Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: > > The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be >> separate files for each hash type. >> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. >> > > In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format > that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for > tamper detection is in fact wrong. [So why are those two in the mds file?!] But that's not the primary intention of the hashes anyway; hashes are intended for checking that a download has succeeded. Proper tamper detection requires signatures. > -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Apache Curator into the Incubator
Hello, This VOTE has PASSED. There were no +0s or -1s. The +1s were: Chris Mattmann* Luciano Resende* Andrew Purtell Ioannis Canellos Ioan Eugen Stan Enis Söztutar* Mahadev Konar* Patrick Hunt* Eric Charles * - indicates IPMC I'll work with Patrick to get the details rolling. Thanks to everyone. -Jordan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Bloodhound from Incubator
> -Original Message- > From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2013 11:02 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Bloodhound from Incubator > > Hi, > > Following the community graduation vote result announcement on the > bloodhound-dev@i.a.o mailing list [1] and the conclusion of the podling > name search [2], I would like to invite Apache Incubator to vote on > recommending Apache Bloodhound for graduation. > > Please vote: > [ X ] +1 Graduate Apache Bloodhound podling from Apache Incubator (binding) Gav... [ ] +0 > Indifferent to the graduation status of Apache Bloodhound podling [ ] -1 > Reject graduation of Apache Bloodhound podling from Apache Incubator > because ... > > The vote will run for at least 72 hours. The proposed graduation resolution is > below. > > Cheers, > Gary > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/k6q7l4gvdtuhu6z2 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-22 > > --- > X. Establish the Apache Bloodhound Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the > Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a > Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance > of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related > to a software development collaboration tool, including issue tracking, wiki > and repository browsing. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee > (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Bloodhound Project", be and hereby is > established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Bloodhound Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to a > software development collaboration tool, including issue tracking, wiki and > repository browsing; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Bloodhound" be and > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of > the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Bloodhound Project, and to > have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope > of responsibility of the Apache Bloodhound Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Bloodhound > Project: > > * Mat Booth > * Matevž Bradač > * John Chambers > * Branko Čibej > * Joachim Dreimann > * Andrej Golcov > * Peter Koželj > * Gary Martin > * Gavin McDonald > * Ryan Ollos > * Mark Poole > * Greg Stein > * Hyrum K. Wright > * Jure Žitnik > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gary Martin be appointed > to the office of Vice President, Apache Bloodhound, to serve in accordance > with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of > the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or > disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Bloodhound PMC be and hereby is tasked > with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open > development and increased participation in the Apache Bloodhound Project; > and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Bloodhound Project be and hereby is tasked > with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Bloodhound > podling; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator > Bloodhound podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are > hereafter discharged. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: > > The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be >> separate files for each hash type. >> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. >> > > In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format > that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for > tamper detection is in fact wrong. Is there any particular reason to introduce this type of inconsistency? At least in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined bundle for the checksums. This makes the job of the tools that automatically download apache tarballs and ingest them into a build pipeline more complicated without much obvious benefit. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be > separate files for each hash type. > Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. > In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for tamper detection is in fact wrong. -- Owen
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Onami Parent 3-incubating
Hi all, more than 72h have passed and we got an additional binding vote from Tommaso Teofili, with the total of 4 binding votes the current thread can be considered concluded and passes with following resolution: four +1 binding votes from following IPMC members: - Mohammad Nour El-Din - Olivier Lamy - Christian Grobmeier - Tommaso Teofili no other votes have been casted. I am going to promote the staging artifacts. Thanks everybody for taking part to the vote! All the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Good morning incubator, > > the Apache Onami PPMC has voted Apache Onami Parent 3-incubating, and > already got 3 IPMC binding votes from IPMC members: > > - Mohammad Nour El-Din (*) > - Olivier Lamy (*) > - Christian Grobmeier (*) > > We solved 5 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314120&version=12323948 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=component%20%3D%20parent%20AND%20project%20%3D%20ONAMI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > SVN source tag > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.parent-3-incubating/ > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-322/ > > Release artifact: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-322/org/apache/onami/org.apache.onami.parent/3-incubating/org.apache.onami.parent-3-incubating-source-release.zip > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and closes ~ on March 10th at > 7:30pm GMT. > > Many thanks in advance, all the best, > -Simo > > [ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!! > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate cTAKES from Incubator
More than 72 hours has passed and the vote has passed with the following votes: +1 Chris Mattmann (binding) +1 Jukka Zitting (binding) +1 Tommaso Teofili (binding) I will send an email to the Board asking them to include the resolution in the agenda for the next Board meeting. Thanks everyone! --Pei - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Looking for a volunteer to finalize the March report
Thanks! On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin wrote: > On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on > > Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it > contains > > at that moment. > > > I can do it. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies > > >wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncertain > > > networking and state of jet lag. > > > > > > Would someone else be willing to tie off the report and deliver it to > the > > > board's doorstep? > > > > > > --benson > > > > > > > > >
RE: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Apache Incubator
Christian, your point regarding number of active contributors is valid and this is in deed also something that we feel is a risk to the project. I would say though that Human Inference is committed to continue the effort even if I should personally stop committing to it - reason being that the software stack we have here is highly dependent on MetaModel. Right now we are simply in a situation where I am the key go-to-guy when there's MetaModel related work involved. Often we pair program on these tasks, but commit through my account. The other side of the story is that we have several testers that contribute a lot in terms of bug reports and so on. But because we're a closed company these reports are typically going first through our internal bugtracker and then into the trac system. At that point in time it will typically be me that enters the trac ticket. This is obviously a style of closedness that won't work in an Apache situation, and we need to adapt to that. But I also believe that we can manage that transition during incubation. As for the "potential" contributors - one have indicated that it is important to him that we move MetaModel out of the corporate setting for him to sign a contributors agreement. The other (Sameer) actually just told me that he would want to contribute anyways, but that the incubation would be an additional incentive, because of Apache's brand value. I don't think any of us wants a @apache.org email though! :) Hope that sheds a bit more light on the matter. And thanks for questioning this, it gives us opportunity to explain things! -Original Message- From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com] Sent: 11. marts 2013 11:43 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Apache Incubator I still think this is a nice project and it might fit right into the ASF. Currently I am out of time, so I cannot champion this proposal nor can I be the most active mentor. Unfortunately it seems nobody else in the IPMC has an interest in helping this proposal. Looking at: http://eobjects.org/trac/timeline It seems MetaModel is more or less a single-man with a little support from two other devs. With less interest from the Incubator and a small dev community I am not sure how this project will develop here. If Kasper stops to commit, the project is dead. Two contributors are listed as "have an interest to commit if accepted to the ASF". Why didn't they contribute before? It reads a bit like they want to have an @apache.org e-mail address than a real interest in the project. Hopefully other IPMC'lers find some time to comment here too. On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Kasper Sørensen wrote: > Just for reference, I'd add to Sameer's mail that the proposal is here: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaModelProposal > > We would very much appreciate if one or more apache champions will help us to > get further in the process. > > Kasper > > -Original Message- > From: sameer arora [mailto:sameer11...@gmail.com] > Sent: 10. marts 2013 05:50 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Apache Incubator > > Hi, > > I have been working on Metamodel as a developer for the last 1.5 years.We are > also working on adding Hbase support to Metamodel to cater the needs of today. > > It would be great to see Metamodel accepted at Apache Incubator, surely the > efforts from us would gain some momentum. > > Sameer > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Looking for a volunteer to finalize the March report
On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote: > If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on > Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it contains > at that moment. I can do it. > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies > > >wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncertain > > networking and state of jet lag. > > > > Would someone else be willing to tie off the report and deliver it to the > > board's doorstep? > > > > --benson > > > > >
Re: Looking for a volunteer to finalize the March report
If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it contains at that moment. On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Folks, > > I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncertain > networking and state of jet lag. > > Would someone else be willing to tie off the report and deliver it to the > board's doorstep? > > --benson > >
Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Apache Incubator
I still think this is a nice project and it might fit right into the ASF. Currently I am out of time, so I cannot champion this proposal nor can I be the most active mentor. Unfortunately it seems nobody else in the IPMC has an interest in helping this proposal. Looking at: http://eobjects.org/trac/timeline It seems MetaModel is more or less a single-man with a little support from two other devs. With less interest from the Incubator and a small dev community I am not sure how this project will develop here. If Kasper stops to commit, the project is dead. Two contributors are listed as "have an interest to commit if accepted to the ASF". Why didn't they contribute before? It reads a bit like they want to have an @apache.org e-mail address than a real interest in the project. Hopefully other IPMC'lers find some time to comment here too. On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Kasper Sørensen wrote: > Just for reference, I'd add to Sameer's mail that the proposal is here: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaModelProposal > > We would very much appreciate if one or more apache champions will help us to > get further in the process. > > Kasper > > -Original Message- > From: sameer arora [mailto:sameer11...@gmail.com] > Sent: 10. marts 2013 05:50 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Apache Incubator > > Hi, > > I have been working on Metamodel as a developer for the last 1.5 years.We are > also working on adding Hbase support to Metamodel to cater the needs of today. > > It would be great to see Metamodel accepted at Apache Incubator, surely the > efforts from us would gain some momentum. > > Sameer > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Apache Incubator
Just for reference, I'd add to Sameer's mail that the proposal is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaModelProposal We would very much appreciate if one or more apache champions will help us to get further in the process. Kasper -Original Message- From: sameer arora [mailto:sameer11...@gmail.com] Sent: 10. marts 2013 05:50 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Apache Incubator Hi, I have been working on Metamodel as a developer for the last 1.5 years.We are also working on adding Hbase support to Metamodel to cater the needs of today. It would be great to see Metamodel accepted at Apache Incubator, surely the efforts from us would gain some momentum. Sameer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
