Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating)
On 01.12.2012 08:37, Luciano Resende wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Joachim Dreimann joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com wrote: Hi, I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. The result of the vote is summarised here: http://markmail.org/thread/owksv6lbcs6zq7th The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS can be found here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/ The release itself is created from: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/tags/0.3-incubating/ (r1412891) Issues identified to be fixed for the next release are listed here: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/273 https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/274 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.3 [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain) Cheers, Joe -- Joe Dreimann UX Designer | WANdisco http://www.wandisco.com/ License and notice seems fine and couple of the issues found during the vote on the dev list dosen't seem blocking. +1 binding. Thank you, Luciano. We now have two binding IPMC votes, one from a mentor, and one from another IPMC member who was kind enough to be provoked into action by said mentor's troll. Any other takers? :) -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating))
I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified (again) by Branko. This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve it for existing podlings, and podlings where mentors have gone quiet but we need to express higher expectations of mentors for new podlings. Branko, talk to your mentors. If that fails talk to the IPMC. Sent from my tablet On Dec 1, 2012 7:36 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release tarball from a podling. Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release every couple weeks; yet the 0.2 vote thread sat in general@ for longer than that. It's worse for these mails to go unanswered than if the release had been vetoed. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. -- Brane -1 for extending the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. BTW, have you got any IPMC binding votes from your mentors ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating))
Sorry, seems it was Luciano I agreed with. Sent from my tablet On Dec 1, 2012 8:43 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified (again) by Branko. This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve it for existing podlings, and podlings where mentors have gone quiet but we need to express higher expectations of mentors for new podlings. Branko, talk to your mentors. If that fails talk to the IPMC. Sent from my tablet On Dec 1, 2012 7:36 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release tarball from a podling. Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release every couple weeks; yet the 0.2 vote thread sat in general@ for longer than that. It's worse for these mails to go unanswered than if the release had been vetoed. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. -- Brane -1 for extending the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. BTW, have you got any IPMC binding votes from your mentors ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating))
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release tarball from a podling. Reviewing a release when you are not directly involved as a developer is **really hard**. As an IPMC member yourself, have you ever reviewed a release for podling you were not involved with? There have been release candidates for podlings other than Bloodhound which have gone waiting. A detailed review from you on one of those -- with or without a vote, comprehensive or partial -- would be a welcome contribution. Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release every couple weeks; I suspect that pace is not realistic while Bloodhound remains in the Incubator unless the podling manages to land a third core contributor who is also on the IPMC to go with yourself and Hyrum. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. -1 That's at odds with basic, ASF-wide rules for voting on releases. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases
On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release tarball from a podling. Reviewing a release when you are not directly involved as a developer is **really hard**. As an IPMC member yourself, have you ever reviewed a release for podling you were not involved with? Yes. In fact, I spent time reviewing AOO incubator releases. Don't recall if I actually voted on one; probably not, since there were so many other active IPMC members all over that. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. -1 That's at odds with basic, ASF-wide rules for voting on releases. I know; but it got everyone's attention, didn't it. :) What I'd more seriously like to propose is that we come up with a tool that slurps the general@ archives and pings the list once a week with a reminder about outstanding votes. I'll happily invest my copious free time towards that, if the IPMC agrees such a tool would be useful. -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases
That tool would be useful in more places than the incubator. Great idea. I'm looking forward to seeing it ;-) Sent from my tablet On Dec 1, 2012 2:51 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release tarball from a podling. Reviewing a release when you are not directly involved as a developer is **really hard**. As an IPMC member yourself, have you ever reviewed a release for podling you were not involved with? Yes. In fact, I spent time reviewing AOO incubator releases. Don't recall if I actually voted on one; probably not, since there were so many other active IPMC members all over that. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. -1 That's at odds with basic, ASF-wide rules for voting on releases. I know; but it got everyone's attention, didn't it. :) What I'd more seriously like to propose is that we come up with a tool that slurps the general@ archives and pings the list once a week with a reminder about outstanding votes. I'll happily invest my copious free time towards that, if the IPMC agrees such a tool would be useful. -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases
Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails an issue summary once a week? Ross Gardler wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 14:55:05 +: That tool would be useful in more places than the incubator. Great idea. I'm looking forward to seeing it ;-) Sent from my tablet On Dec 1, 2012 2:51 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release tarball from a podling. Reviewing a release when you are not directly involved as a developer is **really hard**. As an IPMC member yourself, have you ever reviewed a release for podling you were not involved with? Yes. In fact, I spent time reviewing AOO incubator releases. Don't recall if I actually voted on one; probably not, since there were so many other active IPMC members all over that. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. -1 That's at odds with basic, ASF-wide rules for voting on releases. I know; but it got everyone's attention, didn't it. :) What I'd more seriously like to propose is that we come up with a tool that slurps the general@ archives and pings the list once a week with a reminder about outstanding votes. I'll happily invest my copious free time towards that, if the IPMC agrees such a tool would be useful. -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: I know; but it got everyone's attention, didn't it. :) Lesson learned. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Fwd: Advice on inviting Apache insight to NSF SI2 meeting?
Anyone able to help the NSF out at a meeting in DC in Jan? See below for more info. On a personal note I've noticed an increased, and genuine, interest in how to improve the impact of publicly funded research outputs from the NSF in the last couple of years. We are even seeing important components turning up in the Incubator. I hope we can send someone able to help them understand how we do things around here. It's your (US) tax dollars going into this work. I'd normally do this myself but I have a clash on these dates. Let me know privately if you are interested and I'll help you/them figure out who the best fit is. Ross Sent from my tablet -- Forwarded message -- From: James Howison jhowi...@ischool.utexas.edu Date: Nov 30, 2012 9:31 PM Subject: Advice on inviting Apache insight to NSF SI2 meeting? To: Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org Hi Ross, I'm organizing a panel at an upcoming meeting for the PIs of all the projects funded by the SI2 funding program at the NSF (SI2, or SI^2, is the main Scientific Software funding program at the moment). The panel is going to focus on Software Impact, and I'd like to have someone who can inject an understanding of the importance of community, including Incubator considerations such as non-salaried developers etc. We're also considering adopting the DOAP way of describing the projects and their infrastructure as a way of helping projects and the program overall catalogue their activities. The meeting is in DC in January Jan 17 and half-day 18th. Does anyone from Apache come to mind (including yourself) that would be relevant either with experience in Incubation, or from the DOAP/catalogue. Do you think your experience with SIMAL would be relevant here, might you be interested? Best regards, James Howison -- James Howison Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
December reporting
I'm trying to figure out how my predecessors set up the templates on the pages; for now there's an empty page there for people to fill in. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
December reporting: All Mentors Please Sign Off and general note
First of several reminders: For podlings reporting in December, we'd like *all* mentors to sign off on the reports. I hope to use this to get a clearer picture of where we have mentor weaknesses. General note: if you are a PPMC member or mentor, and you feel that your community is undersupplied with Mentor attention (e.g., you have trouble getting votes for releases), please start a thread here. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012
I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. But they are listed here: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami What do I need to fix to get these reminders? I just know the old wiki-styled process On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them to supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 5th). Please recall that the Incubator report is due Wed, Dec 12th. Allura Developers allura-...@incubator.apache.org Bloodhound Developers bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org Blur Developers blur-...@incubator.apache.org cTAKES Developers ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Drill Developersdrill-...@incubator.apache.org Etch Developers etch-...@incubator.apache.org Flex Developers flex-...@incubator.apache.org Hadoop Development Tools Developers general@incubator.apache.org HCatalog Developers hcatalog-...@incubator.apache.org Kalumet Developers kalumet-...@incubator.apache.org Openmeetings Developers openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org S4 Developers s4-...@incubator.apache.org Wave Developers wave-...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012
I'm embarassed to admit that I don't know either. http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt looks right, what else needs to be done? On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. But they are listed here: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami What do I need to fix to get these reminders? I just know the old wiki-styled process On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them to supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 5th). Please recall that the Incubator report is due Wed, Dec 12th. Allura Developers allura-...@incubator.apache.org Bloodhound Developers bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org Blur Developers blur-...@incubator.apache.org cTAKES Developers ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Drill Developersdrill-...@incubator.apache.org Etch Developers etch-...@incubator.apache.org Flex Developers flex-...@incubator.apache.org Hadoop Development Tools Developers general@incubator.apache.org HCatalog Developers hcatalog-...@incubator.apache.org Kalumet Developers kalumet-...@incubator.apache.org Openmeetings Developers openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org S4 Developers s4-...@incubator.apache.org Wave Developers wave-...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012
Hmm maybe it is this file? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/report_due_3.txt Onami which is listed there does have a wrong dev@ address. Not sure why Marvin didn't report it On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm embarassed to admit that I don't know either. http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt looks right, what else needs to be done? On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. But they are listed here: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami What do I need to fix to get these reminders? I just know the old wiki-styled process On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them to supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 5th). Please recall that the Incubator report is due Wed, Dec 12th. Allura Developers allura-...@incubator.apache.org Bloodhound Developers bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org Blur Developers blur-...@incubator.apache.org cTAKES Developers ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Drill Developersdrill-...@incubator.apache.org Etch Developers etch-...@incubator.apache.org Flex Developers flex-...@incubator.apache.org Hadoop Development Tools Developers general@incubator.apache.org HCatalog Developers hcatalog-...@incubator.apache.org Kalumet Developers kalumet-...@incubator.apache.org Openmeetings Developers openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org S4 Developers s4-...@incubator.apache.org Wave Developers wave-...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012
Can you point to some maintenance instructions for all of this? On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm maybe it is this file? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/report_due_3.txt Onami which is listed there does have a wrong dev@ address. Not sure why Marvin didn't report it On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm embarassed to admit that I don't know either. http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt looks right, what else needs to be done? On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. But they are listed here: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami What do I need to fix to get these reminders? I just know the old wiki-styled process On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them to supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 5th). Please recall that the Incubator report is due Wed, Dec 12th. Allura Developers allura-...@incubator.apache.org Bloodhound Developers bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org Blur Developers blur-...@incubator.apache.org cTAKES Developers ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Drill Developersdrill-...@incubator.apache.org Etch Developers etch-...@incubator.apache.org Flex Developers flex-...@incubator.apache.org Hadoop Development Tools Developers general@incubator.apache.org HCatalog Developers hcatalog-...@incubator.apache.org Kalumet Developers kalumet-...@incubator.apache.org Openmeetings Developers openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org S4 Developers s4-...@incubator.apache.org Wave Developers wave-...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Your Bloodhound is calling you
Hyrum and Greg, The bloodhound project is trying to make a release. You gents are listed as mentors. Could you please find the time to check out and vote appropriately on their release? --benson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012
Sorry, I have seen this file for the first time. I am not aware of how it is cared. I just ask myself one thing: why isn't this podling schedule generated out of podling.xml? Hopefully some others can help On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Can you point to some maintenance instructions for all of this? On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm maybe it is this file? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/report_due_3.txt Onami which is listed there does have a wrong dev@ address. Not sure why Marvin didn't report it On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm embarassed to admit that I don't know either. http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt looks right, what else needs to be done? On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. But they are listed here: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami What do I need to fix to get these reminders? I just know the old wiki-styled process On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them to supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 5th). Please recall that the Incubator report is due Wed, Dec 12th. Allura Developers allura-...@incubator.apache.org Bloodhound Developers bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org Blur Developers blur-...@incubator.apache.org cTAKES Developers ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Drill Developersdrill-...@incubator.apache.org Etch Developers etch-...@incubator.apache.org Flex Developers flex-...@incubator.apache.org Hadoop Development Tools Developers general@incubator.apache.org HCatalog Developers hcatalog-...@incubator.apache.org Kalumet Developers kalumet-...@incubator.apache.org Openmeetings Developers openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org S4 Developers s4-...@incubator.apache.org Wave Developers wave-...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012
2012/12/1 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. But they are listed here: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami Helix too. What do I need to fix to get these reminders? I just know the old wiki-styled process On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them to supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 5th). Please recall that the Incubator report is due Wed, Dec 12th. Allura Developers allura-...@incubator.apache.org Bloodhound Developers bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org Blur Developers blur-...@incubator.apache.org cTAKES Developers ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Drill Developersdrill-...@incubator.apache.org Etch Developers etch-...@incubator.apache.org Flex Developers flex-...@incubator.apache.org Hadoop Development Tools Developers general@incubator.apache.org HCatalog Developers hcatalog-...@incubator.apache.org Kalumet Developers kalumet-...@incubator.apache.org Openmeetings Developers openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org S4 Developers s4-...@incubator.apache.org Wave Developers wave-...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases
On 01.12.2012 16:00, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails an issue summary once a week? That's certainly one thing I considered. -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Your Bloodhound is calling you
Well aware, thank you. On Dec 1, 2012 12:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Hyrum and Greg, The bloodhound project is trying to make a release. You gents are listed as mentors. Could you please find the time to check out and vote appropriately on their release? --benson
Re: Incubator report reminders sent for Dec 2012
Benson Margulies wrote: Can you point to some maintenance instructions for all of this? Sorry i do not have time to find them right now, but it has been explained to this list on various occasions so should be in the archives. We do need to have better docs, so that we do not all forget, me included. The main data file is now content/podlings.xml Clutch parses that, gets other hints from each project status page, checks that the podling's mail lists are established and operating, then generates the report lists of dev addresses. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#notes http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#data I think that i can see the glitch reported today. Recently the setup of new projects mail lists infra procedure changed. I immediately followed up an tweaked Clutch to handle that. However it seems that the writing of the report_due_[1-3].txt data files (which 'marvin' uses to send the reminders) is not quite right. Sorry no time to fix right now. See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1400367 The reporting web page lists are also generated from content/podlings.xml each time that data file changes. The CMS triggers and its Ant build uses some XSL in the top level of the incubator SVN. Some other stuff that we need to make more obvious: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt -David On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm maybe it is this file? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/report_due_3.txt Onami which is listed there does have a wrong dev@ address. Not sure why Marvin didn't report it On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm embarassed to admit that I don't know either. http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt looks right, what else needs to be done? On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I miss Onami and Ripple from the reminders. But they are listed here: http://incubator.apache.org/report-next-month.html#onami What do I need to fix to get these reminders? I just know the old wiki-styled process On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote: The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. I have just sent reminder emails to the below addresses, requesting them to supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date (Wed, Dec 5th). Please recall that the Incubator report is due Wed, Dec 12th. Allura Developers allura-...@incubator.apache.org Bloodhound Developers bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org Blur Developers blur-...@incubator.apache.org cTAKES Developers ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org Drill Developersdrill-...@incubator.apache.org Etch Developers etch-...@incubator.apache.org Flex Developers flex-...@incubator.apache.org Hadoop Development Tools Developers general@incubator.apache.org HCatalog Developers hcatalog-...@incubator.apache.org Kalumet Developers kalumet-...@incubator.apache.org Openmeetings Developers openmeetings-...@incubator.apache.org S4 Developers s4-...@incubator.apache.org Wave Developers wave-...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating)
-Original Message- From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2012 6:41 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating) On 01.12.2012 08:37, Luciano Resende wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Joachim Dreimann joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com wrote: Hi, I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. The result of the vote is summarised here: http://markmail.org/thread/owksv6lbcs6zq7th The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS can be found here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/ The release itself is created from: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/tags/0.3- incubating/ (r1412891) Issues identified to be fixed for the next release are listed here: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/273 https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/274 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.3 [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain) Cheers, Joe -- Joe Dreimann UX Designer | WANdisco http://www.wandisco.com/ License and notice seems fine and couple of the issues found during the vote on the dev list dosen't seem blocking. +1 binding. Thank you, Luciano. We now have two binding IPMC votes, one from a mentor, and one from another IPMC member who was kind enough to be provoked into action by said mentor's troll. Any other takers? :) +1 Binding LGTM Gav... -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: December reporting: All Mentors Please Sign Off and general note
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: First of several reminders: For podlings reporting in December, we'd like *all* mentors to sign off on the reports. I hope to use this to get a clearer picture of where we have mentor weaknesses. General note: if you are a PPMC member or mentor, and you feel that your community is undersupplied with Mentor attention (e.g., you have trouble getting votes for releases), please start a thread here. The report is meant to communicate this sort of health info... --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Graduate OpenMeetings from Incubator
Dear Incubation members, During incubation, OpenMeetings has : * Produced 1 Release * Added 5 new Committer/PPMC members and shows constant community activities * Cleared IP on all code * Developed Roadmap(s) for the next major and minor releases in a community process and started working on that Given these accomplishments, I propose that we submit the following graduation resolution to the incubator PMC. We organized already a community vote: http://markmail.org/thread/wnxvkvukdqgdddpn The vote received: 1x +1 Yegor IPMC 5x +1 solomax, aaf, sebawagner, greenes PMC 1x +1 Irina Please VOTE over the next 72 hours on the resolution below: [ ] +1 Graduate OpenMeetings from the Incubator per the resolution below. [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't graduate OpenMeetings from the Incubator because: = Charter here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENMEETINGS/Draft+Charter and copied below: X. Establish the Apache OpenMeetings Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to OpenMeetings Web-Conferencing tool. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache OpenMeetings Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenMeetings Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to the OpenMeetings Web-Conferencing tool; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache OpenMeetings be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache OpenMeetings Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache OpenMeetings Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenMeetings Project: * Alexei Fedotova...@apache.org * Sebastian Wagner sebawag...@apache.org * Maxim Solodovnik solo...@apache.org * Oliver Becherer smoe...@apache.org * Rodion Volkovrc...@apache.org * Eugen Schwert eschw...@apache.org * German Grekhovggrek...@apache.org * Timur Tleukenov ti...@apache.org * Alvaro Bustos Ruiz al...@apache.org * George Kirkham gkirk...@apache.org * Stephen Cotthammegatroni...@apache.org * Sascha Xander sxan...@apache.org * Evgeny Rovinskyrovin...@apache.org NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Sebastian Wagner be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache OpenMeetings, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache OpenMeetings PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache OpenMeetings Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache OpenMeetings Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenMeetings podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator OpenMeetings podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged.
