Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the day
I changed the image of a uniform example in the gallery of [[Neckline]] to one showing the V-neckline in use by both sexes (and without the confusing additional undershirt neckline). Hope that's more balanced, representative and clear. Gillian On 18 September 2011 06:28, Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.com wrote: Holy...what? I don't know how to respond. From, Emily On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Arnaud HERVE arnaudhe...@x-mail.netwrote: By the way the Italian page shows porn model Aria Giovanni. On 17/09/2011 18:31, Sarah Stierch wrote: Neckline!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neckline The choices are really mediocre for the neckline women's section. One of the photos is titled Boobies.jpg. :P -- GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch and Sarah Stierch Consulting *Historical, cultural artistic research advising.* -- http://www.sarahstierch.com/ ___ Gendergap mailing listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
[Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the day
Neckline!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neckline The choices are really mediocre for the neckline women's section. One of the photos is titled Boobies.jpg. :P -- GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch and Sarah Stierch Consulting *Historical, cultural artistic research advising.* -- http://www.sarahstierch.com/ ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day
On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote: The choices are really mediocre for the neckline women's section. One of the photos is titled Boobies.jpg. I saw that boobies.jpg was changed to Cleavage (breasts).jpg about four hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap! That was the good news The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed that users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but that others put it back up. What I believe is that you had no right to take the picture off without consensus. Please excuse me if I missed something that would prove that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what troubles me is that SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion) called an Administratrix and being told to play by the rules you claim to enforce. Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture isn't a hypertrophy (although I wouldn't know) and I am pleased to see that a note was added early this morning UTC. But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by, which we certainly can, by questioning its licensed medical image status, pointing out that it is two different people, and pointing out that the labia minora are not hypertrophies. --- RDW2210 ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day
I requested the name change for Boobies.jpg today, and was pleased to see that Mattbuck did it quickly. :-) Sydney On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:51 PM, The Richardsons dons...@optonline.netwrote: On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote: The choices are really mediocre for the neckline women's section. One of the photos is titled Boobies.jpg. I saw that “boobies.jpg” was changed to “Cleavage (breasts).jpg” about four hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap! That was the good news The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed that users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but that others put it back up. What I believe is that you had no right to take the picture off without consensus. Please excuse me if I missed something that would prove that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what troubles me is that SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion) called an “Administratrix” and being told to “play by the rules you claim to enforce”. Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture isn’t a “hypertrophy” (although I wouldn’t know) and I am pleased to see that a note was added early this morning UTC. But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by, which we certainly can, by questioning its “licensed medical image” status, pointing out that it is two different people, and pointing out that the labia minora are not hypertrophies. --- RDW2210 ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day
There are some medical wikis out there that might be good to collaborate with: http://askdrwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Physician_Medical_Wiki http://www.medpedia.com/ - This one looks like they also have a Quora like system that lets you ask questions. If those methods don't work, I know a gyno I could contact. On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote: Anyone know a medical doctor/gyno who can perhaps provide some type of documentation/review of the content? Not sure if it would ever matter...but, a solid letter and such could help maybe.. I haven't looked at the article, I admit, it's a subject I'm not comfortable examining Another example of why medical support could be beneficial to Wikipedia as a whole. Sarah (Stierch) Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :) On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:51 PM, The Richardsons dons...@optonline.net wrote: On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote: The choices are really mediocre for the neckline women's section. One of the photos is titled Boobies.jpg. I saw that “boobies.jpg” was changed to “Cleavage (breasts).jpg” about four hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap! That was the good news The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed that users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but that others put it back up. What I believe is that you had no right to take the picture off without consensus. Please excuse me if I missed something that would prove that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what troubles me is that SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion) called an “Administratrix” and being told to “play by the rules you claim to enforce”. Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture isn’t a “hypertrophy” (although I wouldn’t know) and I am pleased to see that a note was added early this morning UTC. But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by, which we certainly can, by questioning its “licensed medical image” status, pointing out that it is two different people, and pointing out that the labia minora are not hypertrophies. --- RDW2210 ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap -- Only the shallow know themselves. - Oscar Wilde ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Re: [Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day
ourmed.org (a MediaWiki wiki) is in NYC and they've come to several of our meetups. (wiki seems kinda dead or at least dormant; per their recentchanges, they seem to have done spam and vandal fighting every day in the last 2 weeks but there's no actual content work for 2 weeks straight AFAICT. of course, that's not really relevant to them having contacts to help with this and I think there's a good chance they would have some.) Their director is GMiller1965 @ enwp. Let me or Pharos know if you'd like us to make an introduction. -Jeremy On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:09, Nicole Willson artisticaltru...@gmail.com wrote: There are some medical wikis out there that might be good to collaborate with: http://askdrwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Physician_Medical_Wiki http://www.medpedia.com/ - This one looks like they also have a Quora like system that lets you ask questions. If those methods don't work, I know a gyno I could contact. On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know a medical doctor/gyno who can perhaps provide some type of documentation/review of the content? Not sure if it would ever matter...but, a solid letter and such could help maybe.. I haven't looked at the article, I admit, it's a subject I'm not comfortable examining Another example of why medical support could be beneficial to Wikipedia as a whole. Sarah (Stierch) ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
