Re: site-lua buildbot job added
On 28 April 2018 at 14:57, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:43:51 +0200 >> From: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: site-lua buildbot job added >> >> On 28 April 2018 at 14:34, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: > > >>> -- The site-lua/docs dir is built from scratch >>> >>> Would this work as 'build.sh' : >>> >>> svn rm docs >>> make >>> svn add docs >> >> >> No need for the SVN commands. > > > So, a local "make ; commit" does something else than > the buildbot's "make" ; in that the buildbot's "make" > magically adds stuff to the repo. > > Correct ? The build.sh script is only intended to build the site. It should not interact with SVN/Git > Any other differences ? > > Is it a problem if the 'make' would "svn add stuff" to the repo ? Yes, because it is up to the Buildbot job how it interacts with SVN/Git - if at all. I added the build.sh script to ensure that there is a standard command to build the site. The current site uses Ant, Jekyll uses Jekyll, and lua uses make. Having a common shell script simplifies changeover. It's also easier for local testing; only one command to remember. > Thanks ; regards, > > > HPP > > _ > Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403_/ \_ > Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityT +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ > Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ > http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/
Re: site-lua buildbot job added
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:43:51 +0200 From: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: Re: site-lua buildbot job added On 28 April 2018 at 14:34, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: -- The site-lua/docs dir is built from scratch Would this work as 'build.sh' : svn rm docs make svn add docs No need for the SVN commands. So, a local "make ; commit" does something else than the buildbot's "make" ; in that the buildbot's "make" magically adds stuff to the repo. Correct ? Any other differences ? Is it a problem if the 'make' would "svn add stuff" to the repo ? Thanks ; regards, HPP _ Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403_/ \_ Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityT +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/
Re: site-lua buildbot job added
On 28 April 2018 at 14:34, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 14:46:09 +0200 >> From: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: site-lua buildbot job added >> >> >> I added a site-lua buildbot job. >> >> It's on demand only (like the jekyll one). >> >> It assumes there is a build.sh script to do the build. >> This makes it easier to update the build without needing to change the >> Buildbot job. > > > ... just for my information ... > > -- The site-lua/docs dir is built from scratch > > Would this work as 'build.sh' : > > svn rm docs > make > svn add docs No need for the SVN commands. c.f. build.sh in site-jekyll > My concern is this : /if/ the 'make' generates new files, > how are they added to a repo, so SvnPubSub/GitPubSub > can publish them on the webservers. That is for buildbot to do; see the existing builder for attic-site as per my earlier mail. > Groeten, > > HPP > > _ > Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403_/ \_ > Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityT +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ > Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ > http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/
Re: site-lua buildbot job added
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 14:46:09 +0200 From: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: site-lua buildbot job added I added a site-lua buildbot job. It's on demand only (like the jekyll one). It assumes there is a build.sh script to do the build. This makes it easier to update the build without needing to change the Buildbot job. ... just for my information ... -- The site-lua/docs dir is built from scratch Would this work as 'build.sh' : svn rm docs make svn add docs My concern is this : /if/ the 'make' generates new files, how are they added to a repo, so SvnPubSub/GitPubSub can publish them on the webservers. Groeten, HPP _ Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403_/ \_ Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityT +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/
