Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Rya (incubating) as a TLP
Hi, 5 of the proposed PMC members are from Parsons, all others have different affiliations (different from Parsons and different from each other). Thanks, Adina On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:50 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Just out of interest what is the diversity (in terms of company > affiliation) of the proposed PMC like? > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Dr. Adina Crainiceanu Associate Professor Computer Science Department United States Naval Academy 410-293-6822 ad...@usna.edu http://www.usna.edu/Users/cs/adina/
Incubator podling reports due today
Hi, Reports are due today, and these podlings are still yet to report and I cannot see a report being worked on: Amaterasu* Marvin-AI Omid PonyMail SINGA Spot Superset Tamaya* Taverna Tephra Warble * did not report last month. Good to see Toree reports who didn't report last month. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP
If SIGNA started as a university project, which is likely, I think the university should sign SGA. I'm a mentor of Nemo (donated from a university project). I helped the Nemo community file SGA. Best, Gon On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alan Gates wrote: > If I understand correctly, anytime software is brought into Apache as part > of the incubating process there must be documentation from the previous > owner of that software stating that they are donating it to Apache. > Without that Apache's ownership of the code is not clear. Justin, Dave, > others, please correct me if this understanding is wrong. > > And clearly there was code imported into Apache when Singa entered the > incubator, since an existing github link (now defunct) is referenced in > Singa's incubator proposal[1]. > > So I don't believe that an affirmation from PPMC that no docs are necessary > is sufficient. I believe we need a code grant from whoever owned that code > previously. > > Alan. > > 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/SingaProposal see > the section on initial source. > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:29 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no > need > > > for SGA. > > > > The link referred to doesn't give a reason why one is not required. Why > > was it decided that it wasn’t needed? Even if it not required (which I’m > > not 100% sure that is the case), would it be difficult to get one? If so > > why is that? > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > -- Byung-Gon Chun
Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaObjects for Apache Incubator
Hi, > Cengage wishes to donate the code to Apache, but is unable to do so until the > project is accepted as an Incubator project. Could you expand a little on why is that? > The Apache community members looking to approve the project understandably > would like to better understand what they are approving and so would like to > get access to the code which is to be donated. I don’t see this a being a big issue, the other code can be donated later, but may complicate things in terms of SGAs, ICLAs and IP provenance. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Rya (incubating) as a TLP
Hi, Just out of interest what is the diversity (in terms of company affiliation) of the proposed PMC like? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP
If I understand correctly, anytime software is brought into Apache as part of the incubating process there must be documentation from the previous owner of that software stating that they are donating it to Apache. Without that Apache's ownership of the code is not clear. Justin, Dave, others, please correct me if this understanding is wrong. And clearly there was code imported into Apache when Singa entered the incubator, since an existing github link (now defunct) is referenced in Singa's incubator proposal[1]. So I don't believe that an affirmation from PPMC that no docs are necessary is sufficient. I believe we need a code grant from whoever owned that code previously. Alan. 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/SingaProposal see the section on initial source. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:29 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no need > > for SGA. > > The link referred to doesn't give a reason why one is not required. Why > was it decided that it wasn’t needed? Even if it not required (which I’m > not 100% sure that is the case), would it be difficult to get one? If so > why is that? > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaObjects for Apache Incubator
Justin, I'm running into a bit of chicken/egg problem in terms of process for donating source code. To frame the problem: Part of the code is already released as open-source, which is available in the github repository. Part of the code is yet to be released since it was developed internally by Cengage. Cengage wishes to donate the code to Apache, but is unable to do so until the project is accepted as an Incubator project. The Apache community members looking to approve the project understandably would like to better understand what they are approving and so would like to get access to the code which is to be donated. I'm sure you've seen similar issues in the past and I'm looking for some advice/options to be able to move forward. --carl From: Justin Mclean Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 4:35 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaObjects for Apache Incubator Hi, > Currently most development is happening within Cengage. The core library > hasn't changed much, aside from some bug fixes. Most of the recent > innovation has occurred in other libraries built upon the draagon-metaobjects > foundations. That code is part of what is proposed to be donated to the apache-metaobjects project. Thanks for that, I still a little unclear what code base is being donated. I’m just asking as that may make the IP transfers process easier or harder, you might have to get ICLA from people who have worked on it in the past for instance. > Regarding the mentor list, I saw the Apache committer list included Heath, > but misunderstood that being a committer did not imply ASF membership, which > was my mistake. However, Johan Edstrom and James Carman are members of the > IPMC, and Jamie mentioned to me that he has requested IPMC membership as well. In addition, James has mentored a few projects in the past. We would welcome another mentor if anyone is interested in helping build a community around the project. I think it would be best for a project if you had an mentor with some more experience. It can be difficult if you mentors go missing or if they may not be familiar with recent changes in infrastructure or the incubator. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Rya (incubating) as a TLP
As one of their mentors, the community as been doing a great job of steering themselves for some time now (year+). I've prodded them a bit to start this process, and I'm super excited to see them working towards graduation now. They have my +1 - Josh On 8/31/19 7:16 PM, Adina Crainiceanu wrote: The Apache Rya (incubating) community would like to start the discussion on general@ about graduating to a top level project. -We completed all the tasks documented in the status file [1] -The name Apache Rya was approved by the Brand Management COmmittee [2] -We had four Apache releases with three different release managers -Our community grew during incubation and we learned to function following the Apache Way -We discussed on the dev@ list about our readiness for graduation [3], we voted [4], and the result of the vote was positive [5] -We went through the process of assessing our project against the Apache Maturity model [6] and we believe we are ready to graduate and continue to grow as a Top Level Project. -We worked on creating a graduation resolution and we selected a Chair [7]. The draft resolution is appended below. Please provide your opinion on whether Rya is ready to graduate to a top level project. Thank you, Adina, on behalf of Apache Rya (incubating) community [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/rya.html [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-135 [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd09c2060a754e69e093404e0d57239a555ab5e7d702cf76fd02f820@%3Cdev.rya.apache.org%3E [4] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/10f04a55e0f6d4c09d3ffeac487b0bf309eb8e5058f950778214faeb@%3Cdev.rya.apache.org%3E [5] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1664b17d8a6bf3d3e4e5f28382bc360fe974f1db8f880c6d97ff278@%3Cdev.rya.apache.org%3E [6] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RYA/Apache+Maturity+Evaluation+for+Rya [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3007163bc654df45109c38b4d9a53c7b2137ad0fef660429938a282b@%3Cprivate.rya.apache.org%3E Proposed graduation resolution: Establish the Apache Rya Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to scalable storage, retrieval, and analysis of RDF data. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Rya Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Rya Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to scalable storage, retrieval, and analysis of RDF data; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Rya" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Rya Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Rya Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Rya Project: * Aaron Mihalik * Adina Crainiceanu * Billie Rinaldi * Caleb Meier * David Lotts * David Rapp * Jennifer Brown * Josh Elser * Puja Valiyil * Roshan Punnoose * Steve R Wagner NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Adina Crainiceanu be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Rya, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Rya Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Rya podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Rya podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects
Thanks, that’s clear enough for me. > 在 2019年9月3日，19:10，Justin Mclean 写道： > > Hi, > >> There is another question during the donation. If some contributors of the >> donated code repo already signed ICLA in other projects, do they have to >> submit ICLA again for the new project? My understanding is that they don’t. > > Correct, they do not, one ICLA for the ASF is enough, it’s not required per > project or per donation. > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects
Hi, > There is another question during the donation. If some contributors of the > donated code repo already signed ICLA in other projects, do they have to > submit ICLA again for the new project? My understanding is that they don’t. Correct, they do not, one ICLA for the ASF is enough, it’s not required per project or per donation. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: IP Clearance Process for Incubating projects
Thanks. There is another question during the donation. If some contributors of the donated code repo already signed ICLA in other projects, do they have to submit ICLA again for the new project? My understanding is that they don’t. Best Regards, York Shen 申远 > 在 2019年9月2日，23:54，Matt Sicker 写道： > > Don’t forget to file the forms with the secretary. > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 04:53, York Shen wrote: > >>> Just to be clear the ICLAs need to be be from all the contributors, not >> just one person. >> >> Understood, that’s why I use plural form of ICLAs. >> >> I shall collected ICLAs/SGAs and send them to the mailing list by the end >> of this weekend if everything is fine. But I’m confused about what I shall >> do next to transfer those Git repo to ASF, maybe creating a JIRA issue to >> INFRA? >> >> Best Regards, >> York Shen >> >> 申远 >> >>> 在 2019年9月2日，17:43，Justin Mclean 写道： >>> >>> Just to be clear the ICLAs need to be be from all the contributors, not >> just one person. >> >> -- > Matt Sicker
Adding two new committers to Apache Druid (incubating)
Apache Druid (incubating) PMC voted to accept two new committers: Fokko Driesprong ( https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/druid-private/201909.mbox/%3CCAAMLo%3Da-zYUdQdfvAKX7F-DnO%3Do0uySmwfyjmd6gfaRC-W4Q%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com%3E) and Furkan Kamaci ( https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/druid-private/201909.mbox/%3CCAAMLo%3DZRW_5FaUQsSq%3D-7fThQJPujX-UR67_dpzzH3JSUEVhxg%40mail.gmail.com%3E). They are committers to other Apache projects (their Apache IDs are fokko and kamaci, respectively). I think we now need assistance from the Incubator PMC Chair to grant them access to Druid's repositories: incubator-druid, incubator-druid-website, and incubator-druid-website-src. Thanks.
