Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

[Steve Loughran]

> On 13 Nov 2015, at 22:19, Matei Zaharia  wrote:
> 
> One question about this from the Spark side: have you considered giving the 
> project a different name so that it doesn't sound like a Spark component? 
> Right now "Spark Kernel" may be confused with "Spark Core" and things like 
> that. I don't see a lot of Apache TLPs with related names, though maybe 
> there's nothing wrong with that.
> 

ASF projects are allowed to, it just creates confusion about where support 
calls go. 

Certainly, if it is outside the ASF, then its an infringement of the ASF 
trademarks on Apache(tm) Spark(r). So from a trademark perspective alone, 
submitting to the ASF incubator may avoid having to rename the project. Given 
how java source usually ends up including product names in the packaging 
hierarchy, this can only be welcomed by the team

> In terms of whether to put this in Apache Spark proper, we can have a 
> discussion about it later, but my feeling is that it's not necessary. One 
> reason is that this only uses public APIs, and another is that there are also 
> other notebook interfaces over Spark (e.g. Zeppelin).
> 
> Matei
> 


+1 for keeping it separate, because it can have its own release schedule, and 
it is designed to be loosely coupled through those APIs,


Regarding the proposal, I do think the Kernel is architecturally interesting, 
especially the ability to register new event handlers running in-cluster.

However, it's requirement to be 100% compatible with Jupyter means that is must 
use zeroMQ as a transport, —and zeromq.jar is LPGL. 

And the ASF, for better or worse, has a policy of: no mandatory dependencies on 
LGPL artifacts

 http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html

with the most recent discussion on the topic being : 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-192

I see that 0MQ are talking about adopting the MPL license: 
http://zeromq.org/area:licensing ; I think getting zeromq.jar licensed as MPL 
is going to have be a checklist item on being able to release ASF approved 
artifacts, hence getting out of incubation.

If the project does get into incubation, one option that the spark team has is 
that of becoming the sponsoring project, rather than the incubator PMC. This 
gives the PMC there the responsibility for supervising the project, and should 
help foster a closer relationship between the groups

-Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating (RC3)

[Henry Saputra]

+1 (binding)

Forwarding from dev list



On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:47 AM, moon soo Lee  wrote:
> Hi forks,
>
> Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
> as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
>
> Vote on dev list:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCALf24sboheQdok1BRX1p5pT-mwY6waOfs490xiPAhT-QNCCAHg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Result of vote on dev list:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCALf24sZAbn0ZVtT_SSdDSpj7vSrCjpd0izq_g_ex9MJF2VALUw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> The commit id is e4743e71d2421f5b6950f9e0f346f07bb84f1671 :
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=e4743e71d2421f5b6950f9e0f346f07bb84f1671
>
> This corresponds to the tag: v0.5.5 :
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.5.5
>
> The release archives (tgz), signature, and checksums are here
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zeppelin/0.5.5-incubating-rc3/
>
> The release candidate consists of the following source distribution archive
> zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating.tgz
>
> In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided
> for user convenience at the same location
> zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all.tgz
>
>
> The maven artifacts are here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezeppelin-1003
>
> You can find the KEYS file here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zeppelin/KEYS
>
> Release notes available at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316221=12333531
>
>
> Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 17/Nov PDT).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Best regards,

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.2.0-incubating (RC2)

[Pramod Immaneni]

+1

Carrying vote over from dev list.

Thanks

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Amol Kekre  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I too am carrying over vote from dev. Did my testing too.
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Carry over vote from dev list, didi all of the usual checks.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating (RC3)

[moon soo Lee]

We're addressing issues (excluding DEPENDENCIES from rat, add missing
Apache Header) in

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-423
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-422

Definitely will be fixed in the next release.
Thanks for verifying.

Best,
moon

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:32 PM Henry Saputra 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Forwarding from dev list
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:47 AM, moon soo Lee  wrote:
> > Hi forks,
> >
> > Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
> > as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
> >
> > Vote on dev list:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCALf24sboheQdok1BRX1p5pT-mwY6waOfs490xiPAhT-QNCCAHg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Result of vote on dev list:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCALf24sZAbn0ZVtT_SSdDSpj7vSrCjpd0izq_g_ex9MJF2VALUw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The commit id is e4743e71d2421f5b6950f9e0f346f07bb84f1671 :
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=e4743e71d2421f5b6950f9e0f346f07bb84f1671
> >
> > This corresponds to the tag: v0.5.5 :
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.5.5
> >
> > The release archives (tgz), signature, and checksums are here
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zeppelin/0.5.5-incubating-rc3/
> >
> > The release candidate consists of the following source distribution
> archive
> > zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating.tgz
> >
> > In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are
> provided
> > for user convenience at the same location
> > zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all.tgz
> >
> >
> > The maven artifacts are here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezeppelin-1003
> >
> > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zeppelin/KEYS
> >
> > Release notes available at
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316221=12333531
> >
> >
> > Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 17/Nov PDT).
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] 0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Best regards,
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate REEF

[Brian Cho]

Congrats, all :)

Has this been submitted to the board yet? It looks like Chris Mattmann's
name is still not completely right (there's an extra 's' now).

-Brian

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Markus Weimer  wrote:

> The vote[0] for Apache REEF to become a top-level project has passed
> with 21 (5 binding) +1 votes, and no 0 or -1 votes.
>
> The binding +1 votes were from:
>
>   * Jakob Homan
>   * Chris Douglas
>   * Ross Gardler
>   * Hitesh Shah
>   * Chriss Mattmann
>
> The non-binding +1 votes were from:
>
>   * Markus Weimer
>   * Brian Cho
>   * Byung-Gon Chun
>   * Andrew Chung
>   * Gyewon Lee
>   * Dongjoon Hyun
>   * Dhruv Mahajan
>   * John Yang
>   * Boris Shulman
>   * Jason Jeong
>   * Tae-Geon Um
>   * Beysim Sezgin
>   * Julia Wang
>   * Yingda Chen
>   * Geon Woo Kim
>   * Yunseong Lee
>
>
> Thank you everyone for taking the time to review and cast your vote.
>
> We will now prepare a resolution for the next Board meeting.
>
> Markus
>
>
> ---
> [0]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationipmcvote
>
> On 2015-11-09 13:14, Markus Weimer wrote:
> > This is the vote to decide if Apache REEF should graduate from
> > the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
> >
> > This proposal was discussed [0] and voted upon [1] by the REEF community
> > and has been discussed [2] on this list.
> >
> > This vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache REEF from the Incubator.
> > [ ] +0 Don't care.
> > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache REEF from the Incubator because ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > [0]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationdiscussion
> > [1]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationppmsvoteresult
> > [2]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationdiscussionongeneral
> >
> > 
> > X. Establish the Apache REEF Project
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> > open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> > public, related to application development on top of
> > resource managers.
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache REEF Project",
> > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > Foundation; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the Apache REEF Project be and hereby is
> > responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
> > framework for application development on top of resource
> > managers; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache REEF"
> > be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> > of the Apache REEF Project, and to have primary
> > responsibility for management of the projects within the scope
> > of responsibility of the Apache REEF Project; and be it
> > further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > Apache REEF Project Management Committee:
> >
> > * Markus Weimer 
> > * Byung-Gon Chun 
> > * Yunseong Lee 
> > * Brian Cho 
> > * Beysim Sezgin 
> > * Yingda Chen 
> > * Julia Wang 
> > * Andrew Chung 
> > * Youngseok Yang 
> > * Gyewon Lee 
> > * Taegeon Um 
> > * Joo Seong Jeong 
> > * Geon-Woo Kim 
> > * Mariia Mykhailova 
> > * Shravan M Narayanamurthy 
> > * Dongjoon Hyun 
> > * Sergiy Matusevych 
> > * Tyson Condie 
> > * Chris Mattmann 
> > * Chris Douglas 
> > * Boris Shulman 
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Markus Weimer be
> > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache REEF, to
> > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death,
> > resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until
> > a successor is appointed; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache REEF Project be and hereby
> > is 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate REEF

[Markus Weimer]

On 2015-11-14 07:57, Brian Cho wrote:

Has this been submitted to the board yet?


No. We have to figure out how to do that :-)


It looks like Chris Mattmann's name is still not completely right
(there's an extra 's' now).


Oh well. I fixed it in the resolution draft, but mangled it in the vote
list. Sorry, Chris!

Markus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating (RC3)

[moon soo Lee]

Hi forks,

Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.

Vote on dev list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCALf24sboheQdok1BRX1p5pT-mwY6waOfs490xiPAhT-QNCCAHg%40mail.gmail.com%3E

Result of vote on dev list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCALf24sZAbn0ZVtT_SSdDSpj7vSrCjpd0izq_g_ex9MJF2VALUw%40mail.gmail.com%3E

The commit id is e4743e71d2421f5b6950f9e0f346f07bb84f1671 :
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=e4743e71d2421f5b6950f9e0f346f07bb84f1671

This corresponds to the tag: v0.5.5 :
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.5.5

The release archives (tgz), signature, and checksums are here
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zeppelin/0.5.5-incubating-rc3/

The release candidate consists of the following source distribution archive
zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating.tgz

In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided
for user convenience at the same location
zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating-bin-all.tgz


The maven artifacts are here
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezeppelin-1003

You can find the KEYS file here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zeppelin/KEYS

Release notes available at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316221=12333531


Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 17/Nov PDT).

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Best regards,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating (RC3)

[Steve Loughran]

> On 14 Nov 2015, at 12:47, moon soo Lee  wrote:
> 
> Hi forks,
> 
> Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed
> as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release.
> 
> Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 5am 17/Nov PDT).
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Best regards,

+1 binding

downloaded source zip, checked against gpg signature, built zepplin then 
started the server via bin/zepplin.sh; verified it was up and running.


I do note my first build failed: 

[INFO] 
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 3.783 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2015-11-14T15:24:07+00:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 29M/451M
[INFO] 
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.11:check 
(verify.rat) on project zeppelin: Too many files with unapproved license: 1 See 
RAT report in: 
/Users/stevel/Downloads/zeppelin/zeppelin-0.5.5-incubating/target/rat.txt -> 
[Help 1]

the entry in question:

 !? DEPENDENCIES


I had to delete that file for the build to work. It needs to be excluded in 
from the RAT audit for future releases. 

-Steve

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating)

[Roman Shaposhnik]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Hayes
 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating).  This is the first release since the
> project began incubating!
>
> Proposal:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8BR_-8whhNYr6jUdXTrE2ZYZWwJEx2XvgHDt22SRyr55w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Results:
>
> 3 binding +1 votes
> No 0 votes
> No -1 votes
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8ARiFsxZnRbZ-QPp9y_%2B_2SDhA%3DT4UChH24kaqtLG-PMA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> You can download the release candidate RC1 here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mhayes/incubator-datafu-1.3.0-rc1/
>
> This has been signed with PGP key 01D3DE61, which is included in the
> repository's KEYS file.  This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
>
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x01D3DE61
>
> The release candidate has been tagged with release-1.3.0-rc1, which has
> been signed with the same key.  You can also checkout branch 1.3.0.  For
> repo checkout instructions, please see:
>
> http://datafu.incubator.apache.org/community/contributing.html
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 1.3.0:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DATAFU%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.3.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC%2C%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>
> For a summary of the changes, see:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-datafu/blob/master/changes.md
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

+1 (binding)

Nits:
   1. I'd like to see a code signing key associated with an ASF email
   in addition to gmail.com address.
   2. I'd like to see see bottom of LICENSE move to NOTICE

* checked sigs and hashes
* checked that the release corresponds to an repo tag
* LICENSE file looks OK, but I don't think other LICENSE notices
  belong there. They typically belong to... NOTICE ;-)
* the build works fine
* headers look fine (sans Jakob's comment)

Thanks,
Roman.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating)

[Ashutosh Chauhan]

+1 (binding)

Signatures & md5 matches. LICENSE & NOTICE looks good except for what Roman
& Jakob noted.

Thanks,
Ashutosh

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik 
wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Hayes
>  wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release
> > Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating).  This is the first release since the
> > project began incubating!
> >
> > Proposal:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8BR_-8whhNYr6jUdXTrE2ZYZWwJEx2XvgHDt22SRyr55w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Results:
> >
> > 3 binding +1 votes
> > No 0 votes
> > No -1 votes
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8ARiFsxZnRbZ-QPp9y_%2B_2SDhA%3DT4UChH24kaqtLG-PMA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > You can download the release candidate RC1 here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~mhayes/incubator-datafu-1.3.0-rc1/
> >
> > This has been signed with PGP key 01D3DE61, which is included in the
> > repository's KEYS file.  This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
> >
> > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x01D3DE61
> >
> > The release candidate has been tagged with release-1.3.0-rc1, which has
> > been signed with the same key.  You can also checkout branch 1.3.0.  For
> > repo checkout instructions, please see:
> >
> > http://datafu.incubator.apache.org/community/contributing.html
> >
> > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 1.3.0:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DATAFU%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.3.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC%2C%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> >
> > For a summary of the changes, see:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-datafu/blob/master/changes.md
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Nits:
>1. I'd like to see a code signing key associated with an ASF email
>in addition to gmail.com address.
>2. I'd like to see see bottom of LICENSE move to NOTICE
>
> * checked sigs and hashes
> * checked that the release corresponds to an repo tag
> * LICENSE file looks OK, but I don't think other LICENSE notices
>   belong there. They typically belong to... NOTICE ;-)
> * the build works fine
> * headers look fine (sans Jakob's comment)
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating)

[Matthew Hayes]

Thanks Jakob, Roman, and Ashutosh.  I've filed JIRAs for the issues you've
raised.  We can address them in the next minor source release.

-Matt

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Signatures & md5 matches. LICENSE & NOTICE looks good except for what Roman
> & Jakob noted.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik 
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Hayes
> >  wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> > release
> > > Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating).  This is the first release since the
> > > project began incubating!
> > >
> > > Proposal:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8BR_-8whhNYr6jUdXTrE2ZYZWwJEx2XvgHDt22SRyr55w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > Results:
> > >
> > > 3 binding +1 votes
> > > No 0 votes
> > > No -1 votes
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCAA4Vo8ARiFsxZnRbZ-QPp9y_%2B_2SDhA%3DT4UChH24kaqtLG-PMA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > You can download the release candidate RC1 here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~mhayes/incubator-datafu-1.3.0-rc1/
> > >
> > > This has been signed with PGP key 01D3DE61, which is included in the
> > > repository's KEYS file.  This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
> > >
> > > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x01D3DE61
> > >
> > > The release candidate has been tagged with release-1.3.0-rc1, which has
> > > been signed with the same key.  You can also checkout branch 1.3.0.
> For
> > > repo checkout instructions, please see:
> > >
> > > http://datafu.incubator.apache.org/community/contributing.html
> > >
> > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 1.3.0:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DATAFU%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.3.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC%2C%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > >
> > > For a summary of the changes, see:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-datafu/blob/master/changes.md
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Nits:
> >1. I'd like to see a code signing key associated with an ASF email
> >in addition to gmail.com address.
> >2. I'd like to see see bottom of LICENSE move to NOTICE
> >
> > * checked sigs and hashes
> > * checked that the release corresponds to an repo tag
> > * LICENSE file looks OK, but I don't think other LICENSE notices
> >   belong there. They typically belong to... NOTICE ;-)
> > * the build works fine
> > * headers look fine (sans Jakob's comment)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

[Rich Bowen]

On Nov 13, 2015 4:50 PM, "Branko Čibej"  wrote:
>
> On 10.11.2015 16:00, Pierre Smits wrote:
> > That is nice! Apache pages drawn up by a member of the Apache Software
> > Foundation with the input from many  (both ASF members and others) and
> > hosted/communicated through ASF means, and then saying that those 'are
not
> > Foundation'. And that by/through the fingers of a fellow board
member
> >
> > That doesn't help mitigating the confusion building.
>
> The document is not a Foundation standard. ComDev is no closer to being
> "the ASF" than, say, Bloodhound PMC.
>
> Whilst I do find this attempt at a maturity model an interesting
> experiment, I'm really, really uncomfortable with people pushing it as
> some sort of golden standard for podlings (and, worse, TLPs). It's a
> completely informal paper, yet I've already seen people cast doubts on
> podling graduation with the excuse that some criterion of the model
> wasn't met.

That's because the document codifies what I consider criteria for
graduation, not because I somehow think that the document itself is holy.
Ie, the document reflects me, not vice versa.

>
> That kind of argument is totally out of line. The IPMC may decide to use
> the model as a metric for podling compliance and so integrate it into
> the Incubator policy[1]. Unless and until that happens, any attempt to
> measure podlings against that bit of paper (other than for purely
> recreational purposes) is rude at best.

No. I can use whatever criteria I like to justify my vote on a podlings
graduation, if it's in line with asf philosophy. This document is,  and
accurately reflects the criteria I use when voting on a graduation. That
is, the document reflects me, not vice versa, as I said above.

It's very akin to the docs that circulate around member election time. They
are useful guidelines but nobody is compelled to adhere to any particular
one of them.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating (RC3)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 binding

For the source I checked:
- release names include incubating
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- Source files have Apache headers (except two - see below)
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source

Also checked LICENSE and NOTICE in binary which are rather comprehensive.

These files are missing an Apache header:
zeppelin-zengine/src/test/java/org/apache/zeppelin/notebook/NoteInterpreterLoaderTest.java
zeppelin-zengine/src/test/java/org/apache/zeppelin/notebook/repo/mock/VFSNotebookRepoMock.java

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.2.0-incubating (RC2)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

Carry over vote from dev list, didi all of the usual checks.

Thanks,
Justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.2.0-incubating (RC2)

[Amol Kekre]

+1 (non-binding)

I too am carrying over vote from dev. Did my testing too.

Thks
Amol

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Carry over vote from dev list, didi all of the usual checks.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 binding

I checked
- incubating in release name
- signature and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source

In the next release you may want to consider:
 - placing the release candidate in the correct place [1]
 - signing with an apache.org  email address
 - using a hash other than MD5

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/datafu 

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> * LICENSE file looks OK, but I don't think other LICENSE notices
>  belong there. They typically belong to... NOTICE ;-)

Think they are fine as is. I’ve not run into how to handle the JSON license 
before give it’s permissive it seems best to treat like the MIT or BSD license. 
[1]

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> * I don't see bootstrap (./site/source/javascripts/bootstrap.js,
> ./site/source/javascripts/bootstrap.min.js) in the LICENSE file.  

As this versions of bootstrap is Apache licensed there is no need to add it to 
LICENSE. [1] As there is no NOTICE file nothing need to be added to NOTICE 
[1][2]

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep 

2. https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/tree/v2.0.3 

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.0 (incubating)

[Matthew Hayes]

The vote has passed with four +1 binding votes, and no -1s or 0s.

Jakob Homan  +1 (binding)
Roman Shaposhnik  +1 (binding)
Ashutosh Chauhan  +1 (binding)
Justin Mclean  +1 (binding)

Thanks to all who voted and took the time to look over the release!

Also, thanks Justin for your comments and clarifications.  I will
file/update JIRAs accordingly for the next release.

-Matt


On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > * I don't see bootstrap (./site/source/javascripts/bootstrap.js,
> > ./site/source/javascripts/bootstrap.min.js) in the LICENSE file.
>
> As this versions of bootstrap is Apache licensed there is no need to add
> it to LICENSE. [1] As there is no NOTICE file nothing need to be added to
> NOTICE [1][2]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep <
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep>
> 2. https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/tree/v2.0.3 <
> https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/tree/v2.0.3>