Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.3.0-incubating
On 03/10/2012 07:10 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version > 0.3.0-incubating. > > *** Please download, test, and vote by Friday, March 16 > > Note that we are voting on the source (tag): release-0.3.0-incubating-RC0 > > Source tarball, checksums, signature: > http://people.apache.org/~rvs/bigtop-0.3.0-incubating-RC0/ > > The tag to be voted on: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.3.0-incubating-RC0/ > > Please also make sure to try installing our convenience binary distribution > artifacts. We are publishing the Bigtop 0.3.0 incubating distributions for the > following Linux platforms: Ubuntu 10.04, CentOS 5, CentOS 6, Fedora 15, > Fedora 16, SLES 11. The easies way to install Bigtop distribution on > your favorite Linux OS is to pick one of the attached files, and place > it (as root) > in the following folder: >* Ubuntu -- /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ >* CentOS5, CentOS6, Fedora 15, Fedora 16 -- /etc/yum.repos.d/ >* SLES 11 -- /etc/zypp/repos.d/ > After that you can follow the installation instructions from over here (DO NOT > FORGET TO SKIP STEPS #1 and #2): > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/How+to+install+Hadoop+distribution+from+Bigtop > > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS > > Thanks! > > Bigtop 0.3.0 release manager, > Roman Shaposhnik I have started testing this release yesterday by doing a full deployment / tests. But I found at least an issue I would consider a blocker for this RC: see BIGTOP-446. I provisioned 20 CentOS 6 machines (8 core, 23GB RAM each), used our puppet recipes to deploy this RC and tried to run some of my code on it (importing a dump of freebase in my triplestore and query it) Here are some notes: 1/ typo in puppet recipes. BIGTOP-446 2/ zookeeper wasn't started. Once I manually started the service (without any issue), everything got unblocked. Probably worth opening a ticket. 3/ hbase-master couldn't start because it could not connect to zookeeper because of 2/ 4/ Somehow, the jobtracker and hdfs directories got set up only after the zookeeper issue got resolved (because of 2/) 5/ I noticed quite a few crashes on the tasktracker/regionservers. Their stack traces are from being helpful. But this is an upstream issue (or me/puppet doing something stupid). 6/ Because of 5/, it would be nice to have some supervisor processes 7/ It would also be very helpful to have some munin/collectd/ganglia/nagios integration 8/ It would be nice to be able to configure HBASE heap 9/ I would rather configure hadoop heap as a percentage of available ram, instead of an absolute value Overall I really enjoyed it! The combination of puppet recipes and packages made it really easy to go from nothing to a 20 machine hadoop cluster. Thanks, Bruno - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Tashi 201203-incubating
The vote to release Apache Tashi 201203-incubating has passed with 3 binding +1 votes, no 0 votes and no -1 votes. Voting was open for more than 72 hours. Binding +1: Craig L Russell (Mentor, PPMC vote carry-forward) ant elder Jukka Zitting Thanks! Michael. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
March report draft
Hi, With all podling reports in and a draft preamble in place (still working on it), I think the Incubator board report on the wiki [1] is pretty close to being ready for submission. I'll submit the report to the board in about 24 hours, so be quick if there are any more comments or updates. PS. Mentor sign-offs are currently standing at: 0: Etch, Kato, RAT, Wave 1: Accumulo, Bloodhound, Hama, HCatalog, Isis, S4 2: Bigtop, Cordova, DeviceMap, Kalumet, ManifoldCF, MRUnit, Openmeetings, OpenOffice, Rave 3: Flex, Flume, Sqoop, Syncope [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2012 BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: S4 status (was: Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports)
Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks. Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200: > Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100: > > Just pick one from the list (ideally one that you aren't directly > > mentoring), read the submitted report (if one exists!) and compare it > > to the previous report (for most podlings that's the one from December > > [2]) and a quick browsing of things like the podling status page [3], > > web site, list archives and svn commit history. Then, if needed, > > follow up with a "$podling status" mail to general@ for any feedback > > or questions that you may have. You may also place the podling in the > > appropriate category in the report summary if the review gave you a > > good enough picture of the podling status. > > > > Thanks for the actionable item Jukka, here's my take on the S4 report: > > It sounds like the project has successfully migrated its infrastructure > to Apache and is progressing well on the technical front. However, I'm > concerned by the emphasis on technical details (eg, the feature list of > the trunk-become-0.5 version) and the lack of details on "Grow the > community"; it is the latter, not the former, which is the purpose of > the incubator and a blocker to graduation. > > The community appears to consist of 2-3 active contributors: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-s4-dev/201202.mbox/author > I'd like to hear from the PPMC how they plan to expand their dev > community. > > Daniel > > P.S. The metrics aren't really clear. What is "55 on dev" --- 55 unique > posters? 55 posts? Did they change by more than X% since last quarter? > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2012 > > [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2011 > > [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ > > > > BR, > > > > Jukka Zitting > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Request for an early review of an potential Apache OpenOffice release
Hi, we have prepared a new developer snapshot on the way to our first release. We would very much appreciate some early feedback if possible. The AOO3.4 release will be an important milestone for the project and I think also for Apache to show that project is up and running. And that Apache is able to host and drive the project forward. Kind regards Juergen On 3/8/12 10:50 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, the Apache OpenOffice podling project is moving forward to a first release that is long expected by the OpenOffice.org community and users. You know that Apache OpenOffice is the continuation of OpenOffice.org and that the project is very huge, has a very long history and a very huge user base all over the world. IP clearance work to conform to Apache standards" or "to conform to the Apache Way and we would like to get some early feedback if we are in shape with the Apache guidelines for a potential release. We have prepared developer snapshots over the past several weeks for our project members to test and review. This developer snapshots can be found under Source package http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/src_releases/srcrelease.html Binary package https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots The mac version is also signed and the check files can be found in the download directory directly http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/macos/r1296433/ NOTE: Be careful with the binary packages and save your office user profiles before testing. Existing OOo 3.x installations will be overwritten. We provide full install sets to test system integration and upgrades. Currently we are not able to migrate installed extensions. And there won't be bundled dictionaries but you can download a dictionary from the migrated extensions repository (http://aoo-extensions.sourceforge.net/). But of course we are working on this. Please rename your user profile before testing our snapshot build, and re-rename your user profile after reinstalling a stable OOo version. Right now we are focusing on show stopper issues but nevertheless we would like to invite you to review the source packages and also the binary packages if they fulfill the Apache requirements (e.g license, NOTICE, ...) We know that we have no release candidate (RC) right now and that it would require some work by you. But because of the complexity of the project we would very much appreciate any kind of early feedback at this time. And the main goal is to fix potential issues early and to save time later on when we have a first RC in place. On behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PPMC Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Flume status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "March2012" by ArvindPrabhakar)
Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Since you have been reading the dev list I am sure you are already aware, > but as one of the mentors I also consider this project ready for graduation. > While they perform their work a little differently than in other projects I'm > involved in, it seems to work for them. The community seems quiet healthy > and I suspect that once they have more solid releases based upon the > current trunk the community is going to be quite active. Sounds good, thanks for the background! > The one concern I do have is that there are some PPMC members who > joined the project when it started in the incubator who have never been heard > from. Is there any "normal" way of handling that on graduation? I would > think > at least asking them to confirm they would like to be on the PMC after > graduation would be appropriate. Yes, you can drop inactive members from the TLP resolution. See for example http://markmail.org/message/3x7jatwgucsqcpmr for how Qpid did this a few years ago. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: S4 status (was: Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports)
+s4-dev@ On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks. > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200: >> Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100: >> > Just pick one from the list (ideally one that you aren't directly >> > mentoring), read the submitted report (if one exists!) and compare it >> > to the previous report (for most podlings that's the one from December >> > [2]) and a quick browsing of things like the podling status page [3], >> > web site, list archives and svn commit history. Then, if needed, >> > follow up with a "$podling status" mail to general@ for any feedback >> > or questions that you may have. You may also place the podling in the >> > appropriate category in the report summary if the review gave you a >> > good enough picture of the podling status. >> > >> >> Thanks for the actionable item Jukka, here's my take on the S4 report: >> >> It sounds like the project has successfully migrated its infrastructure >> to Apache and is progressing well on the technical front. However, I'm >> concerned by the emphasis on technical details (eg, the feature list of >> the trunk-become-0.5 version) and the lack of details on "Grow the >> community"; it is the latter, not the former, which is the purpose of >> the incubator and a blocker to graduation. >> >> The community appears to consist of 2-3 active contributors: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-s4-dev/201202.mbox/author >> I'd like to hear from the PPMC how they plan to expand their dev >> community. >> >> Daniel >> >> P.S. The metrics aren't really clear. What is "55 on dev" --- 55 unique >> posters? 55 posts? Did they change by more than X% since last quarter? >> >> > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2012 >> > [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2011 >> > [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ >> > >> > BR, >> > >> > Jukka Zitting >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: S4 status (was: Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports)
Thanks for your interest in the project. Here are my thoughts about the points raised. >>> I'd like to hear from the PPMC how they plan to expand their dev >>> community. I expect us to attract more developers by increasing awareness. We have given presentations about the project internally (at least at Yahoo!) and externally. Some of the developers have written a paper about it and presented in 2010 (KDCloud) and we have proposed a talk for the next hadoop summit. Hopefully as developers hear more about the project they will feel compelled to join the community and contribute. We also expect to attract more attention once we have a release out (I believe we are close to cut a release). With a release, we can write a few blog posts about it and promote the project. Is there anything important I'm missing? >>> P.S. The metrics aren't really clear. What is "55 on dev" --- 55 unique >>> posters? 55 posts? Did they change by more than X% since last quarter? We don't have numbers from previous quarters. The only other number I have is 124 watchers on github. -Flavio On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > +s4-dev@ > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: >> Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks. >> >> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200: >>> Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100: Just pick one from the list (ideally one that you aren't directly mentoring), read the submitted report (if one exists!) and compare it to the previous report (for most podlings that's the one from December [2]) and a quick browsing of things like the podling status page [3], web site, list archives and svn commit history. Then, if needed, follow up with a "$podling status" mail to general@ for any feedback or questions that you may have. You may also place the podling in the appropriate category in the report summary if the review gave you a good enough picture of the podling status. >>> >>> Thanks for the actionable item Jukka, here's my take on the S4 report: >>> >>> It sounds like the project has successfully migrated its infrastructure >>> to Apache and is progressing well on the technical front. However, I'm >>> concerned by the emphasis on technical details (eg, the feature list of >>> the trunk-become-0.5 version) and the lack of details on "Grow the >>> community"; it is the latter, not the former, which is the purpose of >>> the incubator and a blocker to graduation. >>> >>> The community appears to consist of 2-3 active contributors: >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-s4-dev/201202.mbox/author >>> I'd like to hear from the PPMC how they plan to expand their dev >>> community. >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> P.S. The metrics aren't really clear. What is "55 on dev" --- 55 unique >>> posters? 55 posts? Did they change by more than X% since last quarter? >>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2012 [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2011 [3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
