Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3-incubating

[John D. Ament]

Copying my +1 from the dev list

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:39 PM Oliver B. Fischer 
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> The Apache Tamaya team would like to release version 0.3-incubating of
> Apache Tamaya Extensions.
>
> The new release of our extensions as it uses the new 0.3 release of
> Apache Tamya API
>
> The source distribution has been deployed to [1] and the Maven artefacts
> are available at [2].
>
> The full release notes are available at [3].
>
> The project vote has been passed with
>
> 5 binding +1 votes (pmc):
>
> 0 non-binding +1
>
> 0 -1 vote
>
> The vote thread can be found at [4].
>
> Please note:
> This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes and
> no -1’s (see [5]).
>
> 
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released, and why..
> 
>
> [1] https://s.apache.org/NA8w
> [2] https://s.apache.org/79Jw
> [3] https://s.apache.org/SSYr
> [4] https://s.apache.org/vyST
> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251 <+49%2030%2044793251>
> M +49 178 7903538 <+49%20178%207903538>
> E o.b.fisc...@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fisc...@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya Extensions 0.3-incubating

[Oliver B. Fischer]

Dear all,

I would like to ask for your attention and to vote for our next release.

Thank you in advance.

Oliver


Am 16.07.17 um 23:38 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer:

Dear all,

The Apache Tamaya team would like to release version 0.3-incubating of
Apache Tamaya Extensions.

The new release of our extensions as it uses the new 0.3 release of 
Apache Tamya API


The source distribution has been deployed to [1] and the Maven 
artefacts are available at [2].


The full release notes are available at [3].

The project vote has been passed with

5 binding +1 votes (pmc):

0 non-binding +1

0 -1 vote

The vote thread can be found at [4].

Please note:
This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes and
no -1’s (see [5]).


[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released, and why..


[1] https://s.apache.org/NA8w
[2] https://s.apache.org/79Jw
[3] https://s.apache.org/SSYr
[4] https://s.apache.org/vyST
[5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes




--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fisc...@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fisc...@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Git repo creation request no incubator in PMC list

[John D. Ament]

Issue appears to be fixed.  Give it a shot.

John

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:38 PM Olivier Lamy  wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> On 20 July 2017 at 12:19, John D. Ament  wrote:
>
> > Olivier,
> >
> > Looks like a bug with reporeq.  I also do not see incubator in the drop
> > down.  I have submitted
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14658
> > to
> > address.  Hopefully infra can fix soon.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:56 PM Olivier Lamy  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'd like to create a git repo for Gobblin website.
> > > So I follow the documentation and the documentation to create a git
> repo
> > > says to go to  https://reporeq.apache.org/
> > > But here I don't have any option to choose incubator as a PMC so the no
> > > writable field Generated name says: "Your PMCs-incubator-gobblin-site.
> > git"
> > > (see attache screenshot). which is a bit weird.
> > >
> > > So I wonder how to fix that or is there any other tool to use for
> > > incubator?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > --
> > > Olivier Lamy
> > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> > >
> > > [1}
> > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/podling_sourcecontrol.
> > html#set_up_git_repository
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>

[DISCUS] Software Grants/IP Clearance (was Re: Gobblin Incubator Meetup/Video Conference)

[John D. Ament]

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:52 AM Olivier Lamy  wrote:

> Hi,
> So moving forward on Gobblin, (yeah finally software grant bottleneck
> unlock!!).
>

I'm glad you've mentioned this subject.  TBH, based on some of the
discussions that have happened on list, I'm a bit confused why Gobblin
needed a Software Grant Agreement.  Was there a specific ask from the prior
owner to declare a grant?  It looks like Gobblin was always Apache
Licensed.  I don't believe I saw a question raised on this list about the
grant.

>From reading through [1] it's clear that the grants within the document are
meant to be equivalent to the Apache License, v2.  This is useful when the
incoming code base is *not* Apache Licensed, however Gobblin was already
Apache Licensed so really all this did was allow us to change the first
line to read "Licensed to the ASF" instead of the original copyright holder
(which is really OK).

I also think it's useful when accepting such a large grant that it has to
go through an initial IP Clearance.  This will help make the first release
much smoother, and allow us to identify any code that should not have been
granted, sorting through any inappropriate headers.

I plan to start to update guides around this, with a "choose your journey"
style question/answer to guide users into the right path for SGAs, IP
Clearance and the such.

John

[1]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt



>
> Cheers
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>

Re: Gobblin Incubator Meetup/Video Conference

[Abhishek Tiwari]

Hi Raphael,

Yes, these meetups / meetings are informal and open to all and mostly to
answer user questions and give community a potential face time with each
other (without any decision making).

Regards,
Abhishek

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Raphael Bircher 
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Am .07.2017, 06:52 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy :
>
> Hi,
>> So moving forward on Gobblin, (yeah finally software grant bottleneck
>> unlock!!).
>> This community used to have a monthly online conference (such announced
>> https://www.meetup.com/Big-Data-Meetup-LinkedIn/events/239739875/ )
>> The idea is to keep doing with report/links/etc... posted on both user@
>> and
>>
>
> As long the meeting is just informal, and without decision making it's
> fine.
>
> Regards, Raphael
>
>
>
> --
> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Gobblin Incubator Meetup/Video Conference

[Raphael Bircher]

Hi all

Am .07.2017, 06:52 Uhr, schrieb Olivier Lamy :


Hi,
So moving forward on Gobblin, (yeah finally software grant bottleneck
unlock!!).
This community used to have a monthly online conference (such announced
https://www.meetup.com/Big-Data-Meetup-LinkedIn/events/239739875/ )
The idea is to keep doing with report/links/etc... posted on both user@  
and


As long the meeting is just informal, and without decision making it's  
fine.


Regards, Raphael



--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org