Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover

2012-08-16 Thread Jason Hunter
On Aug 16, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Danny Sinang wrote:

> When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just 
> became the primary forest) need to reindex ?

No.  It will already be indexed and ready to go.

> Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to some 
> other cluster members  ?

No.  The only replication that happens is that which is configured.  You could 
script up whatever actions you wanted, of course.

-jh-

___
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general


Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover

2012-08-16 Thread Wayne Feick
A slight refinement; replicas are equivalent copies rather than exact copies. 
You'll have the same fragments, but likely organized differently into stands.

Wayne


Michael Blakeley  wrote:


No on both questions. Forest replication is just like RAID-1. You set up the 
mirrors, and they are exact copies.

This underscores the importance of monitoring. You want to find out about a 
forest failure immediately - not weeks later, when the replica fails and the 
whole database goes offline.

-- Mike

On 16 Aug 2012, at 08:00 , Danny Sinang wrote:

> Hi,
>
> When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just 
> became the primary forest) need to reindex ?
>
> Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to some 
> other cluster members  ?
>
> Regards,
> Danny
>
>
> ___
> General mailing list
> General@developer.marklogic.com
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

___
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
___
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general


Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover

2012-08-16 Thread Michael Blakeley
No on both questions. Forest replication is just like RAID-1. You set up the 
mirrors, and they are exact copies.

This underscores the importance of monitoring. You want to find out about a 
forest failure immediately - not weeks later, when the replica fails and the 
whole database goes offline.

-- Mike

On 16 Aug 2012, at 08:00 , Danny Sinang wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just 
> became the primary forest) need to reindex ?
> 
> Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to some 
> other cluster members  ?
> 
> Regards,
> Danny
> 
> 
> ___
> General mailing list
> General@developer.marklogic.com
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

___
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general


[MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover

2012-08-16 Thread Danny Sinang
Hi,

When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just
became the primary forest) need to reindex ?

Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to
some other cluster members  ?

Regards,
Danny
___
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general