[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
Hi All, this vote passed with: Three +1 binding votes from Justin Mclean, Mark Struberg and Romain Manni-Bucau. There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thanks Kind regards Hendrik On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating. This will be the second incubator release for Johnzon. The project vote on the dev list is here: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6 Vote result: 3 binding +1 votes 2 non-binding +1 votes No -1 votes Git commit for the release is [56c9789] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001 Source releases (zip/tar.gz): http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz Site is here: http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/ PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this packge [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator
+1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Joey Echeverria joe...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) Great proposal! On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 16:22 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 - binding On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive conversation, so I offer this vote. Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ... Here is my [+1] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
+1 Le mar. 18 nov. 2014 18:27, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com a écrit : On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like johnzon has a dependency on a dual licensed CDDL/GPL library, should that be in the notice file perhaps? That wouldn't apply to the official source release, assuming the CDDL/GPL library is not bundled with the source artifacts. (It shouldn't be!) Optionally we can get into vetting the licensing documentation of the convenience binary, but the VOTE underway applies only to the source. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Joining IPMC
IPMC, Josh has been an Accumulo committer for 2 years and is a contributor to a number of other ASF projects. He has shown responsibility and has taken an interest in ASF practices and in communicating these to others. As a member of the Slider PPMC, Josh has learned about the incubator process. I think he would be a good mentor, and this would be a great way to get him more involved at ASF. I would be happy to mentor his mentoring of the potential new NiFi podling. Note: Josh and I work for the same company. Billie PS: Sorry if anyone receives this twice -- I resent because I was having difficulties sending from gmail. On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Josh Elser els...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request the privilege of joining the IPMC. Let me know if there's anything you'd like to know about me -- I'm happy to give a brief background about myself if desired. - Josh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Initial Proposal for New Apache Project Welcoming New applicants !!
Hi Folks, The very few of us involved with the Apache Philae project agree that this development be done as part of the Apache James project it self as originally suggested by Jan Feel free now to use the Philae name to any other Apache project... Cheers Brian Brian Antao, Ph.D. 235B Cowbridge Road East, Canton, Cardiff CF11 9AL, UK http://uk.linkedin.com/in/brianantao On 7 November 2014 at 10:02, Brian Antao brianantaor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ya Apache Folks, I would like to get your initial reactions to a New Project that I would like to propose -- The Apache Email Engine Concept -- Fully Automated Email Solution that the default version builds on top of the Apache James Email Server -- The Functionality of the Engine -- 1. auto processing without the need of manual supervision of all send mail and receive mail requests. 2. Support of Automated Email Rules to Flag off Email Etiquette Violators. 3. Will link by default to the Apache James Email Server, initially ... but later versions will support Plug In of different other servers similar to James. 4. So the Complete Email Engine Solution with the Coupled James Email Server can be Hosted on Cloud Servers or actual Physical Servers. 5. Cloud as well as Real Storage facilities for all Email Accounts. 6. Easy Links to WebMail and other direct POP/IMAP Clients. 7. Any other Suggestions Welcome ! All Volunters for different positions to get going on the Formal Proposal Submission to the Incubator Committee are required !! Cheers, --Brian Antao. Brian Antao, Ph.D. 235B Cowbridge Road East, Canton, Cardiff CF11 9AL, UK http://uk.linkedin.com/in/brianantao
Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator
Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we want the proposal to be final before sending the vote. John On Sat Nov 22 2014 at 11:09:52 AM Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Joey Echeverria joe...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) Great proposal! On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 16:22 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 - binding On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive conversation, so I offer this vote. Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ... Here is my [+1] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator
John, I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing so now though to avoid any confusion. Thanks Joe On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we want the proposal to be final before sending the vote. John On Sat Nov 22 2014 at 11:09:52 AM Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Joey Echeverria joe...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) Great proposal! On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 16:22 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 - binding On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive conversation, so I offer this vote. Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ... Here is my [+1] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator
+1 (binding) have fun jan i On 22 November 2014 at 22:55, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: John, I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing so now though to avoid any confusion. Thanks Joe On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we want the proposal to be final before sending the vote. John On Sat Nov 22 2014 at 11:09:52 AM Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Joey Echeverria joe...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) Great proposal! On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 16:22 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 - binding On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and positive conversation, so I offer this vote. Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ... Here is my [+1] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:42 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we want the proposal to be final before sending the vote. This is why the vote includes the proposal text or a specific wiki revision. I believe Benson sent the proposal text for the vote as a follow up to the original call. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: John, I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing so now though to avoid any confusion. Joe, usually when there are things to change that don't impact the vote itself, they're noted by the champion as follow ons and then taken care of after the vote in the podling docs rather than the proposal. Easy mistake, not a big deal. -- Sean
How do reporting groups get assigned?
How do reporting groups get assigned to podlings? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?
Hi all, I was wondering what everyone thought about the current shepherd program? It seems like we have some idle shepherds, who maybe don't have the bandwidth to help out all the time. What would everyone thing if we marked idle shepherds w/ max_podlings = 0 so that they don't get assigned? With that said, are there any folks out in the community who might be interested in taking a shot at being shepherds? It's a great way to get some exposure to the incubator and its processes. John
Re: How do reporting groups get assigned?
I always assumed that it was based on the month the podling joins. Since there are 3 reporting groups, the decision on who to report is on the mod of the current month number against 3, so I figured M % 3 = reporting group, except 3 replaces 0. But that's only my guess as none of the guides describe how to choose it. But this makes it so that the podling has to present 4 straight reports after entering incubation. John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: How do reporting groups get assigned to podlings? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?
I just signed up few weeks ago and looking to help out when assigned. Tim On Nov 22, 2014, at 4:56 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I was wondering what everyone thought about the current shepherd program? It seems like we have some idle shepherds, who maybe don't have the bandwidth to help out all the time. What would everyone thing if we marked idle shepherds w/ max_podlings = 0 so that they don't get assigned? With that said, are there any folks out in the community who might be interested in taking a shot at being shepherds? It's a great way to get some exposure to the incubator and its processes. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: How do reporting groups get assigned?
Leveling. Which group has the fewest? Boom. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I always assumed that it was based on the month the podling joins. Since there are 3 reporting groups, the decision on who to report is on the mod of the current month number against 3, so I figured M % 3 = reporting group, except 3 replaces 0. But that's only my guess as none of the guides describe how to choose it. But this makes it so that the podling has to present 4 straight reports after entering incubation. John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: How do reporting groups get assigned to podlings? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: How do reporting groups get assigned?
When a podling joins the incubator it reports monthly for the first three months. When this period ends they go to quarterly. Hence the month of entry determines the report group. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Greg Steinmailto:gst...@gmail.com Sent: 11/22/2014 5:21 PM To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: How do reporting groups get assigned? Leveling. Which group has the fewest? Boom. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I always assumed that it was based on the month the podling joins. Since there are 3 reporting groups, the decision on who to report is on the mod of the current month number against 3, so I figured M % 3 = reporting group, except 3 replaces 0. But that's only my guess as none of the guides describe how to choose it. But this makes it so that the podling has to present 4 straight reports after entering incubation. John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: How do reporting groups get assigned to podlings? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] accept NiFi into the incubator
Ok, as long as there's no more editing going on, I'm +1. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:42 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Is it me or has the proposal changed since the vote went out? Ideally we want the proposal to be final before sending the vote. This is why the vote includes the proposal text or a specific wiki revision. I believe Benson sent the proposal text for the vote as a follow up to the original call. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote: John, I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing so now though to avoid any confusion. Joe, usually when there are things to change that don't impact the vote itself, they're noted by the champion as follow ons and then taken care of after the vote in the podling docs rather than the proposal. Easy mistake, not a big deal. -- Sean
Proposals - wiki required?
All, The current way the proposal page is written, the wiki for proposals is optional. I don't think this is the case any longer, since it looks like we request that all proposals get put there first. Does anyone mind if I rephrase the page to make it mandatory to use the wiki for proposals? John
Re: [DISCUSS] Rolling shepherds?
I'm still looking to my first podling report :) how does the limit usually get decided? Tim On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:32 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Nevermind, appears I'm blind. You're there already. :-) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:23 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Tim, Thanks! Looks like you were never added to shepherds.json. Are you in the incubator group already or not yet? If not yet, can you tell me your apache id and if you have any prefer to a podling limit? John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Timothy Chen tnac...@gmail.com wrote: I just signed up few weeks ago and looking to help out when assigned. Tim On Nov 22, 2014, at 4:56 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I was wondering what everyone thought about the current shepherd program? It seems like we have some idle shepherds, who maybe don't have the bandwidth to help out all the time. What would everyone thing if we marked idle shepherds w/ max_podlings = 0 so that they don't get assigned? With that said, are there any folks out in the community who might be interested in taking a shot at being shepherds? It's a great way to get some exposure to the incubator and its processes. John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: How do reporting groups get assigned?
If this is in fact the case, I'll update the page to indicate how they get chosen. Just to reconfirm. Reporting Group 1 = Podlings who are crated in January, April, July and October Reporting Group 2 = in February, May, August, November Reporting Group 3 = in March, June, September, December John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: When a podling joins the incubator it reports monthly for the first three months. When this period ends they go to quarterly. Hence the month of entry determines the report group. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Greg Steinmailto:gst...@gmail.com Sent: 11/22/2014 5:21 PM To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: How do reporting groups get assigned? Leveling. Which group has the fewest? Boom. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I always assumed that it was based on the month the podling joins. Since there are 3 reporting groups, the decision on who to report is on the mod of the current month number against 3, so I figured M % 3 = reporting group, except 3 replaces 0. But that's only my guess as none of the guides describe how to choose it. But this makes it so that the podling has to present 4 straight reports after entering incubation. John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: How do reporting groups get assigned to podlings? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Report Timeline Report Manager for December
All, I've published the December 2014 report to the wiki. Here's the timeline and shepherd assignment: December 2014 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2014 Wed December 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun December 07 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun December 07 -- Summary due by end of day Tue December 09 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed December 10 -- Report submitted to Board Wed December 17 -- Board meeting Alan D. Cabrera - Ignite Andrei Savu - Drill Andrei Savu - Johnzon Dave Fisher - NPanday John Ament - MRQL John Ament - log4cxx2 Justin Mclean - Tamaya Konstantin Boudnik - Argus Matthew Franklin - Brooklyn Raphael Bircher - Kalumet Raphael Bircher - Streams Roman Shaposhnik - Sentry Ross Gardler - Wave Suresh Marru - Falcon Suresh Marru - Lens Timothy Chen - Ripple Timothy Chen - Taverna I know this is a few days early, but considering we have a few holidays popping up I wanted to send it earlier than later. If we get any new podlings in the next few days we can add them to the report. I'm wondering if anyone's willing to help with some of the report manager responsibilities this month? To see some of the required steps, run this in the incubator site svn repo: ./report_runbook.py --apache-id your apache id --month 12 John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Wrong release name - Argus Ranger
Hi Argus, I was compiling the release list and noticed that yours wasn't named properly. /release/incubator/argus/0.4.0/ranger-0.4.0.tar.gz Per incubation requirements, it needs to be named -incubating - please see http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Can you fix this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Wrong release name - Argus Ranger
Ok, I had to dig into mail archives to figure out what's going on. Currently anything @argus.i.a.o is bouncing. Switching to the ranger mail alias to see if it goes through. John On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:22 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Argus, I was compiling the release list and noticed that yours wasn't named properly. /release/incubator/argus/0.4.0/ranger-0.4.0.tar.gz Per incubation requirements, it needs to be named -incubating - please see http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Can you fix this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
FIXED - Re: Wrong release name - Argus Ranger
Hi: Thanks for pointing out about Ranger release filenames. I have fixed the filename/directory-name as suggested in the email as follows: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/argus/0.4.0-incubating/ranger-0.4.0-incubating.tar.gz https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/argus/0.4.0-incubating/ranger-0.4.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/argus/0.4.0-incubating/ranger-0.4.0-incubating.tar.gz.mds Thanks, Selva- -- Forwarded message -- From: John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:22 PM Subject: Wrong release name - Argus Ranger To: d...@argus.incubator.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Hi Argus, I was compiling the release list and noticed that yours wasn't named properly. /release/incubator/argus/0.4.0/ranger-0.4.0.tar.gz Per incubation requirements, it needs to be named -incubating - please see http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Can you fix this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: Report Timeline Report Manager for December
On Nov 22, 2014, at 7:16 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I know this is a few days early, but considering we have a few holidays popping up I wanted to send it earlier than later. If we get any new podlings in the next few days we can add them to the report. I'm wondering if anyone's willing to help with some of the report manager responsibilities this month? To see some of the required steps, run this in the incubator site svn repo: ./report_runbook.py --apache-id your apache id --month 12 I’m willing to help. Ironically, you and I were running the same steps from the run book at the same time. ;) I finished off the bits for November. Thanks for generating December’s wiki template. Regards, Alan
