Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
Darn - and all this time as a Canadian I assumed we spelled it the same way as Americans :) I'll fix it up. PatC -Original Message- From: Scott Brim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 6:31 AM To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gen-art@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt On 7/11/08 9:13 PM, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) allegedly wrote: - in TOC and section 6: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments PRC I think perhaps your version is the queen's english, while mine is the one accepted in the US :( It's the other way around, unfortunately. The USA mostly loses the e. IMHO the usage doesn't matter as long as it's consistent, otherwise we could gleefully kill all those occurrences of whilst. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
On 7/14/08 12:18 PM, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) allegedly wrote: Darn - and all this time as a Canadian I assumed we spelled it the same way as Americans :) I'll fix it up. PatC A Canadian once told me that in school they told him he could spell any way he liked as long as he was consistent, and that's why he can't spell. Then again he was from PEI. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
In your previous mail you wrote: - in TOC and section 6: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments PRC I think perhaps your version is the queen's english, while mine is the one accepted in the US :( = there is no (not yet?) gen-art review FAQ but if the two spelling exist the RFC Editor loudly insists to use the one without the 'e'... Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: you should have noted Ralph Droms' comment about v4/v6 option naming. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
On 7/11/08 9:13 PM, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) allegedly wrote: - in TOC and section 6: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments PRC I think perhaps your version is the queen's english, while mine is the one accepted in the US :( It's the other way around, unfortunately. The USA mostly loses the e. IMHO the usage doesn't matter as long as it's consistent, otherwise we could gleefully kill all those occurrences of whilst. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2008-07-10 IETF LC End Date: 2008-07-14 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready with nits Comments: I have two general questions and the usual editioral things (here editorial means they can be handled by the RFC Editor): - the first general question is about references to DHCP: * the whole document, including the Abstract, assumes the reader already knows what is DHCP. I have no concern about this but perhaps I should? I propose to keep this point closed until someone else raises it (so it could enter into the any other LC comments) * 1.2 (Terminology) is only about CAPWAP, IMHO even you don't abuse of DHCP specific terms it is a good place to add DHCP references (the three at the beginning of the Security Considerations for instance). - the second question is about the use (or abuse) of 2119 keywords at unusual places, namely in the Introduction (i.e., before the 2119 reference) and in the IANA Considerations. But it is only a question of usage/style... - in TOC and section 6: Acknowledgements - Acknowledgments Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
