I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=mb_ePFTrh4SrJtyhoUSSxm3VeVCCfkSyGSgcyusg8UA&s=DcFaQTeDfxbYZdHOC8LSldAdZ87N4zFiXuKx99Z2seU&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=mb_ePFTrh4SrJtyhoUSSxm3VeVCCfkSyGSgcyusg8UA&s=DcFaQTeDfxbYZdHOC8LSldAdZ87N4zFiXuKx99Z2seU&e=%20> >. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-16 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 5/6/15 IETF LC End Date: 5/7/15 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready with minor comments. I liked the operational considerations section and the security consideration section - very useful in putting this work in the context of other similar contributions. Major issues: None. Minor issues: As the document uses heavily the term 'downgrade' (downgrade attack, downgrade-resistant) it would be nice to either explain or provide a reference for what it means in the context of this work. Nits/editorial comments: The last paragraph in section 2.2.1, page 15 has a comment marked twice by --. This may be an editorial left-over to be corrected.
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art