Re: [Gendergap] Statistics about gender gap

2012-02-02 Thread Nina Wikipedia
Thanks Sarah!

 Nina
Sendt fra min iPhone

Den 2. feb. 2012 kl. 22:15 skrev Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com:

 On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
 By the way, you can't invite 1000 women that a day after leave because they
 don't understand how to edit (usability) or other reason. First, you have to
 understand why women leave. When you solves that, every woman that arrives,
 will continue editing forever. You won't need to invite them.
 
 I agree with this point, and I wonder whether we're approaching
 outreach from the wrong perspective. We are asking what is good for
 Wikipedia? when we should be asking what is good for the women we
 want to sign up? If we create an environment in which they can
 thrive, then they'll come and they'll stay, and we won't have to keep
 begging them to join us.
 
 But we have serious problems in the community. I've been on wikibreak
 for a few months, during which time I barely looked at Wikipedia (the
 English Wikipedia). When I did start to look again, I saw a community
 that is really fracturing. Lots of serious incivility, old grudges
 being played out in various places, and what one editor called regular
 Leninist purges. None of this is new, but it's getting worse. Plus,
 too many rules too rigidly enforced, too many confusing templates, and
 a push for quality that often boils down to endless nitpicking. And
 the most off-putting thing of all -- you spend hours, days or weeks on
 a piece of work only to see someone come along and casually destroy
 it.
 
 It is causing established editors to leave or reduce their
 involvement, including some of the few women we have. Old editors are
 leaving for the same reasons new editors are failing to arrive or
 stay. As I've argued many times, we need less outreach and more
 inreach.
 
 Can we persuade the Foundation to be more hands-on in dealing with the
 existing issues, rather than outreach?
 
 For example, I'm thinking it could offer a $15,000 prize for an essay
 that best gives us insight into the problems -- competition widely
 advertised, and open to anyone, including non-Wikimedians -- judging
 panel to be composed of Foundation employees. Perhaps a major
 publisher could be persuaded to publish the winning entry as an extra
 incentive.
 
 I'm also thinking the Foundation could hire a consultant on how to fix
 toxic communities. We are basically confronting a kind of workplace
 bullying as the essence of the problem, and there are plenty of people
 around who specialize in that. We tried to persuade the Foundation
 some years ago to hire a consultant on how to handle harassment, but
 it didn't work out. I think if we had done that, quite a few of the
 issues we see now might have turned out differently.
 
 I wonder whether the Foundation feels conflicted in this. On the one
 hand, they want to promote the idea that Wikipedia is wonderful. Come
 and join us! On the other hand, acknowledging the community's
 problems too openly puts out the opposite of that message. So we end
 up not getting the kind of all-out, top-down push for community health
 that we need.
 
 Sarah
 
 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] The gendergap on Swedish television

2011-12-14 Thread Nina Wikipedia
Looked at the program and this is very interesting.  They said that 
organisations with women are so small that they have no notability. 

Nina 
nina.wikipe...@gmail.com




Den 14. des. 2011 kl. 23:54 skrev Lennart Guldbrandsson:

 Their very new website is http://wikifem.wordpress.com/ but there is only a 
 short We are going to start type of notice there yet. We have emailed them.
 
 
 Best wishes,
 
 Lennart
 
 
 
 Lennart Guldbrandsson, 
 Tfn: 031 - 12 50 48Mobil: 070 - 207 80 05
 Epost: l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com / lenn...@wikimedia.se
 Användarsida: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Hannibal
 Blogg: http://mrchapel.wordpress.com/
 Wikimedia Sverige http://wikimedia.se
 http://www.1av3.se
 
 
 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:36:03 -0500
 From: sarah.stie...@gmail.com
 To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: Re: [Gendergap] The gendergap on Swedish television
 
 Very cool Lennart. I regret I don't know Swedish, but, this is exciting none 
 the less =) 
 
 Do you know of any on Wiki or online links to the gender gap group, or is it 
 specifically a mailing list? 
 
 Thanks for sharing this,
 
 Sarah
 
 On 12/14/11 5:33 PM, Lennart Guldbrandsson wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Recently, Swedish television had quite a long bit about the gendergap: 
 
 http://svtplay.se/v/2644848/kulturnyheterna/14_12_19_00
 
 Apparently (it caused us a little bit of a surprise), there is a Wikipedia 
 gendergap group in Sweden, and it has some cool supporters, including a 
 professor in History. They have recently started, but we intend to keep in 
 contact.
 
 
 Best wishes,
 
 Lennart
 
 
 
 Lennart Guldbrandsson, 
 Tfn: 031 - 12 50 48Mobil: 070 - 207 80 05
 Epost: l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com / lenn...@wikimedia.se
 Användarsida: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Hannibal
 Blogg: http://mrchapel.wordpress.com/
 Wikimedia Sverige http://wikimedia.se
 http://www.1av3.se
 
 
 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
 
 
 -- 
 Sarah Stierch Consulting
 --
 Historical, cultural, new media  artistic research  advising.
 http://www.sarahstierch.com
 
 ___ Gendergap mailing list 
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org 
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] WP stalking

2011-11-13 Thread Nina Wikipedia
I have got some calls about Wikipedia. I was in the board in Wikimedia Norway 
some years and president 1 year and got calls for journalists and other people 
those years. The last call I got about 1 week ago was from a woman who wanted 
to use one of my pictures in a book and ask me if it is ok. 
In Norway you only  need to have a persons name to get the number : 
http://www.gulesider.no/person/resultat/nina+Aldin+Thune  I have never told 
much about my family in the userpages. http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruker:Nina 
 , https://plus.google.com/109860657201319190669/about  only that I am 
housewife, and mother . 

Those calls have never been a problem, but I can understand that it could be, 
so as Risker/Anne says  «reconsider how much personal information you want to 
share about yourself online»  and ask someone  get stuff taken down.


Nina 
nina.wikipe...@gmail.com




Den 14. nov. 2011 kl. 00:58 skrev Risker:

 Likewise, Christine, I stand ready to assist you.  I'd suggest that yes, you 
 reconsider how much personal information you want to share about yourself 
 online; remember, Wikipedia userpages aren't just on Wikipedia, they're 
 spidered all over the web.  Once the information is out there, it's difficult 
 to put the genie back in the bottle, so to speak.  
 
 Nonetheless, if you'd like help trying to get stuff taken down, let me know.  
 
 Risker/Anne
 
 
 On 13 November 2011 18:47, Lika Tika likatikalikat...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Christine, 
 
 I'm so sorry this happened to you. Unfortunately, something similar happened 
 to me not long ago (although not related to Wikimedia). If you need any help 
 taking your personal information offline, please let me know, I'm more than 
 happy to help. 
 
 Have you let the wiki admins know, it might be a good idea.
 
 All the best to you.
 
 On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Christine Meyer christinewme...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I've heard about this kind of thing happening to other women in Wikipedia, 
 but this is the first time this has ever happened to me personally.  A few 
 weeks ago, I got a phone call from a guy who said he wanted to talk to me 
 about what it was like being the parent of children with special needs.  He 
 also said that he got my number from my church, so I told him that I was busy 
 at the moment (which I was) and that he could call me back later.
  
 Yesterday afternoon, he called me back.  I asked him where he got my number 
 and how he found out about my parenting status.  He said that he read what I 
 had written on Wikipedia about my children, and that he wanted to talk to me 
 about it because he was also developmentally disabled and had some syndrome 
 that I didn't recognize.  (It wasn't Asberger's, I don't think.)  He also 
 said that he had gotten my number from some church thing, and that they had 
 confirmed my phone number. 
  
 I told him that it was very inappropriate for him to call me, and he said, 
 Well, you said I could call you back!  I answered that I was in the middle 
 of something the first time he called me, repeated how inappropriate he was 
 being, and that I wasn't willing to speak with him over the phone.  He said, 
 You said all that on Wikipedia, and I said that I didn't have my phone 
 number there, to which he responded, But your email address is there, and I 
 said he could email me but calling me was again, inappropriate, and we hung 
 up.
  
 Like I said, it was the first time something like this has happened, even 
 after more than four years of active participation in WP.  It's somewhat 
 disconcerting to me.  When I think about it, this guy had to actively hunt 
 down my phone number.  He looked at my userpage, which has infoboxes stating 
 that I'm a parent of two children with developmental disabilities, that I 
 live in a small town in Idaho, and that I'm Catholic.  (This makes me want to 
 remove those infoboxes.)  He actually went to the trouble of calling one of 
 the the two Catholic churches in my town and confirm my number with them, 
 which they did quite honestly because I'm on a church committee and active in 
 the community.  Freaky, huh?
  
 I know that you need to tell people when something like this happens, 
 especially people in your life.  (I haven't been able to tell my husband 
 about it yet; he's been working all weekend and we're coming off of a 
 particularly stressful family situation.)  So that's what I'm doing now.  I 
 can totally see why so many women don't identify their gender on WP now.  I'd 
 also like to get some advice from the members of this list, and to see if 
 anyone else has had a similar experience and what they did about it.
 
 Thanks,
 Christine
 --
 Christine W. Meyer
 User: Figureskatingfan
 christinewme...@gmail.com
 
 
 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
 
 
 
 ___
 Gendergap