I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 17 April 2007 IESG Telechat date: 10 May 2007? Summary: Ready Comments: some details which should be handled by the RFC editor: - 2 page 4: expand PSTN abbrev at its first use. - I don't really like the last sentence of REQ 1/Page 4 - 3 page 5: UA is expanded only at its second use (it should be once and at the first time). - 4 page 6: ie., -> i.e., - 5.2.1.2 page 12: possiblity - 5.2.2 page 14: unidectional - 5.4 page 23: expand CPL? - 6.1 page 24: twice the paragraph "If the CN and the local..." - 6.1 page 4 (next paragraph): which need -> which needs? Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: I believe this is more readdressing than mobility but as SIP is routed and the Abstract is very clear about the intended meaning of the word mobility IMHO there is no need to change this. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
