Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.4.0-incubating (RC1)
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - LICENSE and NOTICE all good - No unexpected binary files - All ASF headers have correct headers - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 [RC2]
Hi, +1 (binding) but more work in needed on headers and licensing I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK but not complete. The restrictions of use conditions will need to be addressed at some point. - File are missing ASF headers - No unexpected binaries - didn’t compile from source Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2
Justin - I think you misread the comments. These comments specifically address *externally* available pre-packaged configuration that is NOT included in the release. Here's the full comment in question: # # This is the default configuration. Feel free to add to and extend it. # # You can also download pre-packaged configuration that is based on the content # licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) # from https://nlpcraft.apache.org/download.html#3rd_party_config # # NOTE: these external pre-packaged configurations are not part of the official # Apache source release due to CC BY 4.0 licensing. # I hope that clarifies that. Thanks, -- Nikita Ivanov On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:49 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) due to license and binary issues > > I checked: > - Incubating in name > - signatures and hashes are fine > - DISCLAIMER exists > - NOTICE include lists MIT licensed file this should be in LICENSE. This > was brought up last release. > - LICENSE is missing above MIT license > - Release include code with incompatibles licenses (see below) > - Looks like there are compiled binaries in the source release [1] > - Can compile from source > > I see a number of issues here file have been include that should not be as > they contain: > "NOTE: these external pre-packaged configurations are not part of the > official > # Apache source release due to CC BY 4.0 licensing.” > > That are include in the source release. > > Files include: > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/spell/dictionary.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/metro.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/continents.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/synonyms/states.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/synonyms/case_sensitive/list.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/synonyms/list.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/exceptions/dict.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/us_top.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/countries/GB.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/countries/US.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/countries/RU.yaml > ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/geo/world_top.yaml > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. ./nlpcraft/src/main/resources/opennlp/en-*.bin > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.4.0-incubating (RC1)
Carry on my +1 (binding) from the dev vote thread. On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:22 AM Luciano Resende wrote: > > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.4.0-incubating (RC1). > > The podling dev vote thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg02117.html > > And the result: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg02133.html > > Tag: v0.4.0-incubating-rc1 (b2374e28ce66ae28079703d725b7c0db4d4a) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/tree/v0.4.0-incubating-rc1 > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.4.0-incubating-rc1/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetoree-1016 > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.3.0-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2
Hi, > Justin - I think you misread the comments. These comments specifically > address *externally* available pre-packaged configuration that is NOT > included in the release. Here's the full comment in question: Those files still contain data, which I’m guessing is a subset of full set? If so that subset would still be under CC BY 4.0 and not allowed in a source release in this form. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2
No, those files were created completely from scratch without any borrowing from any CC-based sources (thus they are very minimal and serve more of documentation purpose on how to extend them). All content of the files shipped in the release is 100% ASL2.0 licensed. Thanks, -- Nikita Ivanov On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:22 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Justin - I think you misread the comments. These comments specifically > > address *externally* available pre-packaged configuration that is NOT > > included in the release. Here's the full comment in question: > > Those files still contain data, which I’m guessing is a subset of full > set? If so that subset would still be under CC BY 4.0 and not allowed in a > source release in this form. > > Thanks, > Justin > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2
Hi, And the binary files? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0
Hi all, The vote to release Apache NuttX (incubating) 9.1.0-rc2 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. The release has passed with 5 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Justin Mclean +1 Duo Zhang +1 Junping +1 ShaoFeng Shi +1 Tianqi Chen Non-Binding +1 Nathan Hartman +1 Xiang Xiao Vote thread https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/r578bcb9306efcc43b06c248cea9518773104decb7223d04a3b80176d@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E We will proceed with the official release of 9.1.0. Thank you everyone for reviewing this and we hear the comments on the license headers, we are working through migrating more of them as we can, and all new contributions are using the ASF Apache 2.0 License header. --Brennan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2
Will be removed in the next release (0.7.0) [1], as well as adding MIT to LICENSE file [2]. Thank you, 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-98 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NLPCRAFT-97 -- Nikita Ivanov On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:12 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > And the binary files? > > Thanks, > Justin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
