[Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Sarah
I don't know whether this is worth bothering about, but it's the kind
of thing that concerns me. Anyone not wanting to look at genitalia
should not click on the links.

I came across [[Labiaplasty]], while looking for material on female
genital mutilation. There's an image on the page of what is supposed
to be before and after a labiaplasty.

The previous caption implied that it was the same woman, though it
doesn't look like it -- for one thing, larger versions of the images
on the Commons show one has a mole on her abdomen and the other
doesn't.

What really bothers me is the before image shows a woman within a
normal range, yet we are presenting this as something in need of
surgery. I'm concerned that young women could stumble on this and
start to doubt themselves.

The image and upload history are here --
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hypertrophy_of_Labia_Minora_before_and_after_surgery.jpg

There's no indication that these are medical images; no indication
of model release; no reliable sources indicating that the oversized
one really is regarded as such; and the images were uploaded by
occasionally used accounts.

I've twice removed the image from the article,
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Labiaplastyaction=historysubmitdiff=450858934oldid=450796332
and I've left a note on talk,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Labiaplasty#Image but it is being
restored. If anyone wants to jump in, please do. If not, no worries.
I'll completely understand if you would all prefer not to comment.

Sarah

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Arnaud HERVE
I think you are perfectly right, Sarah.

The woman on the right is also more muscular. The fact that those images 
keep being restored shows a definite intention, which makes it not an 
occasional mistake but a voluntary and persistent medical lie.

You are also right about the need of surgery. From what I hear there is 
a growing demand of surgery from teenage girls, concerning any part of 
their bodies, buttocks, femur length, whatever. It seems to me WP should 
take the contrary stance and chose images of average looking women as 
methodically as possible. Same principle as for anorexia.

Arnaud


On 17/09/2011 18:37, Sarah wrote:
 I don't know whether this is worth bothering about, but it's the kind
 of thing that concerns me. Anyone not wanting to look at genitalia
 should not click on the links.

 I came across [[Labiaplasty]], while looking for material on female
 genital mutilation. There's an image on the page of what is supposed
 to be before and after a labiaplasty.

 The previous caption implied that it was the same woman, though it
 doesn't look like it -- for one thing, larger versions of the images
 on the Commons show one has a mole on her abdomen and the other
 doesn't.

 What really bothers me is the before image shows a woman within a
 normal range, yet we are presenting this as something in need of
 surgery. I'm concerned that young women could stumble on this and
 start to doubt themselves.

 The image and upload history are here --
 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hypertrophy_of_Labia_Minora_before_and_after_surgery.jpg

 There's no indication that these are medical images; no indication
 of model release; no reliable sources indicating that the oversized
 one really is regarded as such; and the images were uploaded by
 occasionally used accounts.

 I've twice removed the image from the article,
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Labiaplastyaction=historysubmitdiff=450858934oldid=450796332
 and I've left a note on talk,
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Labiaplasty#Image but it is being
 restored. If anyone wants to jump in, please do. If not, no worries.
 I'll completely understand if you would all prefer not to comment.

 Sarah

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Arnaud HERVE
On 17/09/2011 19:17, Arnaud HERVE wrote:
 The woman on the right is also more muscular.

I meant the woman on the left, sorry.

Arnaud

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Fred Bauder
A lot of this surgery is cosmetic surgery, thus it is a matter of taste,
not a matter of dysfunction or normality. And, usually, is quite private
and nobody's business. So, I don't see a problem so long as the cosmetic
aspect is clear.

There is a plastic surgeon who specializes in this area that has uploaded
many images for promotional purposes. I'm pretty sure he has quit by now.
That was several years ago.

Fred

 I don't know whether this is worth bothering about, but it's the kind
 of thing that concerns me. Anyone not wanting to look at genitalia
 should not click on the links.

 I came across [[Labiaplasty]], while looking for material on female
 genital mutilation. There's an image on the page of what is supposed
 to be before and after a labiaplasty.

 The previous caption implied that it was the same woman, though it
 doesn't look like it -- for one thing, larger versions of the images
 on the Commons show one has a mole on her abdomen and the other
 doesn't.

 What really bothers me is the before image shows a woman within a
 normal range, yet we are presenting this as something in need of
 surgery. I'm concerned that young women could stumble on this and
 start to doubt themselves.

 The image and upload history are here --
 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hypertrophy_of_Labia_Minora_before_and_after_surgery.jpg

 There's no indication that these are medical images; no indication
 of model release; no reliable sources indicating that the oversized
 one really is regarded as such; and the images were uploaded by
 occasionally used accounts.

 I've twice removed the image from the article,
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Labiaplastyaction=historysubmitdiff=450858934oldid=450796332
 and I've left a note on talk,
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Labiaplasty#Image but it is being
 restored. If anyone wants to jump in, please do. If not, no worries.
 I'll completely understand if you would all prefer not to comment.

 Sarah

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Arnaud HERVE
On 17/09/2011 20:14, Fred Bauder wrote:
 A lot of this surgery is cosmetic surgery, thus it is a matter of taste,
 not a matter of dysfunction or normality. And, usually, is quite private
 and nobody's business.

 From an average citizen's point of view, certainly. From a parent's, 
educator's or non cosmetic doctor point of view, I doubt so.

As I said previously, I am not a doctor, but I am regularly employed as 
a geek placing photos on the local medical faculty's website. I 
understand most people will be shocked by a sense of decency vs 
obscenity here, but for me I almost sigh with relief by seeing something 
perfectly healthy. And although I am not a doctor I am not sure this 
kind of labia should be shown as something in need of surgery.

Now about teenage girls with normal organs who demand surgery as their 
free personal choice, I know it creates quite a lot of trouble in 
families, with sometimes a huge loss of money for average income 
parents, or severe behaviour problems for the girl who doesn't get her 
surgery.

I also believe that the quest for a perfectly formatted body is part 
of the objectification of women.

And last, for the cognitive or educational aspect, it should be 
emphasized that non top model or non porn actress bodies are normal.

Arnaud

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Fred Bauder
 On 17/09/2011 20:14, Fred Bauder wrote:
 A lot of this surgery is cosmetic surgery, thus it is a matter of
 taste,
 not a matter of dysfunction or normality. And, usually, is quite
 private
 and nobody's business.

  From an average citizen's point of view, certainly. From a parent's,
 educator's or non cosmetic doctor point of view, I doubt so.

 As I said previously, I am not a doctor, but I am regularly employed as
 a geek placing photos on the local medical faculty's website. I
 understand most people will be shocked by a sense of decency vs
 obscenity here, but for me I almost sigh with relief by seeing something
 perfectly healthy. And although I am not a doctor I am not sure this
 kind of labia should be shown as something in need of surgery.

 Now about teenage girls with normal organs who demand surgery as their
 free personal choice, I know it creates quite a lot of trouble in
 families, with sometimes a huge loss of money for average income
 parents, or severe behaviour problems for the girl who doesn't get her
 surgery.

 I also believe that the quest for a perfectly formatted body is part
 of the objectification of women.

 And last, for the cognitive or educational aspect, it should be
 emphasized that non top model or non porn actress bodies are normal.

 Arnaud

As is the plastic surgery craze.

Fred



___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Sarah
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 13:00, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
 On 17/09/2011 20:14, Fred Bauder wrote:
 A lot of this surgery is cosmetic surgery, thus it is a matter of
 taste,
 not a matter of dysfunction or normality. And, usually, is quite
 private
 and nobody's business.

  From an average citizen's point of view, certainly. From a parent's,
 educator's or non cosmetic doctor point of view, I doubt so.

 As I said previously, I am not a doctor, but I am regularly employed as
 a geek placing photos on the local medical faculty's website. I
 understand most people will be shocked by a sense of decency vs
 obscenity here, but for me I almost sigh with relief by seeing something
 perfectly healthy. And although I am not a doctor I am not sure this
 kind of labia should be shown as something in need of surgery.

 Now about teenage girls with normal organs who demand surgery as their
 free personal choice, I know it creates quite a lot of trouble in
 families, with sometimes a huge loss of money for average income
 parents, or severe behaviour problems for the girl who doesn't get her
 surgery.

 I also believe that the quest for a perfectly formatted body is part
 of the objectification of women.

 And last, for the cognitive or educational aspect, it should be
 emphasized that non top model or non porn actress bodies are normal.

 Arnaud

I would say the bottom line for Wikipedia is that we need responsible
medical sources saying that an image depicts something outside a
normal range. By responsible, I mean sources not seeking business,
but regular physicians writing peer-reviewed articles -- secondary
sources, i.e. review articles -- about this kind of procedure.

At least that way we would know we weren't misleading women and young
girls into thinking they lie outside the range when in fact they're
perfectly normal.

Sarah

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] Labiaplasty

2011-09-17 Thread Ole Palnatoke Andersen
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
...
 What really bothers me is the before image shows a woman within a
 normal range, yet we are presenting this as something in need of
 surgery. I'm concerned that young women could stumble on this and
 start to doubt themselves.

Somewhat related: The most well-known Danish woman's self-awareness
book, [[da:Kvinde, kend din krop]] was originally published in 1975,
and has been revised several times since. This year, the group behind
the book opened a photo booth in order to collect images of the
diversity of female genitalia. Have a look at it at
http://kvindekenddinkrop.dk/ - use your favourite translation service
if you don't read Danish (no, there are no genitalia on the front page
- the link 'BILLEDERNE' will take you there).

Regards,
Ole

-- 
http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap