Re: [Gendergap] Article "Cumshot" in English and German Wikipedia

[Béria Lima]

As far as I remember the "nake-hub" of commons (As i call it) has no
problem at all with homosexuality. Who has the problem is the other side of
commons, the "puritans" (several here in that list) who cant see a naked
picture - wherever is there is a man, a woman, a hetero sex relation, a gay
or lesbian one.

PS.: I just don't do the draw myself because I don't have the skills to do
it.
_
*Béria Lima*

*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
construir esse sonho. *


On 29 April 2012 21:19, Michelle Gallaway  wrote:

> This is a great idea.  We'll see if the bleating that the image is
> "educational" is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC  > wrote:
>
>>  On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>>
>> I could have a go again, Carol.  >:)
>>
>>  Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
>>
>>  Andreas
>>
>>  So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant
>> re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male on
>> male.  Go for it!
>>
>> As for female "ejaculation" since ejaculation is putting out sperm, I
>> don't think women do it.
>>
>> Women obviously -- geez, I don't what you call it besides "get wet." And
>> maybe orgasms squeeze some of it out an orifice. But I don't think that's
>> ejaculation.  But I do now know I don't what the technical terms are or if
>> there are any!!
>>
>> CM
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Article "Cumshot" in English and German Wikipedia

[Michelle Gallaway]

This is a great idea.  We'll see if the bleating that the image is
"educational" is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC
wrote:

>  On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>
> I could have a go again, Carol.  >:)
>
>  Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
>
>  Andreas
>
>  So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant
> re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male on
> male.  Go for it!
>
> As for female "ejaculation" since ejaculation is putting out sperm, I
> don't think women do it.
>
> Women obviously -- geez, I don't what you call it besides "get wet." And
> maybe orgasms squeeze some of it out an orifice. But I don't think that's
> ejaculation.  But I do now know I don't what the technical terms are or if
> there are any!!
>
> CM
>
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Article "Cumshot" in English and German Wikipedia

[Andreas Kolbe]

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Vandenberg  wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe  wrote:
> > No one here has commented on the fact that the German Wikipedia article
> uses
> > a special, local version of one of Seedfeeder's images. The German
> version
> > is more amateurish, and a little more nasty. Compare:
> >
> > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Wiki-facial_cumshot.png
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wiki-cumshot.png
>
> I noticed that.
>
> However, the German article focuses on the use in pornography, and the
> nastier image is more appropriate in that setting.
>


Personally, I thought the extra bit of nastiness unnecessary (especially
combined with the lack of drawing expertise in execution).



> The English article about [[Cum shot]] drifts into areas that are more
> sexuality than pornography, often reproducing content which is on
> [[Facial (sex act)]].  German Wikipedia doesnt appear to have an
> article about the sexual act.



A cumshot is not a sexual act, but a photographic recording of a sexual act
("shot" refers to the photography, not the ejaculation).

Andreas
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap