Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

2019-09-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

I just took a look at the Sign incubator report and it needs some  improvement. 
If you were a TLP if and a report like this was submitted to the board, it 
would likely be rejected, or attract questions. I suggest you add a bit more 
meaningful detail to the report.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Incubator podling reports due today

2019-09-04 Thread Dave Fisher



> On Sep 4, 2019, at 3:50 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thursday morning here and still to report are:
> Amaterasu*
> Hivemall
> Iceberg
> Marvin-AI
> Omid**
> SINGA
> Superset
> Tamaya*
> Taverna
> Tephra
> Warble

Warble just reported….

> 
> * did not report last month. 
> 
> A couple of the reports need more detail and may be rejected, I’ll contact 
> the podlings individually.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Incubator podling reports due today

2019-09-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

Thursday morning here and still to report are:
Amaterasu*
Hivemall
Iceberg
Marvin-AI
Omid**
SINGA
Superset
Tamaya*
Taverna
Tephra
Warble

* did not report last month. 

A couple of the reports need more detail and may be rejected, I’ll contact the 
podlings individually.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: What is the best tool to scan the code?

2019-09-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi,

1. ossindex from sonatype covers a lot
2. not sure what you means, findbugs or more checkstyle/pmd?
3. rat plugin for example (see apache creadur tools too, there are license
tools). Also note that with the initial dep review + review of the license
each time a new dep is added in standard asf review flow you rarely need to
scan them actually.
4. you can also check binary only contains your code + deps so no need to
rescan in such a case.

Blackduck is good but does not scale well for huge projects (> 60 modules)
and is not free, sourceclear is also a not that bad alternative but is not
free too I think.

My 2cts being that the previous setup works well for asf projects, stays
free and integrated to the build (compared to blackduck or sourceclear
which are using two steps/async process as solutions).

Hope it helps

Le mer. 4 sept. 2019 à 23:13, Xun Hu  a écrit :

> We would like to scan our code to:
> 1) dependency analysis
> 2) snippet matching
> 3) license analysis
> 4) binary analysis  - optional
>
> We found one paid solution - black duck, not sure there is any open source
> solution on the market.
>
> Thanks,
> -xun
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Mclean 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 1:59 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: What is the best tool to scan the code?
>
> HI,
>
> > We have one open source project, and I would like to find a tool to scan
> the code before we open it.
>
> Sorry but it unclear to me, what you what to scan the code for.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: What is the best tool to scan the code?

2019-09-04 Thread Justin Mclean
HI,

> We would like to scan our code to:
> 1) dependency analysis

Most build tools can do this.

> 2) snippet matching

I don’t know of any open source project that does this, but that not to say 
ones doesn’t exist.

> 3) license analysis

Apache Rat is a simple tool that can help with this, if you want something more 
detailed try Fossology.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



RE: What is the best tool to scan the code?

2019-09-04 Thread Xun Hu
We would like to scan our code to:
1) dependency analysis
2) snippet matching
3) license analysis
4) binary analysis  - optional

We found one paid solution - black duck, not sure there is any open source 
solution on the market.

Thanks,
-xun

-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean  
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 1:59 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the best tool to scan the code?

HI,

> We have one open source project, and I would like to find a tool to scan the 
> code before we open it.

Sorry but it unclear to me, what you what to scan the code for.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: What is the best tool to scan the code?

2019-09-04 Thread Justin Mclean
HI,

> We have one open source project, and I would like to find a tool to scan the 
> code before we open it.

Sorry but it unclear to me, what you what to scan the code for.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Is it safe to include valgrind.h?

2019-09-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

It’s under a Category A license so would be safe to include, however that then 
gives you a dependancy on a Category X bit of software which is not normally 
allowed.

Is valgrind needed by all users or is it optional?

Thanks,
Justin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Rya (incubating) as a TLP

2019-09-04 Thread Julian Hyde
I’ve been monitoring Rya for a few years now. The project seems to have a 
steady level of activity from diverse contributors, operating according to the 
Apache Way. +1 to graduate, good luck!

Julian


> On Sep 3, 2019, at 6:27 PM, Adina Crainiceanu  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 5 of the proposed PMC members are from Parsons, all others have different
> affiliations (different from Parsons and different from each other).
> Thanks,
> Adina
> 
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:50 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just out of interest what is the diversity (in terms of company
>> affiliation) of the proposed PMC like?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Adina Crainiceanu
> Associate Professor
> Computer Science Department
> United States Naval Academy
> 410-293-6822
> ad...@usna.edu
> http://www.usna.edu/Users/cs/adina/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



What is the best tool to scan the code?

2019-09-04 Thread Xun Hu
Hi, all,

We have one open source project, and I would like to find a tool to scan the 
code before we open it.

What is the best tool you can recommend to us?

Best,
-xun



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Is it safe to include valgrind.h?

2019-09-04 Thread tan zhongyi
Hi, guys, 

We have included one file named as valgrind.h under brpc’s source code.


https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/blob/master/src/butil/third_party/valgrind/LICENSE

https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/blob/master/src/butil/third_party/valgrind/valgrind.h

According to its license statement,   valgrind.h is released under BSD 
style license,
Other part of valgrind is released under GPL v2.

But we only include valgrind.h and its license file.

And I also get its original version as
https://github.com/svn2github/valgrind/blob/master/include/valgrind.h

we will include both valgrind.h and its LICENSE in our next apache release.

So it looks that it is safe for us to include valgrind.h and its License in 
brpc’s source tarball,
right?

Please help us to confirm, thanks







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org