[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 19 Aug 2010
Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for this week: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-100819-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html The standard template is included below. Thanks, Mary. --- I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: Reviewer: Review Date: IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07.txt
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-08.txt Definition of IETF Working Group Document States Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 20-August-2010 IETF LC End Date: N/A IESG Telechat date: 2010-08-26 Summary: This document is still ready for publication as an Informational RFC ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] review: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-rfc5081bis-05
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-rfc5081bis-05 Using OpenPGP Keys for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authentication Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 20-August-2010 IETF LC End Date: 2010-09-13 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC Major issues: Minor issues: As indicated by ID Nits, presumably the reference to RFC 4366 in section 3.1 should be replaced by a reference to RFC 5246. Nits/editorial comments: I presume that the authors wish to thank Alfred Hoenes for his suggestions, rather than for their suggestions? (Given Alfred's history of thorough reviews, acknowledging him with a grammatical error just seems wrong.) ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-rfc5081bis-05
On 08/20/2010 06:01 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. [...] Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC Major issues: Minor issues: As indicated by ID Nits, presumably the reference to RFC 4366 in section 3.1 should be replaced by a reference to RFC 5246. Nits/editorial comments: I presume that the authors wish to thank Alfred Hoenes for his suggestions, rather than for their suggestions? (Given Alfred's history of thorough reviews, acknowledging him with a grammatical error just seems wrong.) Thank you for the comments. I've uploaded a -06 version to fix those issues. regards, Nikos ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-rfc5081bis-05
Thank you Nikos. -06 resolves all of my (admittedly minor) concerns. Yours, Joel Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: On 08/20/2010 06:01 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. [...] Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC Major issues: Minor issues: As indicated by ID Nits, presumably the reference to RFC 4366 in section 3.1 should be replaced by a reference to RFC 5246. Nits/editorial comments: I presume that the authors wish to thank Alfred Hoenes for his suggestions, rather than for their suggestions? (Given Alfred's history of thorough reviews, acknowledging him with a grammatical error just seems wrong.) Thank you for the comments. I've uploaded a -06 version to fix those issues. regards, Nikos ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dna-simple-16.txt (plus apologies)
Thank you for your review, Brian! Jari Brian E Carpenter kirjoitti: I'm sorry... it took me half an hour to debug why Thunderbird was using a video MIME type for plain text. Finally the attachment should be correct. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
