[Gendergap] Looking for documentation regarding wiki uses by ....

2011-03-15 Thread Florence Devouard
Hi guys

I apology if the issue has already been covered (I do not follow the 
list with 100% attention).
I am looking for *any* study, stats, reports, which would have been made 
in the past or is ongoing regarding the use of Wikimedia projects and/or 
the use of Wiki software generally, by specific groups of people such as:
* women
* poorly educated people
* people with mental disabilities
* people with physical disabilities
* people living in poor suburbs in so-called rich countries
* people deeply socially disconnected

In particular with regards to how Wikimedia projects or the use of wiki 
software/concept might have improved their situation (better integration 
in society for example).

Any little bit might help. Do not hesitate to contact me privately if it 
is not a feedback directly in the scope of this list.

Thanks in advance

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Proposal: Forking gendergap: Main list for women and transgender, sublist for male supporters

2011-03-15 Thread Fred Bauder


 I don't edit Wikipedia because I've never taken the time to learn the
 system
 and I'm afraid I'll screw up. I assume it would feel like making a big
 mistake in a newspaper and having the whole neighborhood scoff, and I
 think
 that becomes a part of my Wikipedia profile forever and ever. I'd like to
 find a YouTube video to walk me through basic involvement. If it's that
 cute
 guy from Portland who is now a Wikipedia community manager presenting it,
 well all the better. I could also be encouraged to edit if the community
 had
 an offline component that included meeting for microbrews.

 Thanks,
 Carissa

One of the original meanings of Wikipedia:Ignore all rules addressed
that. It's current formulation is laconic and opaque to anyone but an
insider. The original formulation was If rules make you nervous and
depressed, and not desirous of participating in the Wiki, then ignore
them and go about your business.

I remember getting off to a pretty rough start.

As to beer, I think you need to live in London for that.

Fred


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


[Gendergap] Gender Gap discussion at Recent Changes Camp 2011

2011-03-15 Thread Nicole Willson
Hello,

As one of the organizers/attendees for Recent Changes Camp Boston 2011, I
just wanted to share what happened during the Gender Gap session through
pictures taken by wikiHow admin ttrimm. This was the most popular session,
followed by a session about Wiki Politics:

Gender Gap session
attendeeshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/ttrimm/5527798069/in/set-72157626144598891/#/photos/ttrimm/5527798069/in/set-72157626144598891/lightbox/.
(I am the woman in purple next to the easel on the right who is scratching
her head.)

Noteshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/ttrimm/5527798201/in/set-72157626144598891/.
- If you have any questions about the notes, please feel free to ask me
either here or off-list.

40% of the conference attendees were female. Most of these women were
wikiHow admis, but also Anne Goldenberg (the facilitator and one of the
co-organizers), a woman who created websites using Tiki as well as a woman
who was just getting started editing Appropedia.

I think the conclusion that we came to was that making it easier for people
to become part of the community (for example, being less argumentative with
newbies), would help to lower the barriers to entry and get more people
involved. Basically, anything that would help the newbies like clearer
documentation and being super gentle with people who are editing wikis for
the first time. While newbie friendliness, may not be specific to women, we
felt that it would help get more new editors on Wikipedia and the other WMF
projects, including more women.
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Proposal: Forking gendergap: Main list for women and transgender, sublist for male supporters

2011-03-15 Thread Ryan Kaldari
On 3/15/11 9:34 AM, Nicole Willson wrote:
 Lastly, I had a question about Fred's statement about rules. If 
 following rules isn't that important in the beginning, how come I have 
 only gotten feedback once about what I've done wrong with date 
 formatting and never gotten a message about what I've done right on 
 Wikipedia? I've made at least 150 edits, so one of them must have been 
 good, right? Instead I get a message about date formatting (which 
 someone else could probably fix easily) and told to look at the MoS 
 (which assumes that I know that it stands for Manual of Style). It 
 seems to me that there may be a disconnect here.

Yes, there is definitely a disconnect. I proposed adding some positive 
user feedback templates to the widely-used Twinkle gadget a while back, 
but was shot down due to concerns that it would be abused(?!). So 
instead, I created a new WikiLove user script and have proposed it as 
a new gadget. This script makes it just as easy to add barnstars, 
cookies, kittens, cupcakes, etc. to user talk pages as it is to add 
warning templates via Twinkle. The response to my proposal was baffling: 
doesn't seem to have any practical purpose, I don't think most people 
would be pleased to see an increase in barnstar-giving, the current 
level of barnstar-giving is sufficient. Apparently the community puts 
little to no values in positive user feedback. This is probably a 
symptom of the Eternal September effect mentioned by Sue in the March 
Update. I think the culture can change, but it's going to take a 
sustained and concerted effort.

Kaldari

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Proposal: Forking gendergap: Main list for women and transgender, sublist for male supporters

2011-03-15 Thread Fred Bauder
 On 3/15/11 9:34 AM, Nicole Willson wrote:
 Lastly, I had a question about Fred's statement about rules. If
 following rules isn't that important in the beginning, how come I have
 only gotten feedback once about what I've done wrong with date
 formatting and never gotten a message about what I've done right on
 Wikipedia? I've made at least 150 edits, so one of them must have been
 good, right? Instead I get a message about date formatting (which
 someone else could probably fix easily) and told to look at the MoS
 (which assumes that I know that it stands for Manual of Style). It
 seems to me that there may be a disconnect here.

 Yes, there is definitely a disconnect. I proposed adding some positive
 user feedback templates to the widely-used Twinkle gadget a while back,
 but was shot down due to concerns that it would be abused(?!). So
 instead, I created a new WikiLove user script and have proposed it as
 a new gadget. This script makes it just as easy to add barnstars,
 cookies, kittens, cupcakes, etc. to user talk pages as it is to add
 warning templates via Twinkle. The response to my proposal was baffling:
 doesn't seem to have any practical purpose, I don't think most people
 would be pleased to see an increase in barnstar-giving, the current
 level of barnstar-giving is sufficient. Apparently the community puts
 little to no values in positive user feedback. This is probably a
 symptom of the Eternal September effect mentioned by Sue in the March
 Update. I think the culture can change, but it's going to take a
 sustained and concerted effort.

 Kaldari

Obviously a gendered response...

Perhaps a backslapping or high-fiving bot...

Fred


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] How to use Wiki videos

2011-03-15 Thread Pharos
Hi Carissa et al,

This is the pan-wiki meetup in Portland, you may well already be
familiar with this one:

http://pdx.wiki.org/Welcome_to_Portland_WikiWednesday!

For Mexico City, I suggest you get in touch with the group working to
form the Wikimedia Mexico chapter:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_México

Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Lennart Guldbrandsson
l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Thanks for the ideas.

 About wikimeetups: everybody else is waiting for you to announce one. Once
 you do, they will come.

 About the culture: I think Steven Walling's presentation is one of the most
 succinct:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEkF5o6KPNI

 Good luck with the editing.

 Best wishes,

 Lennart

 Lennart Guldbrandsson,
 Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation / Wikimedia Foudation-stipendiat
 Chair of Wikimedia Sverige / ordförande för Wikimedia Sverige
 http://wikimedia.se
 Tfn: 031 - 12 50 48 Mobil: 070 - 207 80 05 Epost:
 l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com Användarsida:
 http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Hannibal Blogg:
 http://mrchapel.wordpress.com/



 
 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:04:15 -0600
 From: carissawodeho...@gmail.com
 To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: Re: [Gendergap] How to use Wiki videos

 Hi,
 Yep I do find both of those videos too basic
 (http://www.howcast.com/videos/317521-How-To-Edit-a-Wikipedia-Article and
 http://www.commoncraft.com/wikipedia-video). I get the nuts and bolts of how
 to click around, I know basic html when I see it, and I remember neutral
 tone and proper citations from college and time in publishing (but gotta
 love a video on the internet that explains that you need an internet
 connection). The Howcast referenced the Wiki:Cite page, which I then find
 confusing because I don't get when to use each citation method.

 A Strunk  White version of the rules is what I need! There's so many women
 in publishing, that could be a good group to target for women on Wiki
 involvement, as someone said before. I just need to know how wiki editing is
 similar and different from AP Style, for example.

 I would also be interested in a video that explains the community, which is
 both one of the primary barriers and primary motivations I have for
 participating. I didn't know about barnstars and awards, for example. Then I
 eventually found this Editor Assistance page
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance) which looks like
 something handy-- I didn't know there was a place to ask for help. Then,
 what are user talk, user boxes, who gives awards, who are some key figures
 (Jimbo, etc), what is the user/editor/moderator relationship, and what are
 some things that can happen once I start editing and interacting. That's
 what a video would be handy for. It all feels like trying to get into Lost
 in the last season-- all these time tunnels and smoke monsters that I
 couldn't trace to their original form if I tried.

 Sadly, I see no meet ups in Portland or Mexico City, yet...



 Thanks,
 Carissa


 ___ Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] How to use Wiki videos

2011-03-15 Thread Ryan Kaldari
A video incorporating the new RefToolbar (the thing that appears when 
you click Cite in the editor) would be helpful in this regard. 
Citation templates and citation formatting are definitely one of the 
biggest barriers to truly integrating newbies into Wikipedia editing 
(i.e. getting beyond doing spelling corrections). I think that people 
would be a lot less intimidated if they knew they could just paste in an 
ISBN number and click a button and the citation is automatically created 
for them. (I remember my own amazement at learning this.)


Ryan Kaldari

On 3/15/11 4:04 PM, Carissa Wodehouse wrote:

Hi,
Yep I do find both of those videos too basic 
(http://www.howcast.com/videos/317521-How-To-Edit-a-Wikipedia-Article 
and http://www.commoncraft.com/wikipedia-video). I get the nuts and 
bolts of how to click around, I know basic html when I see it, and I 
remember neutral tone and proper citations from college and time in 
publishing (but gotta love a video on the internet that explains that 
you need an internet connection). The Howcast referenced the Wiki:Cite 
page, which I then find confusing because I don't get when to use each 
citation method.


A Strunk  White version of the rules is what I need! There's so many 
women in publishing, that could be a good group to target for women on 
Wiki involvement, as someone said before. I just need to know how wiki 
editing is similar and different from AP Style, for example.


I would also be interested in a video that explains the community, 
which is both one of the primary barriers and primary motivations I 
have for participating. I didn't know about barnstars and awards, for 
example. Then I eventually found this Editor Assistance page 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance) which looks 
like something handy-- I didn't know there was a place to ask for 
help. Then, what are user talk, user boxes, who gives awards, who are 
some key figures (Jimbo, etc), what is the user/editor/moderator 
relationship, and what are some things that can happen once I start 
editing and interacting. That's what a video would be handy for. It 
all feels like trying to get into Lost in the last season-- all these 
time tunnels and smoke monsters that I couldn't trace to their 
original form if I tried.


Sadly, I see no meet ups in Portland or Mexico City, yet...

Thanks,
Carissa


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap