[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review: draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch-07.txt
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch-07.txt Reviewer: Mary Barnes Review Date: 07 April 2011 IETF LC End Date: 28 March 2011 Summary: Ready with minor issues. Minor issues: - Introduction, 3rd paragraph notes that this document only deals with the ASM model, yet the 2nd paragraph in section 2 notes that the address assignment inside the node for SSM is discussed. I would suggest to reword the 3rd paragraph in section 1 and it seems that the 2nd paragraph is section 2 is redundant. - Section 7, 1st paragraph notes that the security analysis of the mentioned protocols is out of scope of this memo. However, the next paragraph notes that the dynamic assignment protocol are inherently vulnerable…. Thus, I would suggest changing the first paragraph to something like the following (and removing 2nd): This memo only describes the approaches to allocating and assigning multicast addresses for existing protocols and thus adds no additional security considerations beyond those specified for the referenced protocols. Additional security analysis of these protocols is outside the scope of this document. Although, it should be noted the dynamic assignment protocols are inherently vulnerable to resource exhaustion attacks as discussed in [RFC2730]. In addition, if the intention was to highlight a security issue that should be resolved, then perhaps adding another bullet to section 4.3 would be appropriate. Obviously, especially the dynamic assignment protocols are inherently vulnerable to resource exhaustion attacks, as discussed e.g., in [RFC2730]. Nits/editorial comments: - Section 2, as described below might be better worded as as described in subsequent sections, although I think it would make the document more readable to summarize the mechanisms in a bulleted list and add section references. - Section 3 - same comment as for section 2. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2011-04-07
Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/reviewers-110407-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html The standard template is included below. Thanks, Jean --- I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: Reviewer: Review Date: IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptorq-0
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. This is a re-review for telechat purposes. Document: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptorq-05 RaptorQ Forward Error Correction Scheme for Object Delivery Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 7-April-2011 IETF LC End Date: 14-April-2011 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. The changes to the document improve it, address some of the issues I raised, and are such that it is still ready for publication. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-avtcore-ports-for-ucast-mcast-rtp-01
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. This is a re-review for telechat. Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-ports-for-ucast-mcast-rtp-01 Port Mapping Between Unicast and Multicast RTP Sessions Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 7-April-2011 IETF LC End Date: 08-Mar-2011 IESG Telechat date: 14-April-2011 Summary: This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Note: While the protocol structure is very different from that used in many other contexts, it seems to have been chosen deliberately, and it works. Good enough. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
