Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects
Mark Brouwer wrote: I would be saddened if we can't maintain "Jini" as project name, but if it has to become something like "Genie" would it still be possible to do the following: - Create various specification deliverables that are of the form "Jini bla bla bla Specification/API". - Specifications/API in the net.jini namespace. And remember that there is no body outside the ASF project that defines those specifications, that is the job of the ASF project. Anyone? -- Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
committers / ppmc
Hi general, we voted recently two committers in to our Podling (Trinidad / ADF Faces). We'd like to add these committers to our PPMC. Are there any special rules, for that? for instance, I know that the Struts guys wait a half year or so, before committers will be added to the PMC. In MyFaces PMC we do something similar. I couldn't found such a rule for the Incubator Podlings. So I'd like to move forward on that. Since I am not really sure, I ping you guys, in case of ;) Thanks! Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Trinidad Podling] Vote for a new committer
Hi * The vote is done 4 +1 (binding) 4 +1 (non-binding) 0 -1 (more see thread for [1] ) I sent out an invitation to Simon, Thx, Matthias [1] http://tinyurl.com/h3xr4 On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey guys, as mentioned in [1] we discussed on the PPMC a nominee for a new committer - Simon Lessard. The real vote takes place on the public adffaces dev list. This mail is to keep the IPMC updated, as mentioned in [1]. I'll start this vote *after* this mail has been sent ;-) -Matthias [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] approve the 4.0.2 release of ActiveMQ
Doh. thanks for checking.. I've opened a JIRA up for those issues: http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-888 I'm going to use the perl scripts to find the files that are missing the headers. On 8/18/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/17/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the > Apache ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0.2 release > binary. > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > perform the release. (i've only reviewed the source but it's late for me and i've found some blockers so forgive me if i don't review the binary distribution as well) notes: F5BA7E4F does not seem to be available from major pgp network keyservers. see http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver-upload the source downloads extracts to a folder called incubator-activemq-4.0.2. this is the same as the folder to which the binary distribution extracts to. it's more convenient for users if these distributions unpack to different directories. it's conventional to use incubator-activemq-4.0.2-src. blockers: missing license headers from some of the files i checked at random gives me concerns. for example: maven-bundle-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/maven/BundleMojo.java activemq-web-demo worries me: there are a lot of files without license headers and some which have them were not created at the ASF (which is ok but gives me concerns about the rest). i would like to see the issue of licenses in the source tidied up before this release ships. i haven't gone through every file but IMO this needs to be done. (we need a script or something to check for license headers) - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] approve the 4.0.2 release of ActiveMQ
robert burrell donkin wrote: > > missing license headers from some of the files i checked at random > gives me concerns. for example: > > maven-bundle-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/maven/BundleMojo.java > > activemq-web-demo worries me: there are a lot of files without license > headers and some which have them were not created at the ASF (which is > ok but gives me concerns about the rest). > > i would like to see the issue of licenses in the source tidied up > before this release ships. i haven't gone through every file but IMO > this needs to be done. > > (we need a script or something to check for license headers) The stuff at https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/src/perl/ has a practice mode which scans for existing and missing license headers. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
