Re: [Gendergap] Article Cumshot in English and German Wikipedia

2012-04-29 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
  No one here has commented on the fact that the German Wikipedia article
 uses
  a special, local version of one of Seedfeeder's images. The German
 version
  is more amateurish, and a little more nasty. Compare:
 
  http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Wiki-facial_cumshot.png
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wiki-cumshot.png

 I noticed that.

 However, the German article focuses on the use in pornography, and the
 nastier image is more appropriate in that setting.



Personally, I thought the extra bit of nastiness unnecessary (especially
combined with the lack of drawing expertise in execution).



 The English article about [[Cum shot]] drifts into areas that are more
 sexuality than pornography, often reproducing content which is on
 [[Facial (sex act)]].  German Wikipedia doesnt appear to have an
 article about the sexual act.



A cumshot is not a sexual act, but a photographic recording of a sexual act
(shot refers to the photography, not the ejaculation).

Andreas
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Article Cumshot in English and German Wikipedia

2012-04-29 Thread Michelle Gallaway
This is a great idea.  We'll see if the bleating that the image is
educational is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC
carolmoor...@verizon.netwrote:

  On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:

 I could have a go again, Carol.  :)

  Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.

  Andreas

  So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant
 re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male on
 male.  Go for it!

 As for female ejaculation since ejaculation is putting out sperm, I
 don't think women do it.

 Women obviously -- geez, I don't what you call it besides get wet. And
 maybe orgasms squeeze some of it out an orifice. But I don't think that's
 ejaculation.  But I do now know I don't what the technical terms are or if
 there are any!!

 CM


 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Article Cumshot in English and German Wikipedia

2012-04-29 Thread Béria Lima
As far as I remember the nake-hub of commons (As i call it) has no
problem at all with homosexuality. Who has the problem is the other side of
commons, the puritans (several here in that list) who cant see a naked
picture - wherever is there is a man, a woman, a hetero sex relation, a gay
or lesbian one.

PS.: I just don't do the draw myself because I don't have the skills to do
it.
_
*Béria Lima*

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
construir esse sonho. http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos*


On 29 April 2012 21:19, Michelle Gallaway mgalla...@gmail.com wrote:

 This is a great idea.  We'll see if the bleating that the image is
 educational is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)

 On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.net
  wrote:

  On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:

 I could have a go again, Carol.  :)

  Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.

  Andreas

  So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant
 re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male on
 male.  Go for it!

 As for female ejaculation since ejaculation is putting out sperm, I
 don't think women do it.

 Women obviously -- geez, I don't what you call it besides get wet. And
 maybe orgasms squeeze some of it out an orifice. But I don't think that's
 ejaculation.  But I do now know I don't what the technical terms are or if
 there are any!!

 CM


 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap