[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Simple Remote Shell
Hi, The Apache Felix project has received a contribution of the Simple Remote Shell from Dieter Wimberger * The code is attached to the FELIX-615 JIRA issue [1] * The IP Clearance form has been committed to the Incubator website. [2] * A vote has passed on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list [3] The clearance passes by lazy consensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours. Thanks and Regards Felix [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-615 [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-remote-shell.html [3] http://markmail.org/message/65ualfc4s2lnfkwz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
report wiki page
I've populated the report wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2008 (I was surprised it was empty this close to the deadline, did I miss something where it was moved?) - Brett -- Brett Porter Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple concerns reviewing BlueSky podling website
Does anyone from Bluesky care to comment and/or act on this? IMO the bluesky website needs to be fixed *immediately*, by removing all download links and misleading license-related statements. -Bertrand On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues : - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF release. Is this OK ? As others have indicated, the download links at http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ point directly to non-ASF servers hosting, in some cases, GPL-licensed code (XPlayer), without any mention that said releases were made outside of the ASF. This is totally unacceptable. What would be ok, IMHO, is for the apache.org bluesky pages to point to a download page on another server, which lists the downloads and their licenses, and is clearly labelled as non-ASF. Bluesky mentors, is this being fixed? http://markmail.org/message/l245dde7cjhwzmkj vaguely hints at correcting things as quickly as possible, but it's been nine days since Luciano's message, and the download links are still up at http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: report wiki page
Hi Brett Porter schrieb: I've populated the report wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2008 Thanks, just added the Sling report. Regards Felix - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator
We're still discussing naming options, including the option to stick with PicaGalley, on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll keep this vote open until we settle on a name, and a few days longer if that is not PicaGalley. cheers, Roland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple concerns reviewing BlueSky podling website
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Does anyone from Bluesky care to comment and/or act on this?.. See replies on the bluesky dev list, http://markmail.org/message/rdsuudsaspqanlla -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Hi Everyone, Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig 0.1.0-incubating. We had 4 +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes. (Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) . The artifacts are available at http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/ http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/ Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14. Olga
