[Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread Maia Weinstock
Hi all,

There have been numerous discussions among folks in the space exploration
community that use of the word manned and unmanned in Wikipedia is
outdated and gender-biased. Unfortunately, going in and fixing all of these
by hand would be rather labor-intensive...

Someone recently created a browser plugin that replaces manned with
crewed. (See https://twitter.com/mcnees/status/570409472818061312) It
would be such an awesome thing if a bot existed that updated these
instances for real on English Wikipedia. Anyone have ideas for making this
happen, perhaps just limiting it to space exploration? I do see some issues
with it being done wholesale for the whole site, as certain terms might
contain terminology that would create confusion if changed automatically.
(For instance, unmanned aerial vehicles, for better or for worse, is a
known term that I wouldn't advocate changing at this time.)

Anyway, just thinking out loud...

Maia (user:Girona7)
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread J Hayes
you can also do a bot request here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:09 PM, JJ Marr jjm...@gmail.com wrote:

 You should ask down at the village pump, then if the response is
 favorable, start a BRFA.
 On Feb 24, 2015 10:04 PM, Maia Weinstock mai...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 There have been numerous discussions among folks in the space exploration
 community that use of the word manned and unmanned in Wikipedia is
 outdated and gender-biased. Unfortunately, going in and fixing all of these
 by hand would be rather labor-intensive...

 Someone recently created a browser plugin that replaces manned with
 crewed. (See https://twitter.com/mcnees/status/570409472818061312) It
 would be such an awesome thing if a bot existed that updated these
 instances for real on English Wikipedia. Anyone have ideas for making this
 happen, perhaps just limiting it to space exploration? I do see some issues
 with it being done wholesale for the whole site, as certain terms might
 contain terminology that would create confusion if changed automatically.
 (For instance, unmanned aerial vehicles, for better or for worse, is a
 known term that I wouldn't advocate changing at this time.)

 Anyway, just thinking out loud...

 Maia (user:Girona7)



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
 visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
 visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread Kerry Raymond
The mechanics of doing this aren't such a big deal. AutoWikiBrowser is
probably the best way to do it as you can eyeball each change before it
happens just to make you that you haven't done something inappropriate (like
the unmanned vehicle example). It's a little tedious (to eyeball each one)
but not labour-intensive really (click SAVE or SKIP).

 

But I think first it needs to be agreed within that community that they want
this change. Otherwise you might be regarded as being Bold With A Bulldozer
if you use any automated or semi-automated tool.

 

Kerry

 

 

  _  

From: gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Maia Weinstock
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2015 1:04 PM
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

 

Hi all,

There have been numerous discussions among folks in the space exploration
community that use of the word manned and unmanned in Wikipedia is
outdated and gender-biased. Unfortunately, going in and fixing all of these
by hand would be rather labor-intensive...

Someone recently created a browser plugin that replaces manned with
crewed. (See https://twitter.com/mcnees/status/570409472818061312) It
would be such an awesome thing if a bot existed that updated these instances
for real on English Wikipedia. Anyone have ideas for making this happen,
perhaps just limiting it to space exploration? I do see some issues with it
being done wholesale for the whole site, as certain terms might contain
terminology that would create confusion if changed automatically. (For
instance, unmanned aerial vehicles, for better or for worse, is a known
term that I wouldn't advocate changing at this time.) 

Anyway, just thinking out loud...

Maia (user:Girona7)



___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

2015-02-24 Thread Kerry Raymond
I just had a look.

 

The category Space exploration's complete closure is around 8000 articles. I
ran a quick speed check with AutoWikiBrowser. It can skip an article that
doesn't contain manned in about 1 second (no human action required) and it
takes however long you take to make the decision to make the change on
articles that do contain manned (one click on either SKIP or SAVE). On
that basis, it can skip all the articles in about 2 hours 15 minutes (if no
human action required). Human action requires a chance at the displayed diff
and then click SKIP/SAVE. I generally have that sort of task running in a
background window and just flick over and see how it's going from time to
time. Takes longer in total elapsed time but less boring that way, and
overall the job gets done in far less time than trying to get other people
to write and run a bot, noting the care that has to be taken to foresee
things like unmanned vehicle that should not be changed if operating a
totally automated bot.

 

Kerry

 

 

  _  

From: Kerry Raymond [mailto:kerry.raym...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2015 2:46 PM
To: 'Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase
theparticipation of women within Wikimedia projects.'
Subject: RE: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

 

The mechanics of doing this aren't such a big deal. AutoWikiBrowser is
probably the best way to do it as you can eyeball each change before it
happens just to make you that you haven't done something inappropriate (like
the unmanned vehicle example). It's a little tedious (to eyeball each one)
but not labour-intensive really (click SAVE or SKIP).

 

But I think first it needs to be agreed within that community that they want
this change. Otherwise you might be regarded as being Bold With A Bulldozer
if you use any automated or semi-automated tool.

 

Kerry

 

 

  _  

From: gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Maia Weinstock
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2015 1:04 PM
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Gendergap] Random musings about a bot

 

Hi all,

There have been numerous discussions among folks in the space exploration
community that use of the word manned and unmanned in Wikipedia is
outdated and gender-biased. Unfortunately, going in and fixing all of these
by hand would be rather labor-intensive...

Someone recently created a browser plugin that replaces manned with
crewed. (See https://twitter.com/mcnees/status/570409472818061312) It
would be such an awesome thing if a bot existed that updated these instances
for real on English Wikipedia. Anyone have ideas for making this happen,
perhaps just limiting it to space exploration? I do see some issues with it
being done wholesale for the whole site, as certain terms might contain
terminology that would create confusion if changed automatically. (For
instance, unmanned aerial vehicles, for better or for worse, is a known
term that I wouldn't advocate changing at this time.) 

Anyway, just thinking out loud...

Maia (user:Girona7)

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap