Re: [Gen-art] IESG Evaluation review of draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Ralph, all: many thanks for the review & changes!

Jari

On 02 Nov 2016, at 03:06, Ralph Droms  wrote:

> (Correcting revision number of reviewed document)
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13.
> 
> The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents
> being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for
> direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new
> version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at 
> <​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13
> Reviewer: Ralph Droms
> Review Date: 2016-11-01
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-06
> IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: None
> Thanks to the authors for addressing my editorial comments from my earlier 
> review.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art


[Gen-art] IESG Evaluation review of draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13

2016-11-01 Thread Ralph Droms
(Correcting revision number of reviewed document)

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13.

The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents
being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for
direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new
version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at 
<​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13
Reviewer: Ralph Droms
Review Date: 2016-11-01
IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-06
IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: None
Thanks to the authors for addressing my editorial comments from my earlier 
review.



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art