Re: [VOTE] Accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator

2022-01-20 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 15, 2022, at 3:28 PM, Willem Jiang  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Hugegraph[1], I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator.
> 
> Please cast your vote:
> 
>  [ ] +1, bring Hugegraph into the Incubator
>  [ ] +0, I don't care either way
>  [ ] -1, do not bring Hugegraph into the Incubator, because...
> 
> The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> 
> Please check out the Hugegraph Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> 
> [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/31k4jsgmmfhl3vggnbko1rjsmqjymh29
> [2]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
> 
> Willem Jiang
> 
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator

2022-01-20 Thread Shuai Di
+1 (non-binding).
Good luck!

Shuai Di
Best Regards.


Furkan KAMACI  于2022年1月20日周四 21:16写道:

> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On 20 Jan 2022 Thu at 15:25 Willem Jiang  wrote:
>
> > My +1(binding)
> > Willem Jiang
> >
> > Twitter: willemjiang
> > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >
> > > On Jan 17, 2022, at 7:10 PM, heng du  wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Daniel Widdis  于2022年1月17日周一 18:11写道:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> On 1/15/22, 3:22 PM, "Willem Jiang"  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Hi all,
> > >>
> > >>Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Hugegraph[1], I would like to
> > >> call a
> > >>VOTE to accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator.
> > >>
> > >>Please cast your vote:
> > >>
> > >>  [ ] +1, bring Hugegraph into the Incubator
> > >>  [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > >>  [ ] -1, do not bring Hugegraph into the Incubator, because...
> > >>
> > >>The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> > >>Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> > >>
> > >>Please check out the Hugegraph Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> > >>
> > >>[1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/31k4jsgmmfhl3vggnbko1rjsmqjymh29
> > >>[2]
> > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
> > >>
> > >>Willem Jiang
> > >>
> > >>Twitter: willemjiang
> > >>Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > >>
> > >>
> -
> > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (incubator) 0.12.2

2022-01-20 Thread Xun Liu
Hi

+1 (binding) from me,

I have checked the following items:
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each YuniKorn repo.
- All links are valid
- No unexpected binary files
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- Build from source in macOS(Catalina)
- Built images(core、k8shim、web) with make
- Deployed into KIND using helm charts
- Startup and run some RESTful tests,
   calls healthcheck successed.

Xun Liu
Best Regards,

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:17 AM Craig Condit  wrote:

> I forgot to mention:
>
> During the last release vote references to Cloudera JIRAs were detected.
> YUNIKORN-987 has been filed and fixed to remove these references. This
> change has not been back ported to this patch release and the references
> will be removed in the next minor/major release.
>
> On 2022/01/19 16:52:54 Craig Condit wrote:
> > Hello IPMC
> >
> > The Apache YuniKorn community has voted and approved the release Apache
> > YuniKorn (incubating) 0.12.2. We now kindly request the IPMC members
> review
> > and vote in this release.
> >
> > YuniKorn is a standalone, universal resource scheduler that can support
> > both long-running and batch workloads. The current release provides a
> fully
> > functional resource scheduler for K8s.
> >
> > YuniKorn community vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gw0k0g5fy86r8ljnjttdco04w7z5j4j
> >
> > Vote result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kdgkzo1h7z6q21gbrhxsmxr8ovbfz8vv
> >
> > Issues included in this release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12351270
> >
> > The release candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/yunikorn/0.12.2-rc2/
> >
> > This release has been signed with a PGP available here:
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/yunikorn/KEYS
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> >  - https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-core/tree/v0.12.2-1
> >  - https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-k8shim/tree/v0.12.2-1
> >  -
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-scheduler-interface/tree/v0.12.2-1
> >  - https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-web/tree/v0.12.2-1
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes is reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release of Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.12.2
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please specify the reason)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Craig Condit
> > Apache YuniKorn (Incubating)
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

2022-01-20 Thread Mohammad Noureldin
Hi,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:18 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > Some source code files are cherry picked from that 'mxparser' library and
> > redistributed, both in Source and Binary forms, as part of that 'stax'
> > library.
>
> Which may be fine it just depends on the license of each file in question.
> Knowing where they are originally from is nice but not always needed.
>

I've seen that that legal JIRA [1] has been closed concluding that the
"Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software" license is category A ? Cool!


>
> > I am trying to reach out for this developer on LinkedIn.
>
> Which is good approach to take.
>

Tatu accepted my LinkedIn connection request which allowed me to see his
contact email. Did email him and here is his response:

>>> START <<<


> Hi Tatu,
>

Hi there!


>
> 1st of all thanks for accepting my connection request on LinkedIn.
>
> My name is Mohammad Noureldin, and I am a member of the Apache Software
> Foundation (ASF) [1] and it's Apache Incubator [2] community.
>
> We need your help shedding some lights on the license of a couple of
> source code files you've contributed to as part of the Stax library version
> 1.2.0 [3].
>
> I am referring to these specific 2 files:
> - com/bea/xml/stream/events/NotationDeclarationEvent.java
> - com/bea/xml/stream/events/EntityDeclarationEvent.java
>

Interesting. I never worked for BEA and do not recall their asking for
inclusion permissions.
(I would not have minded and would have given permission just fine -- I
just do not remember being asked)

I assume these must have come from the Woodstox library by copy-paste.
Woodstox is licensed under Apache License 2.0, and so should the
contributions be.


>
> Where we found these headers on both of them:
>
> /**
>  * Simple implementation of {@link NotationDeclaration}.
>  *
>  * @author Tatu Saloranta
>  */
>
> /**
>  * Simple implementation of {@link EntityDeclaration}. Since no external
>  * or unparsed entities are supported (yet?), this is quite simplistic
>  * implementation.
>  *
>  * @author Tatu Saloranta
>  */
>
> Knowing under which license your contributions were made will help us
> deciding on a release of one of our Incubator Projects [4], namely the
> Apache Datalab [5].
>
> The main issue arises from that we are not able to find under which
> license the whole library [3] is released. If you can shed some light on
> that as well, that would be great!
> Looking forward to your reply
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org
> [2] https://incubator.apache.org
> [3] https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/stax/stax/1.2.0/
> [4] https://lists.apache.org/thread/p755rqsttwjgk650xsoftotcwbm47omp
> [5] https://datalab.apache.org
>
> --
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Noureldin
>

Ok. So, contributions would have been made under Apache License 2.0.

Given that Stax API has been part of JDK since Java 6, it would probably
make sense to drop dependency to `stax-1.2.0`, however. Stax implementation
included therein is ancient and buggy, but might be used instead of
JDK-provided one. :)

I hope this helps,

-+ Tatu +-

>>> END <<<

I believe this concludes the questions over the license of Stax 1.2.0 ?
That at least all of the code of concern included is of Category A.

But question, given all the details we have now, can we safely say that
Stax 1.2.0 is AL v2.0 licensed ?

And a question to the Apache Datalab project community, is it possible in
future releases to look into getting rid of that outdated/old (transitive)
dependency ?


> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-592

-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Noureldin

"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein


Re: [VOTE] Accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator

2022-01-20 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi,

+1 (binding)

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

On 20 Jan 2022 Thu at 15:25 Willem Jiang  wrote:

> My +1(binding)
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> > On Jan 17, 2022, at 7:10 PM, heng du  wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Daniel Widdis  于2022年1月17日周一 18:11写道:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> On 1/15/22, 3:22 PM, "Willem Jiang"  wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Hugegraph[1], I would like to
> >> call a
> >>VOTE to accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator.
> >>
> >>Please cast your vote:
> >>
> >>  [ ] +1, bring Hugegraph into the Incubator
> >>  [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> >>  [ ] -1, do not bring Hugegraph into the Incubator, because...
> >>
> >>The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
> >>Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> >>
> >>Please check out the Hugegraph Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> >>
> >>[1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/31k4jsgmmfhl3vggnbko1rjsmqjymh29
> >>[2]
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
> >>
> >>Willem Jiang
> >>
> >>Twitter: willemjiang
> >>Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >>
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator

2022-01-20 Thread Willem Jiang
My +1(binding)
Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

> On Jan 17, 2022, at 7:10 PM, heng du  wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Daniel Widdis  于2022年1月17日周一 18:11写道:
> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> On 1/15/22, 3:22 PM, "Willem Jiang"  wrote:
>> 
>>Hi all,
>> 
>>Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Hugegraph[1], I would like to
>> call a
>>VOTE to accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator.
>> 
>>Please cast your vote:
>> 
>>  [ ] +1, bring Hugegraph into the Incubator
>>  [ ] +0, I don't care either way
>>  [ ] -1, do not bring Hugegraph into the Incubator, because...
>> 
>>The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the
>>Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
>> 
>>Please check out the Hugegraph Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
>> 
>>[1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/31k4jsgmmfhl3vggnbko1rjsmqjymh29
>>[2]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
>> 
>>Willem Jiang
>> 
>>Twitter: willemjiang
>>Weibo: 姜宁willem
>> 
>>-
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org