I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-isis-caps-06.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 27 october 2006 IETF LC Date: 19 october 2006 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready with nits Comments: there are some little details which should be fixed (nothing critical and nothing which cannot be fixed by the RFC editor) : - 1 page 2: I know what is IS-IS but a random reader likely doesn't: add a reference to the ISO IS (i.e., [IS-IS]) in the first sentence. (and perhaps add IS-IS-IP too, cf last comment). - 1 page 2: "two" examples numbered from 1 to 3 (:-)! - 2 page 3: I don't understand the "to prevent TLV looping" but perhaps it is not "TLV" looping? - 3 page 3: I don't like the term "domain flooding scope", it seems a bit redundant to me. - 3 page 4: "stale capabilities information A system" ^^ ", a "? - 9.1 page 6: is ISIS-TE really a normative reference? BTW there is no reference in the text (same for the previous item, there is a nice checker for this: I suggest to use it...) Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: the list of authors doesn't match the list of editors, I expect you looked at the detailed instructions about this in the RFC editor documents. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art