[Gen-art] Assignments for Oct. 7th, 2010 Telechat

2010-10-01 Thread Mary Barnes 
Hi all,

Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the Oct. 7th, 2010 telechat:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-101007.html

With the updated spreadsheets:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

For your convenience, the review boilerplate template is included below.

Note that reviews should ideally be posted to the gen-art mailing list
by COB on Tuesday:
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/

Mary.

---

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IESG Telechat date: 07 Oct 2010

Summary:

Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 1 Oct 2010

2010-10-01 Thread Mary Barnes 
Hi all,

Here's the link to the new LC assignments for last week:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-101001-lc.html

The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

The standard template is included below.

Thanks,
Mary.
---

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te-06.txt

2010-10-01 Thread david.black 
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Summary:
This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be 
fixed before publication.

After the -06 version was posted, IESG discussion resulted in a couple of RFC 
Editor notes that address the open issues from the Gen-ART review of -05.

The following 3 IANA-related nits still need attention:

- In Section 4.1, remove the note to IANA after 2) and instead insert this 
instruction into Section 7.

- In Figure 4, the type is TBA.  Add an instruction to Section 7 for IANA to 
fill this in after it is
allocated.
 
- In the fourth bullet in Section 7, please state that the registry is created 
by the MLN-EXT draft if
that is the case.

It looks like IANA has figured out at least the third of these, but follow-up 
w/IANA is already needed because one of the RFC Editor Notes removes an IANA 
Action.  That follow-up should be used to confirm that the planned IANA Actions 
match what was intended.

The entire Gen-ART review of the -05 version is below.

Thanks,
--David


> -Original Message-
> From: Black, David
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:01 PM
> To: 'gen-art@ietf.org'; donald.fe...@alcatel-lucent.com; 
> hs...@force10networks.com;
> nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com; attila.tak...@ericsson.com
> Cc: Black, David; Lou Berger; Deborah Brungard; Adrian Farrel; Daniel King; 
> 'cc...@ietf.org'
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te-05.txt
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.
> 
> Summary:
> This draft is on the right track, but has open issues, described in the 
> review.
> 
> This draft describes the use of a GMPLS control plane to configure explicit 
> forwarding in Ethernet
> bridges for PBB-TE (Provider Backbone Bridge Traffic Engineering).
> 
> In general, the draft is in good shape; the two open issues are in Section 
> 5.1.2 and are minor:
> - Is the "has to allocate a VID" statement in Section 5.1.2 correct when 
> shared forwarding
>   is in use as described in Section 3.1 ?
> - The error value: MPLS Label allocation failure (9) appears to be 
> inconsistent with the
>   second bullet in Section 7 that requests IANA to allocate a new error 
> value: "PBB-TE
>   Ethernet Label VID allocation failure" (suggested value: 35?)  for this 
> case.
> 
> Nits:
> 
> In Section 2, what are the I and B components of an IB-BEB?  Interface and 
> Bridge?
> 
> In Figure 1, the VIP acronym is not in Section 2's list of acronyms.
> 
> In Section 4.1, remove the note to IANA after 2) and instead insert this 
> instruction into Section 7.
> 
> In Figure 4, the type is TBA.  Add an instruction to Section 7 for IANA to 
> fill this in after it is
> allocated.
> 
> In the fourth bullet in Section 7, please state that the registry is created 
> by the MLN-EXT draft if
> that is the case.
> 
> idnits 2.12.04 ran clean.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
> David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> david.bl...@emc.com    Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> 
> 

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art