Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

[Jan Lahoda]

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Ate Douma  wrote:

>
>
> On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote:
>
>> Ate, could we get a vote on this release?
>>
>
> Sure :-)
>
>
>> If you look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>> uence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we are already making
>> progress on the (non-blocking) issues reported.
>>
>
> Yes, thanks for creating the follow-up issues to address the reported
> issues.
> With those tickets and the explanation given on my first question
> I'm now +1 on this release candidate.
>
> I would like to add that I agree with Justin that, while it might not be
> a ASF policy issue to have a GPL license file in the distribution, I
> also don't see how it serves any purpose and only will trigger
> unnecessary warnings or worries by users or checker tools.
> My recommendation is to get rid of those GPL license files.
>

PR sent removing the license files:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/561

Thanks,
 Jan


> Regards,
> Ate
>
>
>
>> --emi
>>
>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>>
>> On 21 May 2018 3:54 PM, Ate Douma  wrote:
>>
>> I'm inclined to vote positive on this RC1, overall looks great!
>>>
>>> -   verified the MD5 and SHA1, and PGP signatures with the ASC files.
>>> -   executed rat check (ant rat) and verified the report.
>>> -   build and run the source (using JDK8), and all seems fine.
>>>   However I still have two questions:
>>>   a) nbbuild/licenses folder still has the GPL license file,
>>> which I
>>>   thought/expected no longer should be needed with the fix from
>>>   NETBEANS-305 [1]?
>>>   Is there still a GPL usage left? If so this then could be a
>>> blocker IMO.
>>>   b) Justin provided detailed feedback on the 9.0-Beta-RC3 on
>>> (possible)
>>>   needed improvements/fixes for the binary dist LICENSE/NOTICE
>>> file [2],
>>>   thereafter recorded as a todo action list on the wiki [3] (end
>>> of page).
>>>   Some of those points have been addressed (marked DONE), but
>>> many/most
>>>   are not, and neither resolved/fixed (or otherwise marked as
>>> NVT).
>>>   As just an example, Justin noticed for the
>>> ./ide/modules/ext/smackx.jar
>>>   file that it included the BSD licensed JZlib, which wasn't
>>> mentioned in
>>>   the LICENSE file. And still isn't for this 9.0-RC1.
>>>   I don't think any of those are blockers, but it would be good
>>> to address
>>>   these (create NETBEANS issues for them) before the final 9.0
>>> release.
>>>   Regards, Ate
>>>   [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-305
>>>   https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/540
>>>   [2]
>>>   http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/
>>> 201801.mbox/
>>>   [3]
>>>   https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+
>>> NetBeans+9.0+Beta+rc3
>>>   On 2018-05-21 00:33, Emilian Bold wrote:
>>>
>>>
 Hi all,

 The Apache NetBeans community has voted on and approved a proposal to
 release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1.

 We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
 this incubator release candidate.

 Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) vote thread:

 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c2a06adc83e2819e6d96c7d
 ff8d0e22a97001f99bfda12515d4d9609@

 Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) vote result thread:

 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94f7a5e4601e26c7edb8264
 df7df53dd8ed215ecfc568816a162f2af@

 Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) constitutes all the modules in the
 Apache NetBeans Git repo, which together provide the NetBeans Platform
 (i.e., the underlying application framework), as well as all the modules
 that provide the Java SE-related features of Apache NetBeans.

 In short, Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) is a full IDE for Java
 SE development.

 Build artifacts available here:

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/in
 cubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-rc1-rc1

 The specific artifact to be voted on:

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/in
 cubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-rc1-rc1/incubating-
 netbeans-java-9.0-rc1-source.zip

 Included in the above are the DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and
 NOTICE files, as well as a README file with build instructions, which are
 the same as these:

 https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/blob/master/README.md

 SHA1: a1a265455c8246f849b14982fa3c36b351b21876

 KEYS file:

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/netbeans/KEYS

 Apache NetBeans Git Repo tag: 9.0-rc1-rc1:

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.2.0 (RC1)

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

As noted by others please remove the MD5 hash.

+1 binding

I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE year needs updating
- LICENSE is OK
- Files have ASF headers . This file may be missing one. [1]
- No unexpected binary files
- dirndl;t compile as I don’t have the right set up

LICENSE may be missing license for:
- ALv2 file [2] copyright TensorFlow authors 

Thanks,
Justin

1.  incubator-singa/doc/en/docs/notebook/utils.py
2.  incubator-singa/examples/imagenet/inception/convert.py


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 5

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK and NOTICE good
- All source files have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source

Minor issue is that LICENSE is missing mention of these files [1][2][3] (but 
includes their license), be nice to fix that for the net release.

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./pulsar-client-cpp/lib/checksum/int_types.h
2. ./pulsar-client-cpp/lib/checksum/crc32c_sse42.h
3. ./pulsar-client-cpp/lib/checksum/crc32c_sse42.cc
4. ./pulsar-client-cpp/lib/checksum/gf2.hpp
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc1)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

-1 (binding) as the release artefacts don’t include the word “incubating” [1] 
and LICENSE and NOTICE require work

Please remove the md5 hashes as they should no longer be included.

I checked:
- incubator rather than incubating is in release artefact names
- signatures and sha512 hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing a BSD license
- LICENSE and NOTICE include things that are not in the source release 
- No binary files in release
- Can compile from source

LICENSE is missing BSD license for these files [2][3][4]. Note that a condition 
of the BSD license is to include it’s text, the text is missing form the 
headers and not included in LICENSE.

It also look like the LICENSE and NOTICE are listing dependance not what is 
actually bundled in the release.

From what I can see for the source release LICENSE should be boiler place and 
include the BSD license mentioned above and nothing else, NOTICE should be 
boilerplate and a few lines long. Please review [5] and in particular the 
guiding principle. It likely that your convenience binary will need a different 
LICENSE and NOTICE.

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
2. 
/ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/util/PureJavaCrc32C.java
3. 
/ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32.c
4. 
/ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32_x86.c
5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
6. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 5

[Sijie Guo]

Thank you Willem. Comments inline

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Willem Jiang 
wrote:

> my +1.
>
> I checked:
>
> The sign and check sum for both src and binary distributions.
> The License and Notice file for src and binary distributions.
> I can build the binary from source.
>
> Here are some minor issues I found, it's not blocker issues please verify
> them and we can fix it in the next release.
>
> 1. It's a little big size for the binary ,  so I checked the files.
> It looks like there are java-instance.jar which holds all the jars in the
> lib directory. I think we need to find a way to avoid shipping the jars
> twice.
>

java-instance.jar is a uber jar including all the dependencies for running
pulsar functions in process mode.

it is needed for this release, because there are conflicts between
different protobuf/netty versions. so we have to do proper shading to
handle that.

we are addressing that in master, the situation can be improved in 2.1
release.


>
> 2. There are three different version of Netty in the library,
> io.netty-netty-3.10.1.Final.jar
> io.netty-netty-all-4.1.21.Final.jar
> io.netty-netty-codec-http2-4.1.12.Final.jar
>
> as netty 3.x and netty4.x use different package name, we may need to go
> through all the netty 4.x dependencies.
>

yeah. pulsar is using 4.1.21, however 3.10.1 and 4.1.12 are coming from its
transitive dependencies. hope that clarifies.


>
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Matteo Merli  wrote:
>
> > This is the fifth release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version
> > 2.0.0-rc1-incubating.
> >
> > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
> > commodity hardware.
> > It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, guaranteed
> at-least-once
> > delivery of
> > messages, automatic cursor management for subscribers, and
> geo-replication.
> >
> > The only difference from previous candidate is a fix on the LICENSE
> > attached to bin distribution to correctly reflect all dependencies and
> > versions.
> >
> > Link to the voting thread on pulsar dev list:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/81359fe55cb75cd1621a70e9a5a0af
> > 02fb1a84549ab0046d335182fa@%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/milestone/12?closed=1
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay
> > open
> > for at least 72 hours ***
> >
> > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
> > convenience.
> >
> > Source and binary files:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pulsar/
> > pulsar-2.0.0-rc1-incubating-candidate-5/
> >
> > SHA-1 checksums:
> > 72ee624c9b1485cc4c12b71e3807c7c05ec900ad
> > apache-pulsar-2.0.0-rc1-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> > c525457db8f9c4ea859c595c93e9207631cda19f
> > apache-pulsar-2.0.0-rc1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepulsar-1017/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> > v2.0.0-rc1-incubating-candidate-5 (08708a198606fb934e46f6cb0b614f
> > 2babf613e4)
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/releases/tag/
> > v2.0.0-rc1-incubating-candidate-5
> >
> > Pulsar's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pulsar/KEYS
> >
> > Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> > and run the Pulsar standalone service.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > 
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

I know the vote is over but I checked the release - the source release is fine 
and I would of voted +1 (binding).

 Some of the thing that look like they need to be fixed:
- source NOTICE contains wrong year
- binary NOTICE contains wrong year
- binary NOTICE incorrectly list ASF licenses. These shoddy be put in LICENSE 
[1]
- binary NOTICE is missing information from bundled ALv2 software [1][2]

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> 3) I dont believe category B (for example the EPL dependencies in
> binary license) dependencies belong in the license (binary or
> otherwise).  https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>  It is my understanding those would be reflected in the notice.

It’s unlikely that any category B including in a release will effect a LICENSE 
file, license information goes in LICENSE not NOTICE. They are usually treated 
the same way as MIT/BSD permissive licenses [1] but it can of course vary on a 
license by license.

Thanks,
Justin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- All source files have ASF headers
- No binary files in release
- Can compile from source

Would be a good idea to sign the release artificers with an apache email 
address not an IBM one.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

I checked:
- incubating in name
- Signatures and hashed good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE may have a minor issue (see below)
- source file have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
- fails to compile from source a s I have wrong version of protobuf installed???

One minor issue there are several files [1][2][3][4] that have “Copyright (c) 
2010 Yahoo!” in their headers, given the NOTICE file, I would of expected these 
files to have ASF headers OR the copyright line to not appear in NOTICE.

It would be a good idea to sign with an apache email address.

Thanks,
Justin

1. 
./benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/omid/benchmarks/utils/ScrambledZipfianGenerator.java
2. 
./benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/omid/benchmarks/utils/IntegerGenerator.java
3. ./benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/omid/benchmarks/utils/Generator.java
4. 
./benchmarks/src/main/java/org/apache/omid/benchmarks/utils/ZipfianGenerator.java
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 5

[Willem Jiang]

my +1.

I checked:

The sign and check sum for both src and binary distributions.
The License and Notice file for src and binary distributions.
I can build the binary from source.

Here are some minor issues I found, it's not blocker issues please verify
them and we can fix it in the next release.

1. It's a little big size for the binary ,  so I checked the files.
It looks like there are java-instance.jar which holds all the jars in the
lib directory. I think we need to find a way to avoid shipping the jars
twice.

2. There are three different version of Netty in the library,
io.netty-netty-3.10.1.Final.jar
io.netty-netty-all-4.1.21.Final.jar
io.netty-netty-codec-http2-4.1.12.Final.jar

as netty 3.x and netty4.x use different package name, we may need to go
through all the netty 4.x dependencies.


Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Matteo Merli  wrote:

> This is the fifth release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version
> 2.0.0-rc1-incubating.
>
> Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
> commodity hardware.
> It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, guaranteed at-least-once
> delivery of
> messages, automatic cursor management for subscribers, and geo-replication.
>
> The only difference from previous candidate is a fix on the LICENSE
> attached to bin distribution to correctly reflect all dependencies and
> versions.
>
> Link to the voting thread on pulsar dev list:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/81359fe55cb75cd1621a70e9a5a0af
> 02fb1a84549ab0046d335182fa@%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/milestone/12?closed=1
>
> *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay
> open
> for at least 72 hours ***
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
> convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pulsar/
> pulsar-2.0.0-rc1-incubating-candidate-5/
>
> SHA-1 checksums:
> 72ee624c9b1485cc4c12b71e3807c7c05ec900ad
> apache-pulsar-2.0.0-rc1-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> c525457db8f9c4ea859c595c93e9207631cda19f
> apache-pulsar-2.0.0-rc1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepulsar-1017/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> v2.0.0-rc1-incubating-candidate-5 (08708a198606fb934e46f6cb0b614f
> 2babf613e4)
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/releases/tag/
> v2.0.0-rc1-incubating-candidate-5
>
> Pulsar's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pulsar/KEYS
>
> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run the Pulsar standalone service.
>
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
> 
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 Release

[Steffen Rochel]

I would like to thank Anirudh for his leadership, dedication, patience and
hard work to manage the v1.2 release.
And thanks to all committers and contributors for another big step forward
with MXNet.

Thanks,
Steffen

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:32 AM Anirudh Subramanian 
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of
> Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0!
>
>
>
> Blog:
>
> https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/announcing-apache-mxnet-1-2-0-d94f56da154b
>
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for
> both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and
> imperative programming to maximize efficiency and productivity.
>
> This release improves usability, performance and interoperability.
>
> A full list of the changes in this release can be found in the release
> notes:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes
>
>
> A Link to the Download is here:
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0
>
>
> If you prefer to build from source and experiment with various
> compile-time configuration options, use this link to get the
> instructions:
> http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
>
> Or You can download and play with MXNet easily using one of the options
> below:
>1. The Pip package can be found here:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mxnet
>2. The Docker Images can be found here:
> https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/
>
> The release tag used for the 1.2.0 release is:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/1.2.0
>
> Some more MXNet Resources:
>1. Issues: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues
>2. Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET
>3. Twitter: @ApacheMXNet 
>
>4. YouTube: Apachemxnet channel 
>
>5. Medium: https://medium.com/apache-mxnet
>
>6. Reddit: /r/mxnet 
>
>
>
>
>
> If you want to learn more about MXNet visit
> http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/
>
> Finally, you are welcome to join and also invite your friends to the
> dynamic and growing MXNet community by subscribing to
> d...@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
>
> Thanks!
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) Team
> ___
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at The
>
> Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache
>
> Incubator PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted
>
> projects until a further review indicates that the
>
> infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have
>
> stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF
>
> projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection
>
> of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate
>
> that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.
>

[ANNOUNCE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 Release

[Anirudh Subramanian]

Hello all,

The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of
Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0!



Blog:

https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/announcing-apache-mxnet-1-2-0-d94f56da154b


Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for
both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and
imperative programming to maximize efficiency and productivity.

This release improves usability, performance and interoperability.

A full list of the changes in this release can be found in the release
notes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes


A Link to the Download is here:
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0


If you prefer to build from source and experiment with various
compile-time configuration options, use this link to get the
instructions:
http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html

Or You can download and play with MXNet easily using one of the options
below:
   1. The Pip package can be found here: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mxnet
   2. The Docker Images can be found here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/

The release tag used for the 1.2.0 release is:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/1.2.0

Some more MXNet Resources:
   1. Issues: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues
   2. Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET
   3. Twitter: @ApacheMXNet 

   4. YouTube: Apachemxnet channel 

   5. Medium: https://medium.com/apache-mxnet

   6. Reddit: /r/mxnet 





If you want to learn more about MXNet visit
http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/

Finally, you are welcome to join and also invite your friends to the
dynamic and growing MXNet community by subscribing to
d...@mxnet.incubator.apache.org

Thanks!

Apache MXNet (incubating) Team
___


DISCLAIMER:

Apache MXNet (incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at The

Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache

Incubator PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted

projects until a further review indicates that the

infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have

stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF

projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection

of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate

that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc1)

[Jakob Homan]

+1 (binding) forwarding my vote from the podling VOTE.
-Jakob


On 25 May 2018 at 09:37, Elek, Marton  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Apache Ratis community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Ratis 0.2.0-rc1.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release candidate.
>
> Apache Ratis is a highly customizable Raft protocol implementation in Java.
>
> The vote thread is at:
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ratis-dev/201805.mbox/%3C298984b0-cafc-3821-c3ed-93f44aa9c308%40apache.org%3E
>
> and the result is at:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ratis-dev/201805.mbox/%3C8629db29-b2a0-e172-58f2-51855d8eb5f7%40apache.org%3E
>
>
> This is the second incubator release and it includes more than 120
> improvements and fixes since the previous 0.1.0-alpha release. This is the
> first release
> which includes a binary package with ready to use example project.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc1
>
> Staged artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1004
>
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 0EE79B28, corresponding to
> e...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file
> (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS).
>
> This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
>
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0EE79B28
>
> Or in the apache phonebook:
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elek.asc
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with ratis-0.2.0-rc1
> (bd234f25c29e918ad3db88bfedcc2d6931221a3e)
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.2.0-rc1
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thank you very much,
> Marton
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc1)

[Elek, Marton]

Hi All,

The Apache Ratis community has voted on and approved a proposal to 
release Apache Ratis 0.2.0-rc1.


We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on 
this incubator release candidate.


Apache Ratis is a highly customizable Raft protocol implementation in Java.

The vote thread is at:

https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ratis-dev/201805.mbox/%3C298984b0-cafc-3821-c3ed-93f44aa9c308%40apache.org%3E

and the result is at:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ratis-dev/201805.mbox/%3C8629db29-b2a0-e172-58f2-51855d8eb5f7%40apache.org%3E


This is the second incubator release and it includes more than 120 
improvements and fixes since the previous 0.1.0-alpha release. This is 
the first release

which includes a binary package with ready to use example project.

All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc1

Staged artifacts can be found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1004


This release has been signed with PGP key 0EE79B28, corresponding to
e...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file 
(https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS).


This key can be found on keyservers, such as:

http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0EE79B28

Or in the apache phonebook:

https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elek.asc

The release candidate has been tagged in git with ratis-0.2.0-rc1 
(bd234f25c29e918ad3db88bfedcc2d6931221a3e)


https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.2.0-rc1

Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Thank you very much,
Marton

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

[Jonas Pfefferle]

Ok, I will include the public KEYS URL in future calls for vote.

Thanks,
Jonas

 On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:25:24 +0100
 sebb  wrote:

On 25 May 2018 at 12:10, Jonas Pfefferle  wrote:

Hi Willem
You can find the KEYS file here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS

Is that sufficient or do we also need to put the file here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/ ?


Please only one location where the KEYS are maintained.

The one under dist/release is required, so use only that one.

The VOTE mail might as well use the URL which is provided to the 
general public:


https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS

That shows that the KEYS file is ready for the release.



Thanks,
Jonas

 On Fri, 25 May 2018 11:42:28 +0800

 Willem Jiang  wrote:


I found the KEY file from the PPMC voting mail[1].
According to note of from apache key home[2], the Key for release 
should

not be the link.

  - The KEYS files must be stored in the ASF mirror directories. 
This
  ensures that they are archived along with the releases to which 
they

apply.
  - The KEYS file are needed to check signatures of archived 
releases.
  Thus keys should only ever be added to the KEYS file, and never 
normally
  removed. Now the LDAP group for a project will change over time, 
and a
  committer who signed one or more releases may no longer be in the 
group.
  Also if a project moves to the Attic, its LDAP group will be 
removed.


[1]https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00268.html
[2]https://people.apache.org/keys/


Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Willem Jiang 


wrote:


I can build the kit after skipping the test and there is a build
instruction in the README.  I'm sorry I didn't find it at first 
check.
Now I have some trouble to find the signing key from the 
distribution

directory.  We normally provide it in the KEY directory.


Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Jonas Pfefferle 
wrote:


Hi,

At the moment there is no way to run the tests without setting up a
configuration for your system (Crail needs hugepage mountpoint, 
network

interfaces etc).
For that reason we instruct people in the README to build with
"-DskipTests".

If you want to deploy/configure Crail to run the tests you need to 
setup
the CRAIL_HOME environment variable and adapt the Crail 
configuration

with
your network settings etc. Check the README for more detailed
instructions.

Thanks,
Jonas

 On Wed, 23 May 2018 10:33:09 +0800

 Willem Jiang  wrote:


Hi,

I just tried to build from the source kit and got the test error due 
to

missing crail-site.conf.
I checked the README and cannot find any note for solving this 
problem.


testRenameFile(org.apache.crail.ClientTest): 
null/conf/crail-site.conf

(No
such file or directory)
 testRenameFile(org.apache.crail.ClientTest)
 testlookupDirectory(org.apache.crail.ClientTest):
null/conf/crail-site.conf (No such file or directory)


Willem Jiang

Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
 http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Jonas Pfefferle 
wrote:

Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail
1.0-incubating


(RC3).
This release candidate fixes all issues raised in the last IPMC 
vote:

- Add DISCLAIMER
- Move IBM copyright from NOTICE file to CREDITS file and fix
formatting
of Apache copyright
- Leading directory name in tar/zip file is now
"apache-crail-1.0-incubating-src"

The podling dev vote thread:

https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00268.html

The result:

https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00274.html

Commit hash: 0db64fddad52044eab75ee73e1857c7bcf6fae7d

https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.
git;a=commit;h=0db64fddad52044eab75ee73e1857c7bcf6fae7d

Release files can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.0-rc3/

The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of 
at

least
3 +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Thanks,
Jonas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

[sebb]

On 25 May 2018 at 12:10, Jonas Pfefferle  wrote:
> Hi Willem
> You can find the KEYS file here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS
>
> Is that sufficient or do we also need to put the file here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/ ?

Please only one location where the KEYS are maintained.

The one under dist/release is required, so use only that one.

The VOTE mail might as well use the URL which is provided to the general public:

https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS

That shows that the KEYS file is ready for the release.

>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
>  On Fri, 25 May 2018 11:42:28 +0800
>
>  Willem Jiang  wrote:
>>
>> I found the KEY file from the PPMC voting mail[1].
>> According to note of from apache key home[2], the Key for release should
>> not be the link.
>>
>>   - The KEYS files must be stored in the ASF mirror directories. This
>>   ensures that they are archived along with the releases to which they
>> apply.
>>   - The KEYS file are needed to check signatures of archived releases.
>>   Thus keys should only ever be added to the KEYS file, and never normally
>>   removed. Now the LDAP group for a project will change over time, and a
>>   committer who signed one or more releases may no longer be in the group.
>>   Also if a project moves to the Attic, its LDAP group will be removed.
>>
>> [1]https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00268.html
>> [2]https://people.apache.org/keys/
>>
>>
>> Willem Jiang
>>
>> Twitter: willemjiang
>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Willem Jiang 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I can build the kit after skipping the test and there is a build
>>> instruction in the README.  I'm sorry I didn't find it at first check.
>>> Now I have some trouble to find the signing key from the distribution
>>> directory.  We normally provide it in the KEY directory.
>>>
>>>
>>> Willem Jiang
>>>
>>> Twitter: willemjiang
>>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Jonas Pfefferle 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 At the moment there is no way to run the tests without setting up a
 configuration for your system (Crail needs hugepage mountpoint, network
 interfaces etc).
 For that reason we instruct people in the README to build with
 "-DskipTests".

 If you want to deploy/configure Crail to run the tests you need to setup
 the CRAIL_HOME environment variable and adapt the Crail configuration
 with
 your network settings etc. Check the README for more detailed
 instructions.

 Thanks,
 Jonas

  On Wed, 23 May 2018 10:33:09 +0800

  Willem Jiang  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just tried to build from the source kit and got the test error due to
> missing crail-site.conf.
> I checked the README and cannot find any note for solving this problem.
>
> testRenameFile(org.apache.crail.ClientTest): null/conf/crail-site.conf
> (No
> such file or directory)
>  testRenameFile(org.apache.crail.ClientTest)
>  testlookupDirectory(org.apache.crail.ClientTest):
> null/conf/crail-site.conf (No such file or directory)
>
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>  http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Jonas Pfefferle 
> wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail
> 1.0-incubating
>>
>> (RC3).
>> This release candidate fixes all issues raised in the last IPMC vote:
>> - Add DISCLAIMER
>> - Move IBM copyright from NOTICE file to CREDITS file and fix
>> formatting
>> of Apache copyright
>> - Leading directory name in tar/zip file is now
>> "apache-crail-1.0-incubating-src"
>>
>> The podling dev vote thread:
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00268.html
>>
>> The result:
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00274.html
>>
>> Commit hash: 0db64fddad52044eab75ee73e1857c7bcf6fae7d
>>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.
>> git;a=commit;h=0db64fddad52044eab75ee73e1857c7bcf6fae7d
>>
>> Release files can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.0-rc3/
>>
>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> least
>> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.0-incubating
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonas
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

[Jonas Pfefferle]

Hi Willem
You can find the KEYS file here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS

Is that sufficient or do we also need to put the file 
here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/ ?



Thanks,
Jonas

 On Fri, 25 May 2018 11:42:28 +0800
 Willem Jiang  wrote:

I found the KEY file from the PPMC voting mail[1].
According to note of from apache key home[2], the Key for release 
should

not be the link.

  - The KEYS files must be stored in the ASF mirror directories. 
This
  ensures that they are archived along with the releases to which 
they apply.
  - The KEYS file are needed to check signatures of archived 
releases.
  Thus keys should only ever be added to the KEYS file, and never 
normally
  removed. Now the LDAP group for a project will change over time, 
and a
  committer who signed one or more releases may no longer be in the 
group.
  Also if a project moves to the Attic, its LDAP group will be 
removed.


[1]https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00268.html
[2]https://people.apache.org/keys/


Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Willem Jiang 


wrote:


I can build the kit after skipping the test and there is a build
instruction in the README.  I'm sorry I didn't find it at first 
check.
Now I have some trouble to find the signing key from the 
distribution

directory.  We normally provide it in the KEY directory.


Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Jonas Pfefferle  
wrote:



Hi,

At the moment there is no way to run the tests without setting up a
configuration for your system (Crail needs hugepage mountpoint, 
network

interfaces etc).
For that reason we instruct people in the README to build with
"-DskipTests".

If you want to deploy/configure Crail to run the tests you need to 
setup
the CRAIL_HOME environment variable and adapt the Crail 
configuration with
your network settings etc. Check the README for more detailed 
instructions.


Thanks,
Jonas

 On Wed, 23 May 2018 10:33:09 +0800

 Willem Jiang  wrote:


Hi,

I just tried to build from the source kit and got the test error due 
to

missing crail-site.conf.
I checked the README and cannot find any note for solving this 
problem.


testRenameFile(org.apache.crail.ClientTest): 
null/conf/crail-site.conf

(No
such file or directory)
 testRenameFile(org.apache.crail.ClientTest)
 testlookupDirectory(org.apache.crail.ClientTest):
null/conf/crail-site.conf (No such file or directory)


Willem Jiang

Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
 http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Jonas Pfefferle 
wrote:

Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail 
1.0-incubating

(RC3).
This release candidate fixes all issues raised in the last IPMC 
vote:

- Add DISCLAIMER
- Move IBM copyright from NOTICE file to CREDITS file and fix 
formatting

of Apache copyright
- Leading directory name in tar/zip file is now
"apache-crail-1.0-incubating-src"

The podling dev vote thread:

https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00268.html

The result:

https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00274.html

Commit hash: 0db64fddad52044eab75ee73e1857c7bcf6fae7d

https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.
git;a=commit;h=0db64fddad52044eab75ee73e1857c7bcf6fae7d

Release files can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.0-rc3/

The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of 
at

least
3 +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Thanks,
Jonas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.2.0 (RC1)

[Henk P. Penning]

On Fri, 25 May 2018, Moaz Reyad wrote:


Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 09:00:47 +0200
From: Moaz Reyad 
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: d...@singa.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.2.0 (RC1)


  ...


The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.2.0/

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
MD5:  2D 7E 67 84 6B AA B5 70  5D 77 52 C3 5E C6 4B 98


  Please do /not/ use MD5 anymore ; as per ASF policy :

https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums

  This is obsolete, and shouldn't be published :


https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.2.0/apache-singa-incubating-1.2.0-RC1.tar.gz.md5

  Note : this is just a remark, not a vote ; please continue ...

  Thanks ; regards,

  Henk Penning

   _
Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403_/ \_
Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityT +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \
Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL  F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/
http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.2.0 (RC1)

[Moaz Reyad]

Hi all,

The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
SINGA 1.2.0 (incubating).

The vote thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201805.mbox/%3CCAH%3DWUUaxPWA8BpcVcFaEt0pd2Nx%3DhqwnQkxpSi1XSyRv-zsgmQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E

and the result is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201805.mbox/%3CCAH%3DWUUZH2Uh%3Dfi0rFSvaLQK6kMN3coWPjvCiHVTK7b2RbS2%2Bww%40mail.gmail.com%3E


We ask the IPMC to vote on this release.

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.2.0/

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
MD5:  2D 7E 67 84 6B AA B5 70  5D 77 52 C3 5E C6 4B 98

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/dinhtta.asc

and the signature file is:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.2.0/apache-singa-incubating-1.2.0-RC1.tar.gz.asc

The Github tag is at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-singa/releases/tag/v1.2.0-rc1
commit ID is: c343ff95019e05512c95f05588ae374684d9c5df

To check the license, you can use the Apache Rat tool as follows:
1. download & decompress apache rat from
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/download_rat.cgi
2. run the following command under singa folder:
java -jar /PATH/TO/RAT/apache-rat-0.11.jar -E rat-excludes -d . >
rat_check
3. check the results in file named "rat_check"

Please check and vote on releasing this package. The vote is open for at
least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SINGA 1.2.0-incubating
[ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Best Regards,
Moaz