a subclass, even though 
it's just a function.  I can see how the function is more convenient, but 
making it a subclass would allow some better encapsulation of the cpu_side 
__getattr__/__setattr__ hack.

These are just general thoughts though... I'm very interested in others' input.


configs/common/CacheConfig.py
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#comment5182

This seems obviously specific to sst here



configs/common/CacheConfig.py
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#comment5183

I assume this naming is also specific to sst



src/mem/ExternalSlave.py
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/#comment5184

To me, this clearly straddles the line between clever and horrifying 
:).  If nothing else, it would be nice to put these in an ExternalCache 
subclass.


- Steve Reinhardt


On Feb. 20, 2015, 10:47 a.m., Curtis Dunham wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 20, 2015, 10:47 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Default.
 
 
 Repository: gem5
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
 ---
 config: Support full-system with SST's memory system
 
 This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
 an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
 memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   configs/common/CacheConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/common/FSConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/common/MemConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/common/Options.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   configs/example/fs.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
   src/dev/arm/RealView.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
   src/mem/ExternalSlave.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
 
 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Curtis Dunham
 


___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


[gem5-dev] Review Request 2668: config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

2015-02-20 Thread Curtis Dunham via gem5-dev

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/
---

Review request for Default.


Repository: gem5


Description
---

Changeset 10709:a3b771cd744c
---
config: Support full-system with SST's memory system

This patch adds an example configuration in ext/sst/tests/ that allows
an SST/gem5 instance to simulate a 4-core AArch64 system with SST's
memHierarchy components providing all the caches and memories.


Diffs
-

  configs/common/CacheConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
  configs/common/FSConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
  configs/common/MemConfig.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
  configs/common/Options.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
  configs/example/fs.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
  ext/sst/tests/test6_arm_4c.py PRE-CREATION 
  src/dev/arm/RealView.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 
  src/mem/ExternalSlave.py c6cb94a14fea4c59780d73d1623d7031bcede6af 

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2668/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Curtis Dunham

___
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev