Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess

2010-08-09 Thread Joel Hestness
Is there a way for me to ship this, or does someone else need to push it
to the repo?
  Thanks,
  Joel


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Steve Reinhardt ste...@gmail.com wrote:


 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/#review111
 ---

 Ship it!


 - Steve


 On 2010-07-28 16:05:00, Joel Hestness wrote:
 
  ---
  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
  http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/
  ---
 
  (Updated 2010-07-28 16:05:00)
 
 
  Review request for Default.
 
 
  Summary
  ---
 
  TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess
  ./cpu/simple/timing.cc: fix for x86 CDA microop
   - since CDA doesn't read or update memory, completeDataAccess needs to
 handle the case where the current status of the CPU is _status =
 Running
 caused by a request NO_ACCESS
 
  Discarded previous review request (SIMPLE TIMING: when a request is
 NO_ACCESS (x86 CDA microinstruction), TimingSimpleCPU::completeDataAccess
 must still complete)
 
 
  Diffs
  -
 
src/cpu/simple/timing.cc a75564db03c3
 
  Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/diff
 
 
  Testing
  ---
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Joel
 
 




-- 
  Joel Hestness
  PhD Student, Computer Architecture
  Dept. of Computer Science, University of Texas - Austin
  http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~hestness
___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev


Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess

2010-08-09 Thread nathan binkert
 Is there a way for me to ship this, or does someone else need to push it
 to the repo?

Push it to some repo that steve controls and he can push it to the
main repo for you.

  Nate
___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev


Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess

2010-07-29 Thread Steve Reinhardt

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/#review111
---

Ship it!


- Steve


On 2010-07-28 16:05:00, Joel Hestness wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/
 ---
 
 (Updated 2010-07-28 16:05:00)
 
 
 Review request for Default.
 
 
 Summary
 ---
 
 TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess
 ./cpu/simple/timing.cc: fix for x86 CDA microop
  - since CDA doesn't read or update memory, completeDataAccess needs to
handle the case where the current status of the CPU is _status = Running
caused by a request NO_ACCESS
 
 Discarded previous review request (SIMPLE TIMING: when a request is NO_ACCESS 
 (x86 CDA microinstruction), TimingSimpleCPU::completeDataAccess must still 
 complete)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/cpu/simple/timing.cc a75564db03c3 
 
 Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/diff
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Joel
 


___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev


[m5-dev] Review Request: TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess

2010-07-28 Thread Joel Hestness

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/
---

Review request for Default.


Summary
---

TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess
./cpu/simple/timing.cc: fix for x86 CDA microop
 - since CDA doesn't read or update memory, completeDataAccess needs to
   handle the case where the current status of the CPU is _status = Running
   caused by a request NO_ACCESS

Discarded previous review request (SIMPLE TIMING: when a request is NO_ACCESS 
(x86 CDA microinstruction), TimingSimpleCPU::completeDataAccess must still 
complete)


Diffs
-

  src/cpu/simple/timing.cc a75564db03c3 

Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/diff


Testing
---


Thanks,

Joel

___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev


Re: [m5-dev] Review Request: TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess

2010-07-28 Thread Gabe Black

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/#review110
---

Ship it!


Looks good.

- Gabe


On 2010-07-28 16:05:00, Joel Hestness wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/
 ---
 
 (Updated 2010-07-28 16:05:00)
 
 
 Review request for Default.
 
 
 Summary
 ---
 
 TimingCPU: REPOST: Request::NO_ACCESS bypass in completeDataAccess
 ./cpu/simple/timing.cc: fix for x86 CDA microop
  - since CDA doesn't read or update memory, completeDataAccess needs to
handle the case where the current status of the CPU is _status = Running
caused by a request NO_ACCESS
 
 Discarded previous review request (SIMPLE TIMING: when a request is NO_ACCESS 
 (x86 CDA microinstruction), TimingSimpleCPU::completeDataAccess must still 
 complete)
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/cpu/simple/timing.cc a75564db03c3 
 
 Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/66/diff
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Joel
 


___
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev