[Gen-art] Gen-art review draft-ietf-sieve-notify-xmpp-07.txt
Having reviewed the changes from -06 to -07 of this draft, this document is still ready for publication as a proposed standard. Joel M. Halpern ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] Re; Gen-Art Review draft-ietf-pkix-2797-bis-06.txrt
I have reviewed the changes between -05 and -06 and still conclude that the document is ready for publication as a proposed standard. Joel M. Halpern ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-trans-07.txt
Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-trans-07.txt Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Review Date: 15 December 2007 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a PS RFC. Thanks, Gonzalo ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-compl-05.txt
Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-compl-05.txt Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Review Date: 15 December 2007 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a PS RFC. Comments: A draft by the same authors (draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-trans-07.txt) expands CMC in the Abstract in the following way: CMC (Certificate Management over CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax)) However, this draft expands it as follows: CMC (Certificate Management over CMS) It would be nice if both drafts were consistent. Thanks, Gonzalo ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-ipdvb-ule-ext-06.txt
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ipdvb-ule-ext-06.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2007-12-13 IETF LC End Date: 2007-12-17 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost Ready Comments: I have many editorial comments so even they can be handled by the RFC Editor IMHO you could publish a new version of the document. In details: - the Table of Contents should have page numbers to be useful - in the TOC page 2 and 5 page 13: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments (this is the standard IETF spelling) - 1 page 3: "to that of ULE"? - 1 page 3: (NPA) address -> (NPA)? (the destination is the NPA) - 1 page 3: addressed by the NPA (I don't like the word addressed here) - 2 page 4: FEC -> Forward Error Detection (FEC) - 2 page 4: remove "(or by Ethernet v2)"? - 2 page 4: the real name of the ISO is "nternational Organization for Standardization" (cf ISO's name on http://www.iso.org/) - 2 page 5: remove "," in "encapsulates PDUs, into"? - 3 page 6: 1536 Decimal -> 1536 decimal - 3 page 6: utilises -> utilizes - 3 page 6: optimisation -> optimization - 3.1 page 8: labelled -> labeled - 3.1 page 8 and others: i.e. -> i.e., - 3.1 page 8 and others: e.g. -> e.g., - 3.2 page 10 and others: I suggest to change PDU-Length-1 into PDU-1-Length, etc. - 3.2 page 10: spurious "_" in "(LT=00)_" - 3.3 page 12: synchronised -> synchronized - 5 page 13: annexe -> annex (and BTW it is an appendix) - 7.2 page 14: ISO real name again... Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art