jaxme on gump (cont)

2004-10-08 Thread Adam R. B. Jack

> > I would suggest we just add the package, then. jaxme is holding up 134
> > projects, let's not add anymore potentially shaky dependencies for now.
>
> May I ask a silly question: How come the number 134? I can hardly
> imagine, that more than two or three of them are actually using JaxMe
> right now?

Stefano was quoting from here (dependees):

http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/project_todos.html

Sure, dom4j is the only direct dependency on jaxme, but upon that are
plenty...

http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/dom4j/dom4j/details.html

... and on it goes.  So, JaxMe is a popular beastie. :-)




Now, to the build...

JM.compile:
[javac] Compiling 193 source files to
/usr/local/gump/test/workspace/ws-jaxme/build/jm/classes
[javac]
/usr/local/gump/test/workspace/ws-jaxme/src/jaxme/org/apache/ws/jaxme/spg/im
pl/BeaverSPG.java:21: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : class Make
[javac] location: package beaver
[javac] import beaver.Make;
[javac]   ^
[javac]
/usr/local/gump/test/workspace/ws-jaxme/src/jaxme/org/apache/ws/jaxme/spg/im
pl/BeaverSPG.java:54: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol  : variable Make
[javac] location: class org.apache.ws.jaxme.spg.impl.BeaverSPG
[javac] Make.main(new String[]{getGrammarFile().getAbsolutePath()});
[javac] ^
[javac] 2 errors

I did an unzip -t beaver*.jar | grep Make (or on beaver.jar and
beaver-rt.jar separately) and found only:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/gump/packages/beaver-0.9.3.4/lib$ unzip -t beaver.jar
| grep Make
testing: beaver/comp/Action$Reduce$Maker.class   OK
testing: beaver/comp/run/Make.class   OK

No beaver.Make. Do we have a Beaver version issue?

regards,

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: jaxme on gump (cont)

2004-10-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
No beaver.Make. Do we have a Beaver version issue?
Seems so. JaxMe is currently using 0.9.2. We can upgrade the JaxMe 
version (probably tomorrow) or downgrade the gump version. Which way to go?

Jochen
--
http://lilypie.com/baby1/050423/1/5/1/+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: jaxme on gump (cont)

2004-10-08 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> > No beaver.Make. Do we have a Beaver version issue?
>
> Seems so. JaxMe is currently using 0.9.2. We can upgrade the JaxMe
> version (probably tomorrow) or downgrade the gump version. Which way to
go?

It is more Gump-like to move forward, but it is your choice.

Tell you what, if you point me to a 0.9.2 I can install that for today.

regards,

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: jaxme on gump (cont)

2004-10-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
It is more Gump-like to move forward, but it is your choice.
Tell you what, if you point me to a 0.9.2 I can install that for today.
Ok, have upgraded to 0.9.3.4.
Jochen
--
http://lilypie.com/baby1/050423/1/5/1/+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]