Re: March 2019 Incubator report timeline

[Tan,Zhongyi]

got

thanks for reminder

> 在 2019年2月21日，07:10，Justin Mclean  写道：
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> I think that Pinot is missing from the list. I can see Pinot within the
>> contents but not on the "Shepherd Assignments”
> 
> Might a bug, you were supposed to stop reopening monthly this month but 
> missed out on an earlier December report.
> 
>> Can you add us?
> 
> Shepherd assignment are random and not all podlings get one so unless a 
> shepherd has extra bandwidth not much that can be done, either way it’s not a 
> concern.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

[John D. Ament]

+1 to accept the proposal

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:50 PM Antoine Toulme  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The
> proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
>
> We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in
> [2].
> I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made there.
>
> According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
>
> A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote.
> Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
> It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
> whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
>
> This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it open for
> longer). Please VOTE as follows:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...
>
> Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past discussions!
> Antoine
>
> [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [2]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [3]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
> [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

[larry mccay]

+1

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:33 PM Byung-Gon Chun  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:20 AM Dave Fisher  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Looking forward to this podling!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The
> > > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
> > >
> > > We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in
> > [2].
> > > I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made
> there.
> > >
> > > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept
> the
> > > new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> > >
> > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote.
> > > Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are
> binding.
> > > It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment
> stating
> > > whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
> > >
> > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it open
> > for
> > > longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
> > > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...
> > >
> > > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past discussions!
> > > Antoine
> > >
> > > [1]:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > [2]:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > [3]:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
> > > [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Byung-Gon Chun
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

[Byung-Gon Chun]

+1 (binding)

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:20 AM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Looking forward to this podling!
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The
> > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
> >
> > We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in
> [2].
> > I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made there.
> >
> > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> > new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> >
> > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote.
> > Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
> > It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
> > whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
> >
> > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it open
> for
> > longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
> > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...
> >
> > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past discussions!
> > Antoine
> >
> > [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > [2]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > [3]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
> > [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Byung-Gon Chun

Re: Ask for the write permission for incubator wiki

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> May I have the access to the incubator wiki so that I can update the
> podling report?

Done.

Thanks,
Justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: March 2019 Incubator report timeline

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> I think that Pinot is missing from the list. I can see Pinot within the
> contents but not on the "Shepherd Assignments”

Might a bug, you were supposed to stop reopening monthly this month but missed 
out on an earlier December report.

> Can you add us?

Shepherd assignment are random and not all podlings get one so unless a 
shepherd has extra bandwidth not much that can be done, either way it’s not a 
concern.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Ask for the write permission for incubator wiki

[Seunghyun Lee]

Hi all,

May I have the access to the incubator wiki so that I can update the
podling report?

My username is "SeunghyunLee
"

Best,
Seunghyun

Re: March 2019 Incubator report timeline

[Seunghyun Lee]

Hi Justin,

I think that Pinot is missing from the list. I can see Pinot within the
contents but not on the "Shepherd Assignments"

Can you add us?

Best,
Seunghyun

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:15 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Here’s the timeline for March [1]
>
> Wed March 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day
> Sun March 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
> Sun March 10 -- Summary due by end of day
> Tue March 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
> Wed March 13 -- Report submitted to Board
> Wed March 20 -- Board meeting
>
> Podlings expended to report:
>
> Brpc
> Crail
> Daffodil
> Dlab
> Druid
> Dubbo
> Hivemall
> Hudi
> Iceberg
> IoTdb
> Marvin-ai
> Myriad
> Nemo
> Omid
> Openwhisk
> Ponymail
> Samoa
> Shardingsphere
> Singa
> Skywalking
> Spot
> Superset
> Taverna
> Tephra
> Training
> Warble
> Zipkin
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2019
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

March 2019 Incubator report timeline

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

Here’s the timeline for March [1]

Wed March 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun March 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun March 10 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue March 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
Wed March 13 -- Report submitted to Board
Wed March 20 -- Board meeting

Podlings expended to report:

Brpc
Crail
Daffodil
Dlab
Druid
Dubbo
Hivemall
Hudi
Iceberg
IoTdb
Marvin-ai
Myriad
Nemo
Omid
Openwhisk
Ponymail
Samoa
Shardingsphere
Singa
Skywalking
Spot
Superset
Taverna
Tephra
Training
Warble
Zipkin

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2019
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

mod_pagespeed podling website

[Rich Bowen]

It was mentioned in the Serf board report today that the mod_pagespeed
podling does not have a website. Or, possibly, that the link from
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/pagespeed.html to
http://pagespeed.incubator.apache.org/ is incorrect?

Can either the Mentors or PPMC members for this project look into this,
please? Thanks.

-- 
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://rcbowen.com/
@rbowen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

[Dave Fisher]

+1 (binding)

Looking forward to this podling!

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The
> proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
> 
> We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in [2].
> I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made there.
> 
> According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> 
> A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote.
> Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
> It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
> whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
> 
> This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it open for
> longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...
> 
> Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past discussions!
> Antoine
> 
> [1]: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [2]: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [3]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
> [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

[Kevin A. McGrail]

+1 binding with the condition that a new name is picked before the
onboarding starts to lighten the load on the foundation (especially Infra).

On 2/20/2019 2:50 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The
> proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
>
> We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in [2].
> I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made there.
>
> According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
>
> A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote.
> Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
> It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
> whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
>
> This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it open for
> longer). Please VOTE as follows:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...
>
> Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past discussions!
> Antoine
>
> [1]: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [2]: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [3]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
> [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

[Antoine Toulme]

Hi everyone,

we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The
proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].

We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in [2].
I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made there.

According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.

A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote.
Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
whether your vote is binding or non-binding.

This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it open for
longer). Please VOTE as follows:

[ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
[ ] +0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...

Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past discussions!
Antoine

[1]: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
[2]: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
[3]: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
[4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

[Piyush Ghai]

Dear community,

This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release 
candidate RC3. 

Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. 

Vote thread :
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/618ad28580e838254f998deb71373467374a05228401dae0323a6d0f@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
 



Results thread :

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68373b7be4a12e90f136aab2d55a334fad021bec7b796174d357f4b7@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
 

 

The community raised the following issues which are not considered as release 
stopper :

1. NOTICE year is wrong (2018): Not considered a stopping issue as release
was started in 2018.


The source tar ball, including signature, digests etc can be found at : 

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc3/ 


The tag to be voted upon :
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc3 


The release hash is a03d59e 
>
 :

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/a03d59ed867ba334d78d61246a1090cd1868f5da
 


Release artifacts are signed with the following key : 

0812 9523 58B1 2DC3 0536 E7E0 C069 16C3 AB88 ABFE

KEYS file available :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS 
 

The vote will end on Monday, February 25th, 4:00 PM PDT or until the sufficient 
number of votes is reached. 

[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.4.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...


Thanks,
Piyush

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

[Antoine Toulme]

Hello all,

Thank you for your feedback. We will move to change the name.

At this point, it looks like the project itself is a good fit for the incubator.
I will open a vote for acceptance into the incubator.
In parallel or quickly after, I will also hold a vote to help select a name 
amongst the propositions made so far.

Cheers,

Antoine

> On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:44 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Ah yes... agreed.
> 
>> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:33 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>> 
>> Jim,
>> 
>> The potential conflict is a small San Francisco blockchain software comp[any 
>> called kava.io .
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>>> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 keeping as-is.
>>> 
 On Feb 18, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
 
 First, a heartfelt thank you to all for participating in this discussion.
 
 I am tempted to keep Cava _for now_ given this late feedback, and proceed 
 to proposing the project.
 To be more precise, I recommend we get the project into the incubator with 
 this name. We can change the name of the project 3 to 6 months in.
 
 We have so far received significant interest from the Apache community and 
 others, and it looks like we can go from there.
 
 John, good point on this website, kava.io. I note the company is named 
 Kava Labs Inc. and their GitHub is Kava-Labs.
 https://github.com/Kava-Labs
 It also looks like their code is in the crypto domain, but more on the 
 interchange/wallet side and written in Go and TypeScript.
 I’ll add them to the list when performing the suitable name search item on 
 Jira.
 
 I am going to give everyone 48 hours to voice strong opinions against this 
 approach.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Antoine
 
> On Feb 18, 2019, at 9:04 AM, John D. Ament  wrote:
> 
> If the project is already known as Cava and is looking to move to Apache, 
> I
> would recommend starting off as Cava.  I can see that there's already a
> presence for it - https://github.com/ConsenSys/cava
> 
> However, I can see there's a pretty strong conflict on the name -
> https://kava.io/
> 
> John
> 
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:43 AM Serge Huber  wrote:
> 
>> I agree that it doesn't matter if it "meant" something, you can simply
>> forget the original meaning.
>> 
>> So it could mean "Cryptographic Java"
>> 
>> Here are other suggestions, because I like have the block and/or in the
>> name :)
>> 
>> - Blockava
>> - Blockva
>> - Chainava
>> 
>> Please note I didn't do any proper name search for the above :)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Serge...
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:32 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Consensus Java :)
>>> 
 On Feb 16, 2019, at 1:59 PM, Antoine Toulme 
>> wrote:
 
 I explained it in the proposal and the original thread, Cava stands
>> for “ConsenSys Java”, after Guava.
 
 It’s not a bad name per se, so let’s add it to the proposals.
 
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Henry Saputra 
>> wrote:
> 
> From last thread, I was not sure why Cava was not a suitable name?
> 
> If there is a concern about trademarked name, the community can
>> always go
> with Apache Cava name.
> 
> - Henry
> 
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 5:21 PM Antoine Toulme > wrote:
> 
>> Thank you Anu.
>> 
>> I’ll add your proposal to mine and start a vote Monday if that’s
>> agreeable.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Antoine
>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:03 PM, Anu Engineer <
>> aengin...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would like to suggest “Jal”, in reference to Indra’s net (or Indra
>> jal) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra%27s_net
>>> 
>>> From the link:
>>> "Imagine a multidimensional spider's web in the early morning
>> covered
>> with dew drops. And every dew drop contains the reflection of all
>> the other
>> dew drops.
>>> And, in each reflected dew drop, the reflections of all the other
>> dew
>> drops in that reflection. And so ad infinitum. That is the Buddhist
>> conception of the universe in an image." –Alan Watts[1]
>>> 
>>> And for what it is worth, it is the ultimate connected chain or
>> graph (
>>> 
>>> --Anu
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2/13/19, 10:58 AM, "Antoine Toulme"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> As discussed previously, Cava is not a proper name for the proposal
>> discussed last week on this list and published to the wiki [0].
>>> 

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

[Jim Jagielski]

Ah yes... agreed.

> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:33 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
> Jim,
> 
> The potential conflict is a small San Francisco blockchain software comp[any 
> called kava.io .
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
>> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 keeping as-is.
>> 
>>> On Feb 18, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>>> 
>>> First, a heartfelt thank you to all for participating in this discussion.
>>> 
>>> I am tempted to keep Cava _for now_ given this late feedback, and proceed 
>>> to proposing the project.
>>> To be more precise, I recommend we get the project into the incubator with 
>>> this name. We can change the name of the project 3 to 6 months in.
>>> 
>>> We have so far received significant interest from the Apache community and 
>>> others, and it looks like we can go from there.
>>> 
>>> John, good point on this website, kava.io. I note the company is named Kava 
>>> Labs Inc. and their GitHub is Kava-Labs.
>>> https://github.com/Kava-Labs
>>> It also looks like their code is in the crypto domain, but more on the 
>>> interchange/wallet side and written in Go and TypeScript.
>>> I’ll add them to the list when performing the suitable name search item on 
>>> Jira.
>>> 
>>> I am going to give everyone 48 hours to voice strong opinions against this 
>>> approach.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Antoine
>>> 
 On Feb 18, 2019, at 9:04 AM, John D. Ament  wrote:
 
 If the project is already known as Cava and is looking to move to Apache, I
 would recommend starting off as Cava.  I can see that there's already a
 presence for it - https://github.com/ConsenSys/cava
 
 However, I can see there's a pretty strong conflict on the name -
 https://kava.io/
 
 John
 
 On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:43 AM Serge Huber  wrote:
 
> I agree that it doesn't matter if it "meant" something, you can simply
> forget the original meaning.
> 
> So it could mean "Cryptographic Java"
> 
> Here are other suggestions, because I like have the block and/or in the
> name :)
> 
> - Blockava
> - Blockva
> - Chainava
> 
> Please note I didn't do any proper name search for the above :)
> 
> Regards,
> Serge...
> 
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:32 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> Consensus Java :)
>> 
>>> On Feb 16, 2019, at 1:59 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I explained it in the proposal and the original thread, Cava stands
> for “ConsenSys Java”, after Guava.
>>> 
>>> It’s not a bad name per se, so let’s add it to the proposals.
>>> 
 On Feb 16, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
 
 From last thread, I was not sure why Cava was not a suitable name?
 
 If there is a concern about trademarked name, the community can
> always go
 with Apache Cava name.
 
 - Henry
 
 On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 5:21 PM Antoine Toulme  wrote:
 
> Thank you Anu.
> 
> I’ll add your proposal to mine and start a vote Monday if that’s
> agreeable.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antoine
> 
>> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:03 PM, Anu Engineer <
> aengin...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>> 
>> I would like to suggest “Jal”, in reference to Indra’s net (or Indra
> jal) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra%27s_net
>> 
>> From the link:
>> "Imagine a multidimensional spider's web in the early morning
> covered
> with dew drops. And every dew drop contains the reflection of all
> the other
> dew drops.
>> And, in each reflected dew drop, the reflections of all the other
> dew
> drops in that reflection. And so ad infinitum. That is the Buddhist
> conception of the universe in an image." –Alan Watts[1]
>> 
>> And for what it is worth, it is the ultimate connected chain or
> graph (
>> 
>> --Anu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/13/19, 10:58 AM, "Antoine Toulme"  wrote:
>> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> As discussed previously, Cava is not a proper name for the proposal
> discussed last week on this list and published to the wiki [0].
>> 
>> I humbly would like to ask the community for feedback and proposals
> on a suitable name for this proposal, in line with the guidelines
> [1].
>> 
>> In preparation for this search, I have put together a list of
> names:
>> 
>> - Rainbow (after the name of my kid’s favorite toy, and in line
> with
> the crypto community unicorn punk theme [2].
>> - Winch (a mechanical device used to wind up or wind out wires
> (Wikipedia) , in the chain theme)
>> - Sprocket (a 

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

[VP Brand]

Wearing my VP, Brand Management hat:

The fields of use are sufficiently close that I would not be prepared to
approve the use of Apache Cava as a project name.

I strongly recommend that a new name for the project is chosen *before*
the podling is created as renames create large amounts of work for our
Infrastructure team.

That said, if the project wants to keep the Cava name then there are
options:

1. If Kava agree to the use of the name Cava and a co-existence
agreement is signed then I would be willing to approve the name.

2. You can appeal my decision to the ASF President (and ultimately to
the Board).

Mark
VP, Brand Management



On 19/02/2019 22:33, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Jim,
> 
> The potential conflict is a small San Francisco blockchain software comp[any 
> called kava.io .
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
>> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> +1 keeping as-is.
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Antoine Toulme  wrote:
>>>
>>> First, a heartfelt thank you to all for participating in this discussion.
>>>
>>> I am tempted to keep Cava _for now_ given this late feedback, and proceed 
>>> to proposing the project.
>>> To be more precise, I recommend we get the project into the incubator with 
>>> this name. We can change the name of the project 3 to 6 months in.
>>>
>>> We have so far received significant interest from the Apache community and 
>>> others, and it looks like we can go from there.
>>>
>>> John, good point on this website, kava.io. I note the company is named Kava 
>>> Labs Inc. and their GitHub is Kava-Labs.
>>> https://github.com/Kava-Labs
>>> It also looks like their code is in the crypto domain, but more on the 
>>> interchange/wallet side and written in Go and TypeScript.
>>> I’ll add them to the list when performing the suitable name search item on 
>>> Jira.
>>>
>>> I am going to give everyone 48 hours to voice strong opinions against this 
>>> approach.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
 On Feb 18, 2019, at 9:04 AM, John D. Ament  wrote:

 If the project is already known as Cava and is looking to move to Apache, I
 would recommend starting off as Cava.  I can see that there's already a
 presence for it - https://github.com/ConsenSys/cava

 However, I can see there's a pretty strong conflict on the name -
 https://kava.io/

 John

 On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:43 AM Serge Huber  wrote:

> I agree that it doesn't matter if it "meant" something, you can simply
> forget the original meaning.
>
> So it could mean "Cryptographic Java"
>
> Here are other suggestions, because I like have the block and/or in the
> name :)
>
> - Blockava
> - Blockva
> - Chainava
>
> Please note I didn't do any proper name search for the above :)
>
> Regards,
> Serge...
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:32 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> Consensus Java :)
>>
>>> On Feb 16, 2019, at 1:59 PM, Antoine Toulme 
> wrote:
>>>
>>> I explained it in the proposal and the original thread, Cava stands
> for “ConsenSys Java”, after Guava.
>>>
>>> It’s not a bad name per se, so let’s add it to the proposals.
>>>
 On Feb 16, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Henry Saputra 
> wrote:

 From last thread, I was not sure why Cava was not a suitable name?

 If there is a concern about trademarked name, the community can
> always go
 with Apache Cava name.

 - Henry

 On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 5:21 PM Antoine Toulme  wrote:

> Thank you Anu.
>
> I’ll add your proposal to mine and start a vote Monday if that’s
> agreeable.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:03 PM, Anu Engineer <
> aengin...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to suggest “Jal”, in reference to Indra’s net (or Indra
> jal) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra%27s_net
>>
>> From the link:
>> "Imagine a multidimensional spider's web in the early morning
> covered
> with dew drops. And every dew drop contains the reflection of all
> the other
> dew drops.
>> And, in each reflected dew drop, the reflections of all the other
> dew
> drops in that reflection. And so ad infinitum. That is the Buddhist
> conception of the universe in an image." –Alan Watts[1]
>>
>> And for what it is worth, it is the ultimate connected chain or
> graph (
>>
>> --Anu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/13/19, 10:58 AM, "Antoine Toulme"  wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> As discussed previously, Cava is not a proper name for the proposal
> discussed last week on this list and published to the wiki [0].

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

[Dmitriy Pavlov]

Hi Lars,

Thank you for proposing and driving this topic.

Surely, we can wait, but I'm absolutely sure more committers gives a
greater variety of technical visions. Moreover, we didn't change anything
essential in the proposal. I'm pretty sure a number of contributors may and
will come later.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

ср, 20 февр. 2019 г. в 10:58, Lars Francke :

> The vote for accepting "Training" into the Apache Incubator passes* with 21
> binding +1 votes, 6 non-binding +1 votes and no other votes.
> * Because of the late addition of Jim to the Proposal I'll leave everyone
> another 24h to object (we are in no rush) before I'll go and make this
> official.
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> 21 binding +1 votes:
> Bernd Fondermann
> Bertrand Delacretaz
> Christofer Dutz
> Felix Cheung
> Furkan Kamaci
> .
> Henry Saputra
> Jim Jagielski
> Justin Mclean
> Kenneth Knowles
> Kevin A. McGrail
> .
> Lars Francke
> Liang Chen
> Matt Sicker
> Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
> Myrle Krantz
> .
> Paul King
> Sharan Foga
> Thomas Weise
> Vinayakumar B
> Von Gosling
> .
> Woonsan Ko
>
>
> 6 non-binding +1 votes:
> Brahma Reddy Battula
> Ciprian Borodescu
> Dmitriy Pavlov
> Hans-Peter Zorn
> Julian Feinauer
> .
> Sönke Liebau
>
>
> Thank you everyone,
> Lars
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:57 AM Lars Francke 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The
> > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
> >
> > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the
> > new "Training" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> >
> > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote.
> > Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
> > It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment stating
> > whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
> >
> > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it open
> > for longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept Training into the Apache Incubator
> > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept Training into the Apache Incubator because ...
> >
> > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past discussions!
> > Lars
> >
> > [1] <
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5c00016b769135cc302bb2ce4e5f6bbfeeda933a07e9c38b5017d651@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > >
> >
> > [2] <
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cb4d7eef73e0d526e0124944c3d37325aa892675351a1eed0a25de3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > >
> >
> > [3] 
> >
> > [4] <
> >
> https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#approval_of_proposal_by_sponsor
> > >
> >
>