?????? [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of HugeGraph

2022-01-12 Thread Imba Jin 
Thanks to the concern for the release with HugeGraph Toolchain repo, after 
listened to the dev & user voice, we think merge them to one  will 
help the community work/contribute for them better. (Due to their function is 
similar & users don't need to download multiple repos)


And regard to the issue of release, we intend to gradually unify the version 
number. At first, the version of client module may change separately, but 
eventually we use one version for toolchain to avoid these problems. (means 
they will be released together)


Any relevant suggestions are also welcome to discuss.





--  --
??: 
   "general"

https://github.com/orgs/hugegraph/repositories
> > > [2]
> > 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
> > > (section
> > > #Initial Source)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > Jermy Li | Senior Software Engineer @Baidu
> > >
> > > javalov...@gmail.com https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph
> > > > 2. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-computer
> > > > 3. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-commons
> > > > 4. [PLAN] The ecosystem repository hugegraph-toolchain, 
including
> > > > hugegraph-client, hugegraph-loader, hugegraph-tools, 
hugegraph-hubble,
> > > > hugegraph-test, hugegraph-doc:
> > > > https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-toolchain
> > > > ```
> > > > Double-check here, All the relevant repos at Github will be 
donated to
> > > > ASF, right? @Jermy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
> > > >
> > > >
> > 
--
> > > > Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 01/7/2022 01:12??Dave Fisherhttps://medium.com/@jermylee/comparison-of-graph-database-neo4j-janusgrraph-and-hugegraph-b144c527a6e2
> > > > <
> > > >
> > 
https://medium.com/@jermylee/comparison-of-graph-database-neo4j-janusgrraph-and-hugegraph-b144c527a6e2
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Jermy Li | Senior Software Engineer @Baidu
> > > > javalov...@gmail.com ;
> > > > Lidong Dai mailto:lidong...@apache.org>>;
> > > > ??2022??1??4?? 22:56??
> > > > I'm so glad to see that HugeGraph will enter into the 
Apache Incubator!
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy to be the mentor of the project.  As far as 
I know, HugeGraph
> > > > initial team has done a lot of work for this project.
> > > >
> > > > BTW,  our new project also need a graph database, I 
think HugeGraph is
> > a
> > > > good choice
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair
> > > > LidongDai
> > > > lidong...@apache.org ;
> > > > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dailidong <
> > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/dailidong>;
> > > > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy  > > > https://twitter.com/WorkflowEasy>>;
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:02 PM Yu Li https://blog.actorsfit.com/a?ID=01650-caeae70a-01c9-4ab8-a440-07b24e732ee7
> > > > <
> > > >
> > 
https://blog.actorsfit.com/a?ID=01650-caeae70a-01c9-4ab8-a440-07b24e732ee7
> > > > >
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > 
https://hugegraph.github.io/hugegraph-doc/performance/hugegraph-benchmark-0.5.6.html
> > > > <
> > > >
> > 
https://hugegraph.github.io/hugegraph-doc/performance/hugegraph-benchmark-0.5.6.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 16:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofr?? 
mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>; wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Willem,
> > > >
> > > > it looks like an interesting project.
> > > >
> > > > Just for my curiosity, how can we compare HugeGraph with 
Neo4j, Titan,
> > > > or PostgreSQL AGE ?
> > > > Especially in term of graph distribution, parallel 
processing, etc ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks !
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > On 04/01/2022 03:27, Willem Jiang wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > First happy new year to everyone!
> > > >
> > > > We want to propose HugeGraph[1]  as a new Apache 
Incubator project.
> > > >
> > > > HugeGraph is a large-scale and easy-to-use graph database. 
In the case
> > > > of 100+ billion data (vertices and edges), HugeGraph has 
complete
> > > > HTAP[2] capabilities built in its internal system. The 
design goal of
> > > > HugeGraph is to achieve a balance between availability, 
performance
> > > > and cost.
> > > >
> > > > I'd be happy to be the Champion of this project and may 
Thanks to
> > > > Trista Pan (panjuan at apache dot org)??Lidong Dai 
(lidongdai at apache
> > > > dot org)??Xiangdong Huang (hxd at apache dot org)??Yu Li 
(liyu at apache
> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Justin Mclean 
Hi,

Looking at the source jar at [1] it contains the Apache 2.0 license and the non 
generated source files files have Apache headers so I think we can say this is 
OK.

Kind Regards,
Justin

1. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/stax/stax/1.2.0/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of HugeGraph

2022-01-12 Thread Calvin Kirs 
Hi,
Looks like a nice project.
BTW, the mailing list is best to use x...@hugegraph.apache.org.

Willem Jiang  于2022年1月11日周二 20:21写道：

> Hi Jermy,
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
> If hugegraph-studio is going to retire, I think it's OK if we just
> include hugegraph-hubble in the hugegraph-toolchain.
>
> Another quick question， if we put hugegraph-client, hugegraph-loader,
> hugegraph-tools, hugegraph-hubble, hugegraph-test, hugegraph-doc in to
> the hugegraph-toolchain, it may cause some trouble when doing the
> release.  We may still need to figure out a way to transfer those
> repos.
>
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 7:39 PM Jermy Li  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Willem,
> >
> > hugegrahp-studio is an outdated UI project, which is replaced by a new
> > version of UI project hugegrahp-hubble.
> > Of course we can also merge hugegrahp-studio into hugegraph-toolchain if
> > necessary.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Jermy Li | Senior Software Engineer @Baidu
> >
> > javalov...@gmail.com 
> >
> > Willem Jiang  于2022年1月11日周二 18:35写道：
> >
> > > Hi Jermy,
> > >
> > > I just found you didn't mention the hugegraph-studio repo in the
> proposal.
> > > Can you explain more about it?
> > >
> > > Willem Jiang
> > >
> > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 5:27 PM Jermy Li  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Yes I'm sure all the relevant repos at GitHub/hugegraph [1] will be
> > > donated
> > > > to ASF.
> > > >
> > > > At present, there are more than 10 sub-projects. For the convenience
> of
> > > > management, we plan to merge them into 4 sub-projects [2].
> > > > Some demo projects may be ignored(like
> > > hugegraph-plugin-stanford-analyzer),
> > > > but all key projects will be donated.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/orgs/hugegraph/repositories
> > > > [2]
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
> > > > (section
> > > > #Initial Source)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jermy Li | Senior Software Engineer @Baidu
> > > >
> > > > javalov...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Juan Pan  于2022年1月7日周五 22:47写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Dave,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There are a few repos of HugeGraph at GitHub, it’s too loose and
> not
> > > easy
> > > > > to manage. So the team decides to merge some of repos into [1],
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ```
> > > > > 1. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph
> > > > > 2. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-computer
> > > > > 3. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-commons
> > > > > 4. [PLAN] The ecosystem repository hugegraph-toolchain, including
> > > > > hugegraph-client, hugegraph-loader, hugegraph-tools,
> hugegraph-hubble,
> > > > > hugegraph-test, hugegraph-doc:
> > > > > https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-toolchain
> > > > > ```
> > > > > Double-check here, All the relevant repos at Github will be
> donated to
> > > > > ASF, right? @Jermy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> --
> > > > > Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 01/7/2022 01:12，Dave Fisher wrote：
> > > > > Hi -
> > > > >
> > > > > Not every repository at GitHub.com/hugegraph is included in the
> > > proposal.
> > > > > What does the HugeGraph community intend to do with those
> > > repositories? Are
> > > > > any of those key to the project?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jan 4, 2022, at 9:47 AM, Jermy Li  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, I'm Jermy from HugeGraph team. Thanks to mentors for
> introducing
> > > the
> > > > > project.
> > > > >
> > > > > @JB
> > > > > We have sorted out a comparison(some main features of graph
> database)
> > > > > between
> > > > > HugeGraph and Neo4j + Titan/Janus, I'm glad to share with you:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > (I post a picture here due to the table format can't be displayed
> well
> > > in
> > > > > the email,
> > > > > please refer to this link[1] for a text version.)
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > >
> https://medium.com/@jermylee/comparison-of-graph-database-neo4j-janusgrraph-and-hugegraph-b144c527a6e2
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > >
> https://medium.com/@jermylee/comparison-of-graph-database-neo4j-janusgrraph-and-hugegraph-b144c527a6e2
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jermy Li | Senior Software Engineer @Baidu
> > > > > javalov...@gmail.com 
> > > > > Lidong Dai mailto:lidong...@apache.org>>
> > > > > 于2022年1月4日周二 22:56写道：
> > > > > I'm so glad to see that HugeGraph will enter into the Apache
> Incubator!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm happy to be the mentor of the project.  As far as I know,
> HugeGraph
> > > > > initial team has done a lot o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Calvin Kirs 
This is the license of his dependencies, but his own license is not clear,
I am not sure how to deal with this situation, but I think it has certain
risks, let us listen to other people's ideas

Mohammad Noureldin  于2022年1月12日周三 22:18写道：

> Hi,
>
> I hope this helps. Found this [1], there it states that it has a Compile
> Dependency (stax-api) with what it seems to be using Dual License:
> - CDDL 1.0
> - GPL
>
> That said, I believe it is fair to assume that stax 1.2.0 follows one, or
> both, of these 2 licenses.
>
> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/stax/stax/1.2.0
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:14 PM Calvin Kirs  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This does not mean that the historical version he published is compliant.
> >
> > Hans Van Akelyen  于2022年1月12日周三 20:07写道：
> >
> > > I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
> > >
> > > This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt
> > >
> > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Justin Mclean  于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a
> > > dependency
> > > > > of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
> > > > >
> > > > hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about,  stax: stax this version
> > does
> > > > not have a relevant license, although it is used by many projects.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just
> > > because
> > > > > it is a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it
> acceptable.
> > Do
> > > > we
> > > > > know how is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it
> > category X
> > > > > that would be an issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > Justin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best wishes！
> > > > CalvinKirs
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best  wishes！
> > CalvinKirs
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Noureldin
> 
> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
> - Albert Einstein
>


-- 
Best  wishes！
CalvinKirs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Mohammad Noureldin 
Hi,

I hope this helps. Found this [1], there it states that it has a Compile
Dependency (stax-api) with what it seems to be using Dual License:
- CDDL 1.0
- GPL

That said, I believe it is fair to assume that stax 1.2.0 follows one, or
both, of these 2 licenses.

[1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/stax/stax/1.2.0

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:14 PM Calvin Kirs  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This does not mean that the historical version he published is compliant.
>
> Hans Van Akelyen  于2022年1月12日周三 20:07写道：
>
> > I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
> >
> > This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hans
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs  wrote:
> >
> > > Justin Mclean  于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a
> > dependency
> > > > of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
> > > >
> > > hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about,  stax: stax this version
> does
> > > not have a relevant license, although it is used by many projects.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just
> > because
> > > > it is a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable.
> Do
> > > we
> > > > know how is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it
> category X
> > > > that would be an issue.
> > > >
> > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best wishes！
> > > CalvinKirs
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best  wishes！
> CalvinKirs
>


-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Noureldin

"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Calvin Kirs 
Hi,

This does not mean that the historical version he published is compliant.

Hans Van Akelyen  于2022年1月12日周三 20:07写道：

> I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]
>
> This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
> [1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs  wrote:
>
> > Justin Mclean  于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a
> dependency
> > > of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
> > >
> > hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about,  stax: stax this version does
> > not have a relevant license, although it is used by many projects.
> >
> > >
> > > The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just
> because
> > > it is a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do
> > we
> > > know how is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it category X
> > > that would be an issue.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Best wishes！
> > CalvinKirs
> >
>


-- 
Best  wishes！
CalvinKirs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Hans Van Akelyen 
I "think" it is ASF2 licensed [1]

This location seems to be a copy from their original svn/cvs code.

Cheers,
Hans

[1] https://github.com/codehaus/stax/blob/master/dev/ASF2.0.txt

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 12:52, Calvin Kirs  wrote:

> Justin Mclean  于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency
> > of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
> >
> hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about,  stax: stax this version does
> not have a relevant license, although it is used by many projects.
>
> >
> > The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just because
> > it is a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do
> we
> > know how is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it category X
> > that would be an issue.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best wishes！
> CalvinKirs
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Calvin Kirs 
Justin Mclean  于2022年1月12日周三 18:18写道：

>
> Hi,
>
> > stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency
> of com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license
>
hi, Justin, that's what I'm worried about,  stax: stax this version does
not have a relevant license, although it is used by many projects.

>
> The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just because
> it is a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do we
> know how is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it category X
> that would be an issue.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Best wishes！
CalvinKirs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Justin Mclean 


Hi,

> stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency of 
> com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license

The license of stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is what is relevant here, just because it is 
a dependancy of a MIT licensed jar doesn’t make it acceptable. Do we know how 
is it licensed? If it category A/B that fine, if it category X that would be an 
issue.

Kind Regards,
Justin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-12 Thread Leonid Frolov 
Hi,
stax:stax:jar:1.2.0 is not used directly by DataLab but as a dependency of 
com.azure:azure-identity:jar:1.3.0:compile that has MIT license 
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.azure/azure-identity/1.3.0
Which is acceptable according to 
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a as far as I understand.

Best regards,
Leonid Frolov

On 2022/01/07 07:46:25 Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> +0 (nonbinding)
> 
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes are fine
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
>   Need to update the NOTICE year in the next version
> - No unexpected binary files
> - all source files have ASF headers
> 
> - stax:stax:jar:1.2.0
> I did not find its license, I am not sure if it is compliant.
> 
> Justin Mclean  于2022年1月7日周五 13:14写道：
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I checked:
> > - incubating in name
> > - signatures and hashes are fine
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - all source files have ASF headers
> > - can compile from source
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Best  wishes！
> CalvinKirs
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org