Re: [Gen-art] [Rats] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

[Ines Robles]

Thank you Laurence,  + 1 as well, both of the suggested sentences are Ok
for me.

Have a nice weekend,

Ines.

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:38 PM Smith, Ned  wrote:

> +1 to either of LL's suggestions.
>
> On 8/11/23, 11:28 AM, "lgl securitytheory.com"  > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 10, 2023, at 1:51 PM, Ines Robles  40googlemail@dmarc.ietf.org >
> wrote:
> >
> > Many thanks Laurence for addressing my comments and for the providing
> clarifications
> >
> > I understand the provided motive to not imply the trust to be static.
> Perhaps, one way to convey the potentially varying degree of trust
> dependant on context can be achieved by replacing "wishes" (which is
> usually attributed to human sentiments) and as well as changing "how much"
> (which represents in my understanding a quantity value):
> >
> > Thus, instead of:
> > "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to
> determine how much it wishes to trust the entity."
> > how about?:
> > "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to
> determine the applicable trust in the entity."
>
>
> It’s kind of an important sentence. Appreciate the thoughtful wordsmithing
> here. :-)
>
>
> I like this:
> "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to
> determine the type and degree of trust placed in the entity”
>
>
> This is OK too:
> "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to
> determine the type and degree of trust attributed to the entity”
>
>
> LL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Rats] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

[Smith, Ned]

+1 to either of LL's suggestions.

On 8/11/23, 11:28 AM, "lgl securitytheory.com" mailto:l...@securitytheory.com>> wrote:




> On Aug 10, 2023, at 1:51 PM, Ines Robles 
>  > wrote:
> 
> Many thanks Laurence for addressing my comments and for the providing 
> clarifications
> 
> I understand the provided motive to not imply the trust to be static. 
> Perhaps, one way to convey the potentially varying degree of trust dependant 
> on context can be achieved by replacing "wishes" (which is usually attributed 
> to human sentiments) and as well as changing "how much" (which represents in 
> my understanding a quantity value):
> 
> Thus, instead of:
> "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine 
> how much it wishes to trust the entity."
> how about?:
> "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine 
> the applicable trust in the entity."


It’s kind of an important sentence. Appreciate the thoughtful wordsmithing 
here. :-)


I like this:
"This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine the 
type and degree of trust placed in the entity”


This is OK too:
"This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine the 
type and degree of trust attributed to the entity”


LL







___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Rats] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

[lgl securitytheory . com]

> On Aug 10, 2023, at 1:51 PM, Ines Robles 
>  wrote:
> 
> Many thanks Laurence for addressing my comments and for the providing 
> clarifications
> 
> I understand the provided motive to not imply the trust to be static. 
> Perhaps, one way to convey the potentially varying degree of trust dependant 
> on context can be achieved by replacing "wishes" (which is usually attributed 
> to human sentiments) and as well as changing "how much" (which represents in 
> my understanding a quantity value):
> 
> Thus, instead of:
> "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine 
> how much it wishes to trust the entity."
> how about?:
> "This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine 
> the applicable trust in the entity."

It’s kind of an important sentence. Appreciate the thoughtful wordsmithing 
here. :-)

I like this:
"This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine 
the type and degree of trust placed in the entity”

This is OK too:
"This claims set is used by a relying party, server or service to determine 
the type and degree of trust attributed to the entity”

LL


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art