I knew it was just a matter of time before I myself would have to go 
running to wikiquette alerts (assuming other editors also fed up with 
same individual(s) in article in question don't also denounce the 
incessant personal attacks by one editor on me).

And this is an issue where two evidently pro-prosecution editors against 
a woman found innocent in a trial are playing bad cop/good cop on a 
number of editors and (till I made stink about 3RR) were doing 4-6 RR 
regularly, reverting the many various editors who presented edits, 
especially ones vs. their POV. (Including with "we're legal experts" 
excuses. After much badgering on that score I felt forced to mention 
having been a professional legal secretary for many years.)

Since I'm the only obvious female, I'm in the biggest trouble, of 
course. Mostly for being uppity, mentioning pro prosecution POV and 
thereby showing some sympathy with the (wrongly acquitted in their 
minds?) female's position.

I'll soldier on.  Can't decide if it's an issue for Feminism 
wikiproject. But definitely a combination of the behavioral and  
anti-female content issues that drive women away from wikipedia...

Carol in dc


_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to