Re: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]

[Henry Saputra]

Hank,

I thought the reccomendation was you can include md5 as long as including
other hash like sha?

- Henry

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 10:43 PM Henk P. Penning  wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Lionel Liu wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:13:24 +0100
> > From: Lionel Liu 
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]
> >
> > Hi all,
> >The Apache Griffin community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> > release Apache Griffin 0.2.0-rc1.
>
>Please do NOT include .md5 files in your releases.
>
>See : https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
>
> > Lionel
>
>Thanks ; regards,
>
>Henk Penning
>
>    _
> Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403_/ \_
> Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityT +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \
> Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL  F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/
> http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]

[William Guo]

hi Justin,

Thanks for voting.

We will take this opportunity to have a session learning the license issue
and make sure everyone know the verify process.


Thanks,
William
On behalf of Apache Griffin PPMC


On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> -1 for other reasons than stated by other people. i.e. the source file
> LICENSE file needs work.
>
> Although "unapproved licenses" is misleading as it’s just that those files
> don’t (and shouldn’t) have headers.
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in artefact name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - LICENSE needs some work and incorrectly lists software that is not
> bundled in the source release [2]
> - NOTICE year is incorrect
>
> The start of the license file is a little odd, I suggest using the same
> format as other projects. "Notices for third-party software” is confusing
> as they usually go in the NOTICE file not the LICENSE file. You are also
> missing the full text of the Apache license.
>
> Please do not use URL pointers to licenses, while it useful to know where
> it come from so don’t remove them, these license can change over time or
> disappear. Pleas include the full text of the license in question in the
> release and point to that. [1] Note that for both MIT and B?SD this
> includes a copyright line so you can’t use the same text for all MIT or all
> BSD licenses, please don’t break this up as you have done here. I suggest
> you follow this [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

[sebb]

On 25 March 2018 at 21:23, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If it is bundled and under a ALv2 license you can list it in LICENSE if you 
> want to but it’s not required.

The document also says:

"However, for completeness it is useful to list the products and their
versions, as is done for products under other licenses."

This makes it easier for consumers (and developers) to determine what
licenses apply to the bundled bits.
Otherwise it's not clear whether there is no entry in LICENSE because
it has been overlooked.

> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

If it is bundled and under a ALv2 license you can list it in LICENSE if you 
want to but it’s not required.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

> I think this section means: List the apache-2.0 licensed dependency is not 
> necessary. 

Correct only bundled things need to be considered. The guiding principle makes 
that clear. [1]

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

[peng-yongsheng]

 
BUNDLING AN APACHE-2.0-LICENSED DEPENDENCY 

Assuming once again that that the bundled dependency itself contains no bundled 
subcomponents under other licenses and thus the ALv2 applies uniformly to all 
files, there is no need to modify LICENSE. However, for completeness it is 
useful to list the products and their versions, as is done for products under 
other licenses.

If the dependency supplies a NOTICE file, its contents must be analyzed and the 
relevant portions bubbled up into the top-level NOTICE file.



I think this section means: List the apache-2.0 licensed dependency is not 
necessary. 


> 在 2018年3月25日，21:45，吴晟 Sheng Wu  写道：
> 
> When I recheck our release, we are using Apache HTTPComponent, should its 
> license list in our distribution licenses?
> 
> 
> --
> Sheng Wu
> Apache SkyWalking original creator and PPMC member
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- Original --
> From:  "Matt Sicker";
> Date:  Sun, Mar 25, 2018 01:47 AM
> To:  "general";
> 
> Subject:  Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) 
> version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)
> 
> 
> 
> I’ve primarily used excludes in rat to exclude files that can’t include a
> license header or that does have one but rat doesn’t recognize it (I’ve
> seen this problem with a minified version of jquery for example).
> 
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 03:31, 吴晟 Sheng Wu  wrote:
> 
>> Justin
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks for helping.
>> 
>> 
>> Sheng Wu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---Original---
>> From: "Justin Mclean"
>> Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 16:21 PM
>> To: "general";
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating)
>> version5.0.0-alpha(2nd round)
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> Right now, I updated our rat exclude config as following, is this
>> allowed?
>> 
>> Rat is just a tool, so anything is allowed. It’s up to you to check it
>> complies with ASF policy.
>> 
>>> The concern may about JSON file for our test cases data and frontend/UI
>> dependency descriptions, but JSON format is not allowed to add the header.
>> 
>> You can’t add headers to JSON files so that’s fine.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)

[???? Sheng Wu]

When I recheck our release, we are using Apache HTTPComponent, should its 
license list in our distribution licenses?


--
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking original creator and PPMC member


 




-- Original --
From:  "Matt Sicker";
Date:  Sun, Mar 25, 2018 01:47 AM
To:  "general";

Subject:  Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) 
version5.0.0-alpha(2ndround)



I??ve primarily used excludes in rat to exclude files that can??t include a
license header or that does have one but rat doesn??t recognize it (I??ve
seen this problem with a minified version of jquery for example).

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 03:31,  Sheng Wu  wrote:

> Justin
>
>
> Thanks for helping.
>
>
> Sheng Wu
>
>
>
> ---Original---
> From: "Justin Mclean"
> Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 16:21 PM
> To: "general";
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating)
> version5.0.0-alpha(2nd round)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > Right now, I updated our rat exclude config as following, is this
> allowed?
>
> Rat is just a tool, so anything is allowed. It??s up to you to check it
> complies with ASF policy.
>
> > The concern may about JSON file for our test cases data and frontend/UI
> dependency descriptions, but JSON format is not allowed to add the header.
>
> You can??t add headers to JSON files so that??s fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

-- 
Matt Sicker