Fwd: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

2010-11-20 Thread Siegfried Goeschl

Hi folks,

forwarding my comment regarding the Skype discussion on 
gene...@incubation to keep you in the loop ... :-)


Cheers,

Siegfried Goeschl


 Original Message 
Subject: [ISIS] Re: Conference call
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:41:01 +0100
From: Siegfried Goeschl siegfried.goes...@it20one.at
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org, siegfried.goes...@it20one.at
Organization: IT20one GmbH
To: general@incubator.apache.org

Hi folks,

open source projects are done by individuals. And individuals like to
communicate during long  lonely nights in front of the keyboard. And
meeting the other ISIS developers is difficult since the are spread
around the globe.

So if the ISIS developer/users/mentors/community decide to run a regular
Skype meeting to meet each other electronically assuming

+) that the meeting is announced on the dev list

+) that we not exclude any interested party (apart from troll feeding)

+) that no official statement/vote is circumvented

than I don't see any good reason why someone could complain about it
and/or impose rules how to organize such a come together.

Speaking as one of the participants

+) I was impressed by Dan's energy to organize the meeting

+) I was delighted that we were a dozen developers on Skype

*) I was glad to answer a few questions about the ASF (despite being
seriously distracted by my two daughters on my lap)


Cheers,

Siegfried Goeschl
Apache ISIS Mentor

On 11/19/10 10:52 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:


On Nov 19, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Greg Stein wrote:


A full transcription shouldn't be necessary.


I agree. Transcript is too strong for what I think needs to be done,
which is...


Just bring a summary of
discussion points back to the list, along with any recommendations.
The list can then sort through it and make decisions.


What you said. Not a transcript but a list of topics and discussion
points which continue on list.

Craig


We have off-list discussions all the time (IM, IRC, in-person). We
don't transcribe those. We just bring the discussion onto the list for
wrapping it up with everybody present. Skype concalls are no different
than these other forums.

Cheers,
-g

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 13:18, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:

My $0.02:

The business of Apache is conducted on email.

It's fine to have a periodic conference call among interested project
participants, as long as (my list, not normative):

no project or community member is excluded (e.g. by posting the call
information only to a private list)

no decisions are made during the call

all topics discussed are subsequently posted via email to the project
members

Having an audio transcript is interesting but doesn't pass my email
test. So
I'd have to say that someone needs to transcribe the audio into email.

Craig

On Nov 19, 2010, at 9:29 AM, James Carman wrote:


I don't know about this. Whatever we do has to be trackable and
open, so I don't know about this Skype stuff. Requiring folks to
watch a video or listen to an audio recording rather than reading a
transcript is probably not a good idea. I'm copying the general list
to see what others have to say.

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:


Good idea

+1 on the Skype monthly meeting.

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Alexander Krasnukhin
the.malk...@gmail.com wrote:


At least it makes me feel ISIS is really going somewhere. I don't
know
how
to explain this. E.g. there are some real ALIVE people involved :).

Monthly is good.

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Mike Burton
mi...@mycosystems.co.ukwrote:


Yes very useful interesting and enjoyable, thanks for organising it.
Yes
monthly similar would be good.

Mike

On 19 Nov 2010, at 10:49, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:


First off, thanks to all for attending, and I really enjoyed the


opportunity. Hope it was useful. It was nice, actually, to read the
transcript on the Skype IM call afterwards (I didn't get the oppo
to do
that
while I was demo'ing).


Second, my apols that I didn't have the demo working. Of course,
after


the call finished I figured out the problem in about 2 minutes.
At any
rate, the details on running the demo for yourselves are on the
SmokeTest
page on the wiki [1].


Third, per a recording, like Kevin I also recorded the call using


CallGraph, though mine seems to have recorded ok. It's about 92Mb,
recorded it in stereo, and what Skype did is distribute the voices
across
the spectrum, which I think is quite nice. Anyway, I've just
uploaded
it to
my dropbox account and I'll post the URL on isis-private. (If you
aren't
subscribed there, contact me directly).


Lastly, it'd be nice to do a similar call like that now and
again. We


could perhaps set one up every month, attendance purely optional.
Thoughts?


Cheers
Dan

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/ISIS/smoketest.html

~~

On 18/11/2010 20:08, Kevin Meyer - KMZ wrote:


Hi Dan,

Thanks for organizing the call.

I 

[VOTE] ESME Graduation to TLP

2010-11-20 Thread Richard Hirsch
Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,

The ESME community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1] and we
just concluded a vote on the subject [2]. There is
overwhelming consensus in the community (all +1 VOTEs including those from
our mentors) that we've achieved what's required here in the Incubator, and
so we'd like to put forth the following board resolution for the next Board
meeting to promote ESME to an Apache TLP and graduate from the Incubator.

Please VOTE on the below resolution for promoting ESME to an Apache TLP and
graduating from the Incubator. The VOTE is open for 72 hrs.

[ ] +1 Accept ESME's graduation from the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept ESME's graduation from the Incubator because...

=
Establish the Apache ESME Project

  WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
  interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
  Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
  Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
  open-source software related to collaborative messaging systems
  for distribution at no charge to the public.

  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
  Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache ESME Project,
  be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
  Foundation; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the Apache ESME Project be and hereby is
  responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
  related to collaborative messaging systems; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache ESME be
  and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
  serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
  of the Apache ESME Project, and to have primary responsibility
  for management of the project within the scope of
  responsibility of the Apache ESME Project; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
  hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
  Apache ESME Project:

*  Anne Kathrine Petteroeakpe...@apache.org
*  Darren Hague   dha...@apache.org
*  Ethan Jewettesje...@apache.org
*  Mrinal Wadhwamri...@apache.org
*  Richard Hirsch rhir...@apache.org
*  Vassil Dichev   vdic...@apache.org
*  Imtiaz Ahmed H Eimt...@apache.org
*  Bertrand Delacretazbdel...@apache.org

  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Richard Hirsch
  be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ESME, to
  serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
  Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
  death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
  or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ESME PMC be and hereby is
  tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
  encourage open development and increased participation in the
  Apache ESME Project; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that the Apache ESME Project be and hereby
  is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
  Incubator ESME podling; and be it further

  RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
  Incubator ESME podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
  Project are hereafter discharged.
=

Here's my +1 (binding).

Regards,
Dick

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/gv5msai5acgfwjz4
[2] http://markmail.org/thread/krf7nwf7swsde2ys

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org