Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
+1 I downloaded the binary ran a single node cluster and kicked the tires a bit with a few MR jobs. Everything worked. On 5/15/12 9:20 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would like to release. It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/ The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days. thanks, Arun -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/
Re: why hadoop choose maven as its build tool?
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:15 AM, smith jack wrote: > but it used to be ant, why abandon ant? I'd say the following 3 benefits were totally worth the switch: * standardization of build system * standardization of dependency management (for both upstream and downstream projects) * standardization of IDE project imports Of course, all of the above is theoretically possible with Ant/Ivy, but it takes so much pain and discipline that I haven't seen materialize in practical terms. Thanks, Roman.
[ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 1.0.3 available
Hello, I'm happy to announce that Hadoop release 1.0.3 is now available. You may need to wait 24 hours for the release to propagate to some mirrors. This release includes: - 4 patches in support of non-Oracle JDKs > > - several patches to clean up error handling and log messages - various production issue fixes Please see the Release Notes at http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r1.0.3/releasenotes.html for all the details. Best regards, --Matt Foley Release Manager, Hadoop-1.0
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
+1, I also tried it in pseudo-distributed, ran some uber-jobs, etc. I verified the contents of the -src tarball matched svn (modulo the license/readme/text files) The configs in etc/hadoop could do with some improvement, but didn't seem like a blocker. Here is my signature for the src tarball: -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+0K64ACgkQXkPKua7Hfq9gzQCffzIhMOBgC1T4/tziiFzOMYPC piAAoOYO5aDE06cWP50T07Hkxr7f64aq =ostO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thanks -Todd On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Robert Evans wrote: > +1 I downloaded the binary ran a single node cluster and kicked the tires a > bit with a few MR jobs. Everything worked. > > > On 5/15/12 9:20 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > > I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would > like to release. > > It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/ > > The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. > > Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > > -- > Arun C. Murthy > Hortonworks Inc. > http://hortonworks.com/ > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
+1 I kicked the tires on a small cluster. Thanks, Eli On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would > like to release. > > It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/ > > The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. > > Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days. > > thanks, > Arun > > > -- > Arun C. Murthy > Hortonworks Inc. > http://hortonworks.com/ > >
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
On 15 May 2012 19:20, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would > like to release. > > It is available at: > http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/ > > The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. > > Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days. > > +1, ship it
Re: why hadoop choose maven as its build tool?
I would also mention a benefit of testing and inter-component integration standardization. This is, essentially, what BigTop has done by introducing and supporting open-source solution for creating and validating Hadoop stacks. Funnily enough, this simple concept was too hard to grok for some of the commercial vendors. The management there were literally insisting on doing _manual_ testing for their packages (at least at the time that when I was working for one of them and observing it:) But I guess this is a different story... Cos On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:15 AM, smith jack wrote: > > but it used to be ant, why abandon ant? > > I'd say the following 3 benefits were totally worth the switch: >* standardization of build system >* standardization of dependency management (for both upstream and > downstream projects) >* standardization of IDE project imports > > Of course, all of the above is theoretically possible with > Ant/Ivy, but it takes so much pain and discipline that > I haven't seen materialize in practical terms. > > Thanks, > Roman. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
