Re: [VOTE] Graduate JSPWiki from Incubator

2012-04-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
 ...At this time, it would be prudent to withdraw this vote from consideration
 address all identified concerns, and wait for another day to put forward
 this vote again, once i's are dotted, and t's are crossed

+1

To me, the stats at [1] and [2] show a steady decrease in activity
since 2009, but it seems like the project started being slightly more
active again in 2012. If it's actually the case, waiting until there's
steady activity and proper apache releases might help convince the
project mentors that it's ready for graduation.

-Bertrand

[1] http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fincubator%2Fjspwiki
[2] http://jspwiki.markmail.org/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc2

2012-04-19 Thread Brock Noland
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.

It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316360

*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].

Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for convenience.

Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.9.0-incubating-candidate-2/

Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-070/

The tag to be voted upon:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating/

MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS

Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

2012-04-19 Thread Brock Noland
Hi,

OK, sounds good.  I updated the notice and will create a new RC.

Brock

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi Brock, see these:

 http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
 http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html (older)

 Junit is CPL, checkout the text How should so-called Weak Copyleft
 Licenses be handled?, including Software under the following
 licenses may be included in binary form within an Apache product if
 the inclusion is appropriately labeled.

 Regards,

 Patrick

 On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 Patrick,

 I think we should resolve this, but I am wondering s this a strict
 requirement for this release? In looking for the correct entry for
 JUnit I noticed hadoop-1.0.2 distributes the JUnit jar and nothing is
 mentioned in the NOTICE.txt.

 Brock

 On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-103 once we get
 that fixed I will spin up another RC.

 Brock

 On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 -1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
 there is nothing in the notice for this.

 Patrick

 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is

 +1  3  Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
 -1   0

 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jim Donofrio donofrio...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Brock,

 I guess you can email this up to general@incubator.apache.org now, right?


 On 04/17/2012 08:23 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:

 +1

 * Verified signature
 * Checked license files
 * build + test on both binary and src artifacts

 Jarcec

 On Apr 17, 2012, at 2:38 AM, Jim Donofrio wrote:

 +1 verified signature, successfully built for both hadoop 1.0.2 and
 0.23.1 using mvn clean package and mvn clean package -Dhadoop.version=2

 On 04/16/2012 01:57 PM, Brock Noland wrote:

 This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version
 0.9.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues:

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316360

 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].

 Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
 for convenience.

 Source and binary files:
 http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.9.0-incubating-candidate-1/

 Maven staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-057/

 The tag to be voted upon:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating/

 MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS

 Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
 successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.





 --
 Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - 
 http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/



 --
 Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/



 --
 Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/



-- 
Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

2012-04-19 Thread Brock Noland
Patrick,

I think we should resolve this, but I am wondering s this a strict
requirement for this release? In looking for the correct entry for
JUnit I noticed hadoop-1.0.2 distributes the JUnit jar and nothing is
mentioned in the NOTICE.txt.

Brock

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-103 once we get
 that fixed I will spin up another RC.

 Brock

 On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 -1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
 there is nothing in the notice for this.

 Patrick

 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is

 +1  3  Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
 -1   0

 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jim Donofrio donofrio...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Brock,

 I guess you can email this up to general@incubator.apache.org now, right?


 On 04/17/2012 08:23 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:

 +1

 * Verified signature
 * Checked license files
 * build + test on both binary and src artifacts

 Jarcec

 On Apr 17, 2012, at 2:38 AM, Jim Donofrio wrote:

 +1 verified signature, successfully built for both hadoop 1.0.2 and
 0.23.1 using mvn clean package and mvn clean package -Dhadoop.version=2

 On 04/16/2012 01:57 PM, Brock Noland wrote:

 This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version
 0.9.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues:

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316360

 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].

 Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
 for convenience.

 Source and binary files:
 http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.9.0-incubating-candidate-1/

 Maven staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-057/

 The tag to be voted upon:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating/

 MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS

 Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
 successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.





 --
 Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/



 --
 Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/



-- 
Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Question RE a non-ASF hosted project requiring contributors to have a signed ICLA submitted to the ASF

2012-04-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
Bertrand suggested to send this question here.

I have a non-ASF hosted project (jszip.org hosted on github in case you are
interested), which I am hoping to build enough of a developer community
(currently it is just me) around to be able to bring it into the ASF.

To this end, I am licensing it under the ASL.

I don't want to have to maintain the ICLAs and CCLAs of contributors.

Would it be OK if instead I just require that they have a signed ICLA with
the ASF and that they grant the copyright to the ASF since my eventual
intent is to bring this project into the ASF (once I have sufficient
community to bring it in that is! ;-) )

Thanks for considering this question.

-Stephen


Re: [VOTE] Graduate JSPWiki from Incubator

2012-04-19 Thread Harry Metske
well, I see that someone already did a chmod 0.
I removed them from the dist area.

kind regards,
Harry

2012/4/18 Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name

 Ross Gardler wrote on Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 21:25:06 +0100:
  On 18 April 2012 05:43, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
   On 4/17/2012 3:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
   -1
  
   Unless I am mistaken JSPWiki has not yet made a release under the
   Apache license:
  
   Release 2.9 as first Apache release
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-717
  
   http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/
  
   Apparently this was released.
 
  Interesting.
 
  My -1 was posted to this list at  4/17/2012 3:57 AM the last update
  timestamp 2012-04-17 19:26
 
  A little investigation on the JSP dev list is revealing, in short no
  vote (I don't believe there is ill intent either, just a
  misunderstanding of how we work)
  http://markmail.org/message/lkz77tzyk4onks3f
 
  My -1 stands, this is not a release and is not sanctioned by the ASF
  (I'll forward this to infra to ensure they know it is there).

 What do you want to do about the archive.a.o copy of the release?
 rm *?  chmod 0 *?  touch VERSION-x.y-IS-NOT-AN-ASF-RELEASE?



Re: Question RE a non-ASF hosted project requiring contributors to have a signed ICLA submitted to the ASF

2012-04-19 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/19/2012 9:03 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
 
 I have a non-ASF hosted project (jszip.org hosted on github in case you are
 interested), which I am hoping to build enough of a developer community
 (currently it is just me) around to be able to bring it into the ASF.
 
 To this end, I am licensing it under the ASL.

Sensible; although this would be the AL.  There is no 'S' in license v2.0.

 I don't want to have to maintain the ICLAs and CCLAs of contributors.
 
 Would it be OK if instead I just require that they have a signed ICLA with
 the ASF and that they grant the copyright to the ASF since my eventual
 intent is to bring this project into the ASF (once I have sufficient
 community to bring it in that is! ;-) )
 
 Thanks for considering this question.

It has been repeatedly argued that ICLA, CCLA are not actually necessary to
produce an AL 2.0 work.  They help clarify intent.  If you have another way
of clarifying intent, use that.  Document it, at least for yourself.  Take
our jira and bugzilla account creation logic, you license all contributions
made under your account as AL code.  And the AL has its own intrinsic language
to help assure AL contributions are recognizably AL.

Now, none of these people will become committers at the ASF without an ICLA,
end of story.  But that's up to them if they want to travel with the code,
in any case you have an AL work coming in, and for every committer who tags
along and files an ICLA, the better the paper trail becomes.

AL clause 5 puts the burden on the contributor to show they expressly and
carefully avoided granting an AL if they send you their work, end of story.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



adding Syncope PPMC to the incubator group

2012-04-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys,

following Apache Syncope PPMC members are not included in the
`incubator` group and cannot deploy artifacts on Nexus.
I asked Infra guys via IRC and they suggested me following up the
discussion here at general@
Can anyone please add them to `incubator`?

Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo

SVN id Name
=
anzelld Dino Anzellotti
fmartelliFabio Martelli
geertGeert van der Ploeg
ilgrosso Francesco Chicchiriccò
massi   Massimiliano Perrone
mdisabatino Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro
nscendoni   Nicola Scendoni


http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)

2012-04-19 Thread Benjamin Hindman
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for
Mesos in Apache, but the sixth release candidate.

Changes since RC4:
  * Updated NOTICE to include project name and copyright date as well as to
include third-party licences.
  * Changed one of our third-party components to be included as an archive
of it's source rather than a binary bundle (Python egg).
  * Added DISCLAIMER.

The candidate for Mesos 0.9.0-incubating release is available at:

http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz

The tag to be voted on:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating-RC5

The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:

http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.md5

The signature of the tarball can be found at:

http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc

Mesos' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/dist/KEYS

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating!

The vote is open until Monday, April 23rd at 8 pm (a bit more than 72 hours
since it's over the weekend) and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC
votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

To learn more about Apache Mesos, please see
http://incubator.apache.org/mesos.


Re: adding Syncope PPMC to the incubator group

2012-04-19 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
 following Apache Syncope PPMC members are not included in the
 `incubator` group and cannot deploy artifacts on Nexus.

All new podling accounts are by default added to the incubator group.

It looks like only Francesco Chicchiriccò (ilgrosso) wasn't included
since he's already a Cocoon committer.

I added him also to the incubator group.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)

2012-04-19 Thread Matei Zaharia
+1

Tested it on Mac OS X, and it seems to work fine.

Matei

On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:

 Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
 (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for
 Mesos in Apache, but the sixth release candidate.
 
 Changes since RC4:
  * Updated NOTICE to include project name and copyright date as well as to
 include third-party licences.
  * Changed one of our third-party components to be included as an archive
 of it's source rather than a binary bundle (Python egg).
  * Added DISCLAIMER.
 
 The candidate for Mesos 0.9.0-incubating release is available at:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz
 
 The tag to be voted on:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating-RC5
 
 The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.md5
 
 The signature of the tarball can be found at:
 
 http://people.apache.org/~benh/mesos-0.9.0-incubating-RC5/mesos-0.9.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc
 
 Mesos' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos/dist/KEYS
 
 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating!
 
 The vote is open until Monday, April 23rd at 8 pm (a bit more than 72 hours
 since it's over the weekend) and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC
 votes are cast.
 
 [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating
 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
 
 To learn more about Apache Mesos, please see
 http://incubator.apache.org/mesos.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org